BACKGROUND A safe, effective vaccine is essential to end HIV. A canarypox/protein HIV vaccine regimen showed modest efficacy at reducing infection in Thailand. An analogous regimen using HIV-1 subtype C virus demonstrated potent humoral and cellular responses in a Phase 1/2a trial and triggered a Phase 2b/3 double-blinded trial to assess the safety and efficacy of this regimen in South Africa. METHODS We enrolled and randomized 5,404 healthy, HIV-uninfected 18-35-year olds at 14 sites to vaccine (2,704 participants) or placebo (2,700 participants) between 26 October 2016 and 21 June 2019. The vaccine regimen consisted of two ALVAC-HIV (vCP2438) (expressing HIV-1 subtype C env, clade B gp41 , gag and pro) immunizations at months 0 and 1, with booster immunizations of ALVAC-HIV plus bivalent subtype C gp120 protein/MF59 adjuvant at months 3, 6, 12 and 18. Efficacy was evaluated by HIV testing every 3 months. RESULTS In January 2020, pre-specified non-efficacy criteria were met at an interim analysis; further vaccinations were subsequently halted. The vaccines were safe and well-tolerated in the study population (median age 24, 70% female-sex-at-birth). Over the primary 24-month follow-up, there were 133 infections among placebo recipients and 138 among vaccinees (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95%CI, 0.81-1.30; P=0.84). Pre-specified subgroup analyses demonstrated no difference in efficacy by sex or when restricting to follow-up post-4 th vaccination, and no difference amongst female-sex-at-birth by age, BMI, prevalent STIs, behavioral risk score or region. CONCLUSIONS The ALVAC/gp120 regimen did not prevent HIV infection in South Africans despite prior evidence of immunogenicity. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02968849)

Background Coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is common in Africa; however, the impact of HBV infection on the outcomes of antiretroviral therapy programs is unclear. We evaluated the impact of chronic hepatitis B on HIV virologic response, changes in CD4 cell count, hepatotoxicity, and mortality among Africans receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving a workplace HAART program in South Africa. Participants received HAART according to a protocol and were followed up for up to 72 weeks. On the basis of pre-HAART serum assays, patients were classified as being hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, HBsAg positive with a low HBV DNA level (≤1 × 104 copies/mL), and HBsAg positive with a high HBV DNA level (>1 × 104 copies/mL). The relationships between HBV status and HIV RNA suppression, change in CD4 cell count, mortality, and hepatotoxicity were assessed with use of regression techniques. Results Five hundred thirty-seven individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 431 (80.3%) of these patients were HBsAg negative, 60 (11.2%) were HBsAg positive with a low HBV DNA level, and 46 (8.6%) were HBsAg positive with a high HBV DNA level. All groups had similar rates of HIV RNA suppression (P =.61), CD4 cell count increases (P =.75), and mortality (17 total deaths; P =.11) for up to 72 weeks after the initiation of HAART. Baseline transaminase levels were highest in the group with high HBV DNA levels (P =.004). Hepatotoxicity was similar between the HBsAg-negative group and the group with low HBV DNA levels but was higher in the group with high HBV DNA levels (incidence rate ratio, 4.4). Conclusions We revealed that HBV status does not affect HIV RNA suppression, CD4 cell count response, or mortality during the first 72 weeks of HAART in an African setting. The risk of HBV-associated hepatotoxicity, however, is associated with the baseline HBV DNA level.

Summary Background Targeted preventive therapy for individuals at highest risk of incident tuberculosis might impact the epidemic by interrupting transmission. We tested performance of a transcriptomic signature of tuberculosis (RISK11) and efficacy of signature-guided preventive therapy in parallel, using a hybrid three-group study design. Methods Adult volunteers aged 18–59 years were recruited at five geographically distinct communities in South Africa. Whole blood was sampled for RISK11 by quantitative RT-PCR assay from eligible volunteers without HIV, recent previous tuberculosis (ie, <3 years before screening), or comorbidities at screening. RISK11-positive participants were block randomised (1:2; block size 15) to once-weekly, directly-observed, open-label isoniazid and rifapentine for 12 weeks (ie, RISK11 positive and 3HP positive), or no treatment (ie, RISK11 positive and 3HP negative). A subset of eligible RISK11-negative volunteers were randomly assigned to no treatment (ie, RISK11 negative and 3HP negative). Diagnostic discrimination of prevalent tuberculosis was tested in all participants at baseline. Thereafter, prognostic discrimination of incident tuberculosis was tested in the untreated RISK11-positive versus RISK11-negative groups, and treatment efficacy in the 3HP-treated versus untreated RISK11-positive groups, during active surveillance through 15 months. The primary endpoint was microbiologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis. The primary outcome measures were risk ratio [RR] for tuberculosis of RISK11-positive to RISK11-negative participants, and treatment efficacy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02735590 . Findings 20 207 volunteers were screened, and 2923 participants were enrolled, including RISK11-positive participants randomly assigned to 3HP (n=375) or no 3HP (n=764), and 1784 RISK11-negative participants. Cumulative probability of prevalent or incident tuberculosis disease was 0·066 (95% CI 0·049 to 0·084) in RISK11-positive (3HP negative) participants and 0·018 (0·011 to 0·025) in RISK11-negative participants (RR 3·69, 95% CI 2·25–6·05) over 15 months. Tuberculosis prevalence was 47 (4·1%) of 1139 versus 14 (0·78%) of 1984 in RISK11-positive compared with RISK11-negative participants, respectively (diagnostic RR 5·13, 95% CI 2·93 to 9·43). Tuberculosis incidence over 15 months was 2·09 (95% CI 0·97 to 3·19) vs 0·80 (0·30 to 1·30) per 100 person years in RISK11-positive (3HP-negative) participants compared with RISK11-negative participants (cumulative incidence ratio 2·6, 95% CI 1·2 to 5·9). Serious adverse events related to 3HP included one hospitalisation for seizures (unintentional isoniazid overdose) and one death of unknown cause (possibly temporally related). Tuberculosis incidence over 15 months was 1·94 (95% CI 0·35 to 3·50) versus 2·09 (95% CI 0·97 to 3·19) per 100 person-years in 3H...

