Introduction: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated smooth muscle tumors (EBV-SMT) are a rare complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Incidence data related to this EBV-SMT are limited. EBV DNA is universally present in these tumors. How these cells get infected with EBV, whether this is a result of primary EBV infection vs reactivation, and how persistent active EBV infection post-transplant influences EBV-SMT pathogenesis remains unknown. Methods: Among 5006 SOT recipients (474 pediatric, 4532 adult) receiving SOT at our center between Jan 1984 and Dec 2015, three cases of post-transplant EBV-SMT were identified. Results: All cases were pediatric heart transplants who were EBV seronegative prior to transplant, and experienced primary EBV infection with persistently elevated EBV viral loads, despite antiviral therapy. Two are deceased at 3.2 and 0.9 years post-diagnosis, while one remains alive 6.2 years post diagnosis. The overall local incidence of post-transplant EBV-SMT at our institution was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.2-1.7) per 1000 patient years, and 2.6 (95% CI, 0.6-6.7) per 1000 patient years in pediatric heart transplants. A literature review identified 36 pediatric and 51 adult cases of posttransplant EBV-SMT.
Conclusions:We hypothesize that pre-transplant EBV seronegativity, followed by primary EBV infection and persistently high EBV viral loads, represents a unique risk factor for post-transplant EBV-SMT. Pediatric heart transplant recipients were found to be disproportionately affected by post-transplant EBV-SMT at our institution.
K E Y W O R D SEBV-associated leiomyosarcoma, EBV-associated smooth muscle tumor, immunodeficiency associated leiomyosarcoma, immunodeficiency associated smooth muscle tumors, posttransplant leiomyosarcoma
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infections are common, causing significant morbidity in pregnancy (congenital CMV) and transplant recipients (CMV, EBV). Canadian prevalence data are needed to model disease burden and develop strategies for future vaccines. We estimated prevalence using screening data from blood donors and solid organ transplant (SOT) donors and recipients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed CMV and EBV serology from Alberta SOT donors ( n = 3,016) and recipients ( n = 4,614) (1984–2013) and Canadian Blood Services blood donors ( n = 1,253,350) (2005–2014), studying associations with age, sex, organ, year, and geographic region. Results: CMV seroprevalence rises gradually with age. By age 70, CMV seropositivity ranged from 67% (blood donors) to 73% (SOT recipients). Significant proportions of women of child-bearing age were CMV-seronegative (organ donors, 44%; SOT recipients, 43%; blood donors, 61%). Blood donor CMV seroprevalence decreased from 48% in Western Canada to 30% in Eastern Canada. Women were more likely to be CMV-seropositive (ORs = 1.58, 1.45, and 1.11 for organ donors, SOT recipients, and blood donors, respectively) and EBV-seropositive (ORs = 1.87 and 1.46 for organ donors and SOT recipients, respectively). EBV prevalence rises rapidly, and by age 17–29 years, 81% of SOT recipients and 90% of organ donors were seropositive. Conclusions: Canada has relatively low and perhaps decreasing age-specific EBV and CMV prevalence, making Canadians vulnerable to primary infection-associated morbidity and suggesting benefit from future vaccines. Collection and analysis of routine serology screening data are useful for observing trends.
Although antiviral prophylaxis has reduced cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and disease in seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients (R‐) receiving seropositive donor organs (D+), its impact on CMV transmission is uncertain. Transmission, defined as CMV antigenemia/CMV DNAemia and/or seroconversion by year 2, and associated demographic risk factors were studied retrospectively in 428 D+/R‐ and 429 D‐/R‐ patients receiving a SOT at our center. The cumulative transmission incidence was higher for lung (90.5%) and liver recipients (85.1%) than heart (72.7%), kidney (63.9%), and pancreas (56.2%) recipients (p < .001) and was significantly lower in living (50.1%) versus deceased donor (77.4%, p < .001) kidney recipients despite identical antiviral prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, only allograft type predicted transmission risk (HR [CI] lung 1.609 [1.159, 2.234] and liver 1.644 [1.209, 2.234] vs kidney). For 53 D+ donating to >1 R‐ with adequate follow‐up, 43 transmitted to all, three transmitted to none, and seven transmitted inconsistently with lungs and livers always transmitting but donor‐matched heart, kidney or kidney‐pancreas allografts sometimes not. Kidney pairs transmitted concordantly. CMV transmission risk is allograft‐specific and unchanged despite antiviral prophylaxis. Tracking transmission and defining donor factors associated with transmission escape may provide novel opportunities for more targeted CMV prevention and improve outcome analysis in antiviral and vaccine trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.