The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) trans- activator protein, Tat, stimulates transcription from the viral long-terminal repeats (LTR) through an RNA hairpin element, trans-activation responsive region (TAR). We and others have shown that trans-activator protein (Tat)-associated histone acetyltransferases (TAHs), p300 and p300/CBP-associating factor (PCAF), assist functionally in the activation of chromosomally integrated HIV-1 LTR. Here, we show that p300 and PCAF also directly acetylate Tat. We defined two sites of acetylation located in different functional domains of Tat. p300 acetylated Lys50 in the TAR RNA binding domain, while PCAF acetylated Lys28 in the activation domain of Tat. In support of a functional role for acetylation in vivo, histone deacetylase inhibitor (trichostatin A) synergized with Tat in transcriptional activation of the HIV-1 LTR. Synergism was TAR-dependent and required the intact presence of both Lys28 and Lys50. Mechanistically, acetylation at Lys28 by PCAF enhanced Tat binding to the Tat-associated kinase, CDK9/P-TEFb, while acetylation by p300 at Lys50 of Tat promoted the dissociation of Tat from TAR RNA that occurs during early transcription elongation. These data suggest that acetylation of Tat regulates two discrete and functionally critical steps in transcription, binding to an RNAP II CTD-kinase and release of Tat from TAR RNA.

The bovine leukemia virus (BLV) promoter is located in its 5-long terminal repeat and is composed of the U3, R, and U5 regions. BLV transcription is regulated by cis-acting elements located in the U3 region, including three 21-bp enhancers required for transactivation of the BLV promoter by the virus-encoded transactivator Tax BLV . In addition to the U3 cis-acting elements, both the R and U5 regions contain stimulatory sequences. To date, no transcription factor-binding site has been identified in the R region. Here sequence analysis of this region revealed the presence of a potential E box motif (5-CACGTG-3). By competition and supershift gel shift assays, we demonstrated that the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors USF1 and USF2 specifically interacted with this R region E box motif. Mutations abolishing upstream stimulatory factor (USF) binding caused a reproducible decrease in basal or Tax-activated BLV promoter-driven gene expression in transient transfection assays of B-lymphoid cell lines. Cotransfection experiments showed that the USF1 and USF2a transactivators were able to act through the BLV R region E box. Taken together, these results physically and functionally characterize a USF-binding site in the R region of BLV. This E box motif located downstream of the transcription start site constitutes a new positive regulatory element involved in the transcriptional activity of the BLV promoter and could play an important role in virus replication. Bovine leukemia virus (BLV)1 is a B-lymphotropic oncogenic retrovirus that infects cattle and is associated with enzootic bovine leukosis, a neoplastic proliferation of B-cells (1-6). BLV is closely related to human T-lymphotropic viruses HTLV-I and -II. The majority of BLV-infected cattle are asymptomatic carriers of the virus. Only about 30% of BLV-infected animals develop a preneoplastic condition termed persistent lymphocytosis, with 2-5% developing B-cell leukemia and/or lymphoma after a long latency period. The virus can be experimentally transmitted to sheep, in which it causes similar pathologies, providing a helpful model to understand BLV and HTLV-induced leukemogenesis. BLV infection is characterized by viral latency in the large majority of infected cells and by the absence of viremia. These features are thought to be due to the transcriptional repression of viral expression in vivo (7-9). The latency is likely to be a viral strategy to escape the host immune response and allow tumor development.BLV transcription initiates at the unique promoter located in the 5Ј-long terminal repeat (5Ј-LTR) of the BLV genome. The 5Ј-LTR is composed of the U3, R, and U5 regions and transcription initiates at the U3-R junction. The U3 region contains the main sites that regulate viral transcription (Fig. 1) as follows: the promoter CAAT and TATA boxes (10, 11), a glucocorticoidresponsive element (12-15), and a large segment protected in DNase footprinting assays containing NF-B-related sites (16,17). Among the most important sites are three copies of an imp...

Repression of viral expression is a major strategy developed by retroviruses to escape from the host immune response. The absence of viral proteins (or derived peptides) at the surface of an infected cell does not permit the establishment of an efficient immune attack. Such a strategy appears to have been adopted by animal oncoviruses such as bovine leukemia virus (BLV) and human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV). In BLV-infected animals, only a small fraction of the infected lymphocytes (between 1 in 5,000 and 1 in 50,000) express large amounts of viral proteins; the vast majority of the proviruses are repressed at the transcriptional level. Induction of BLV transcription involves the interaction of the virus-encoded Tax protein with the CREB/ATF factors; the resulting complex is able to interact with three 21-bp Tax-responsive elements (TxRE) located in the 5 long terminal repeat (5 LTR). These TxRE contain cyclic AMP-responsive elements (CRE), but, remarkably, the "TGACGTCA" consensus is never strictly conserved in any viral strain (e.g.,AGACGTCA, TGACGGCA, TGACCTCA). To assess the role of these suboptimal CREs, we introduced a perfect consensus sequence within the TxRE and showed by gel retardation assays that the binding efficiency of the CREB/ATF proteins was increased. However, trans-activation of a luciferase-based reporter by Tax was not affected in transient transfection assays. Still, in the absence of Tax, the basal promoter activity of the mutated LTR was increased as much as 20-fold. In contrast, mutation of other regulatory elements within the LTR (the E box, NF-B, and glucocorticoid-or interferon-responsive sites [GRE or IRF]) did not induce a similar alteration of the basal transcription levels. To evaluate the biological relevance of these observations made in vitro, the mutations were introduced into an infectious BLV molecular clone. After injection into sheep, it appeared that all the recombinants were infectious in vivo and did not revert into a wild-type virus. All of them, except one, propagated at wild-type levels, indicating that viral spread was not affected by the mutation. The sole exception was the CRE mutant; proviral loads were drastically reduced in sheep infected with this type of virus. We conclude that a series of sites (NF-B, IRF, GRE, and the E box) are not required for efficient viral spread in the sheep model, although mutation of some of these motifs might induce a minor phenotype during transient transfection assays in vitro. Remarkably, a provirus (pBLV-⌬21-bp) harboring only two TxRE was infectious and propagated at wild-type levels. And, most importantly, reconstitution of a consensus CRE, within the 21-bp enhancers increases binding of CREB/ATF proteins but abrogates basal repression of LTR-directed transcription in vitro. Suboptimal CREs are, however, essential for efficient viral spread within infected sheep, although these sites are dispensable for infectivity. These results suggest an evolutionary selection of suboptimal CREs that repress viral expression with escape ...