SummaryBackgroundModest efficacy was reported for the HIV vaccine tested in the RV144 trial, which comprised a canarypox vector (ALVAC) and envelope (env) glycoprotein (gp120). These vaccine components were adapted to express HIV-1 antigens from strains circulating in South Africa, and the adjuvant was changed to increase immunogenicity. Furthermore, 12-month immunisation was added to improve durability. In the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) 100 trial, we aimed to assess this new regionally adapted regimen for advancement to efficacy testing.MethodsHVTN 100 is a phase 1/2, randomised controlled, double-blind trial at six community research sites in South Africa. We randomly allocated adults (aged 18–40 years) without HIV infection and at low risk of HIV infection to either the vaccine regimen (intramuscular injection of ALVAC-HIV vector [vCP2438] at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months plus bivalent subtype C gp120 and MF59 adjuvant at 3, 6, and 12 months) or placebo, in a 5:1 ratio. Randomisation was done by computer-generated list. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to random assignments. Primary outcomes included safety and immune responses associated with correlates of HIV risk in RV144, 2 weeks after vaccination at 6 months (month 6·5). We compared per-protocol participants (ie, those who completed the first four vaccinations and provided samples at month 6·5) from HVTN 100 with stored RV144 samples assayed contemporaneously. This trial is registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Registry (DOH-27-0215-4796) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02404311).FindingsBetween Feb 9, 2015, and May 26, 2015, 252 participants were enrolled, of whom 210 were assigned vaccine and 42 placebo. 222 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis (185 vaccine and 37 placebo). 185 (100%) vaccine recipients developed IgG binding antibodies to all three vaccine-matched gp120 antigens with significantly higher titres (3·6–8·8 fold; all p<0·0001) than the corresponding vaccine-matched responses of RV144. The CD4+ T-cell response to the ZM96.C env protein in HVTN 100 was 56·4% (n=102 responders), compared with a response of 41·4% (n=79 responders) to 92TH023.AE in RV144 (p=0·0050). The IgG response to the 1086.C variable loops 1 and 2 (V1V2) env antigen in HVTN 100 was 70·5% (95% CI 63·5–76·6; n=129 responders), lower than the response to V1V2 in RV144 (99·0%, 95% CI 96·4–99·7; n=199 responders).InterpretationAlthough the IgG response to the HVTN 100 vaccine was lower than that reported in RV144, it exceeded the predicted 63% threshold needed for 50% vaccine efficacy using a V1V2 correlate of protection model. Thus, the subtype C HIV vaccine regimen qualified for phase 2b/3 efficacy testing, a critical next step of vaccine development.FundingUS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Background The Phambili study, conducted in South Africa amongst a predominantly heterosexual population, evaluated the efficacy of the MRK Ad5 gag/pol/nef subtype B HIV-1 preventive vaccine. Enrollment and vaccinations were stopped, participants unblinded, and follow-up extended when the Step study evaluating the same vaccine in the Americas, Caribbean and Australia was unblinded for non-efficacy with more HIV infections amongst vaccinee than placebo recipients [ZM1]. Extensive analyses over the complete follow-up period, most of which was unblinded, are reported. Methods Phambili participants were HIV-1 uninfected, sexually active men and women aged 18–35 years, followed for 3.5 years. HIV testing and risk reduction counseling occurred at weeks 0, 12, 30 and were switched to a 3 monthly schedule after unblinding. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HIV-1 infection hazard ratios (HR) comparing vaccine to placebo recipients, overall and within subgroups. Long-term vaccine efficacy was evaluated in participants who were unblinded early in follow-up. Results Of the 801 participants enrolled (400 vaccine, 401 placebo), 112 (28%) received 1 vaccination, 259 (65%) 2 vaccinations and 29(7%) 3 vaccinations. More infections occurred in vaccinees (n=63) as compared to placebo (n=37) (adjusted HR (vaccine:placebo) 1.70, 95% CI 1.13–2.55, p = 0.01). We found no increase in infections with the number of vaccinations received and that the HRs did not differ by gender, circumcision, or Ad5 serostatus. Differences in risk behavior at baseline or during the study, or differential drop-out (p=0.40) are unlikely explanations for the increased rate of HIV-1 infections seen in vaccinees. Conclusion The increased HR of HIV-1 acquisition, irrespective of number of doses received, warrants further investigation to understand the biological mechanism. Further use of the Ad5 vector for HIV vaccines is not warranted