Objective-High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) in the intracerebral electroencephalogram (EEG) have been linked to the seizure onset zone (SOZ). We investigated whether HFOs can delineate epileptogenic areas even outside the SOZ by correlating the resection of HFO-generating areas with surgical outcome.Methods-Twenty patients who underwent a surgical resection for medically intractable epilepsy were studied. All had presurgical intracerebral EEG (500Hz filter and 2,000Hz sampling rate), at least 12-month postsurgical follow-up, and a postsurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). HFOs (ripples, 80 -250Hz; fast ripples, >250Hz) were identified visually during 5 to 10 minutes of slow-wave sleep. Rates and extent of HFOs and interictal spikes in resected versus nonresected areas, assessed on postsurgical MRIs, were compared with surgical outcome (Engel's classification). We also evaluated the predictive value of removing the SOZ in terms of surgical outcome.Results-The mean duration of follow-up was 22.7 months. Eight patients had good (Engel classes 1 and 2) and 12 poor (classes 3 and 4) surgical outcomes. Patients with a good outcome had a significantly larger proportion of HFO-generating areas removed than patients with a poor outcome. No such difference was seen for spike-generating regions or the SOZ.Interpretation-The correlation between removal of HFO-generating areas and good surgical outcome indicates that HFOs could be used as a marker of epileptogenicity and may be more accurate than spike-generating areas or the SOZ. In patients in whom the majority of HFOgenerating tissue remained, a poor surgical outcome occurred.Thirty percent to 40% of patients with focal epilepsy are medically intractable, 1 and for some, surgical removal of epileptogenic areas is the best option to gain seizure freedom. Intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) investigations are indicated for patients in whom noninvasive methods fail to identify a single focal seizure generator. CIHR Author Manuscript CIHR Author Manuscript CIHR Author ManuscriptiEEG is used to define the seizure onset zone (SOZ). 3 Removal of the SOZ alone, however, does not always predict the surgical benefit. 4,5 It is uncertain whether the outcome can be improved by removing areas of interictal spiking, often more widespread than the SOZ. 6,7 Intracranial studies also have limitations, as their results depend on electrode location and type of implantation (intracortical vs subdural). For instance, iEEG electrodes only record neuronal activity in their direct vicinity and are blind for other areas, 8 making it hard to judge whether the activity at seizure onset really represents the seizure generator or is the result of propagation from else-where. Thus the actual focus and its extent may be missed, leading to unsuccessful surgery.Microelectrode-recorded high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), ripples (80 -250Hz), and fast ripples (FRs, 250 -500Hz), were found predominantly in epileptogenic tissue. 9 -11 They can also be recorded with macroelectrodes duri...

High frequency oscillations (HFOs) called ripples (80-250 Hz) and fast ripples (FR, 250-500 Hz) can be recorded from intracerebral EEG macroelectrodes in patients with intractable epilepsy. HFOs occur predominantly in the seizure onset zone (SOZ) but their relationship to the underlying pathology is unknown. It was the aim of this study to investigate whether HFOs are specific to the SOZ or result from pathologically changed tissue, whether or not it is epileptogenic. Patients with different lesion types, namely mesial temporal atrophy (MTA), focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) and nodular heterotopias (NH) were investigated. Intracranial EEG was recorded from depth macroelectrodes with a sampling rate of 2000 Hz. Ripples (80-250 Hz) and Fast Ripples (250-500 Hz) were visually marked in 12 patients: five with MTA, four with FCD and three with NH. Rates of events were statistically compared in channels in four areas: lesional SOZ, non-lesional SOZ, lesional non-SOZ and non-lesional non-SOZ. HFO rates were clearly more linked to the SOZ than to the lesion. They were highest in areas in which lesion and SOZ overlap, but in patients with a SOZ outside the lesion, such as in NHs, HFO rates were clearly higher in the non-lesional SOZ than in the inactive lesions. No specific HFO pattern could be identified for the different lesion types. The findings suggest that HFOs represent a marker for SOZ areas independent of the underlying pathology and that pathologic tissue changes alone do not lead to high rates of HFOs.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.