IMPORTANCE When clinicians work with symptoms of infection, they can put patients and colleagues at risk. Little is known about the reasons why attending physicians and advanced practice clinicians (APCs) work while sick.OBJECTIVE To identify a comprehensive understanding of the reasons why attending physicians and APCs work while sick. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a mixed-methods analysis of a cross-sectional, anonymous survey administered from January 15 through March 20, 2014, in a large children's hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Data were analyzed from April 1 through June 1, 2014. The survey was administered to 459 attending physicians and 470 APCs, including certified registered nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse midwives. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-reported frequency of working while experiencing symptoms of infection, perceived importance of various factors that encourage working while sick, and free-text comments written in response to open-ended questions. RESULTS Of those surveyed, we received responses from 280 attending physicians (61.0%) and 256 APCs (54.5%). Most of the respondents (504 [95.3%]) believed that working while sick put patients at risk. Despite this belief, 446 respondents (83.1%) reported working sick at least 1 time in the past year, and 50 (9.3%) reported working while sick at least 5 times. Respondents would work with significant symptoms, including diarrhea (161 [30.0%]), fever (86 [16.0%]), and acute onset of significant respiratory symptoms (299 [55.6%]). Physicians were more likely to report working with each of these symptoms than APCs (109 [38.9%] vs 51 [19.9%], 61 [21.8%] vs 25 [9.8%], and 168 [60.0%] vs 130 [50.8%], respectively [P < .05]). Reasons deemed important in deciding to work while sick included not wanting to let colleagues down (521 [98.7%]), staffing concerns (505 [94.9%]), not wanting to let patients down (494 [92.5%]), fear of ostracism by colleagues (342 [64.0%]), and concern about continuity of care (337 [63.8%]). Systematic qualitative analysis of free-text comments from 316 respondents revealed additional reasons why attending physicians and APCs work while sick, including extreme difficulty finding coverage (205 [64.9%]), a strong cultural norm to come to work unless remarkably ill (193 [61.1%]), and ambiguity about what constitutes "too sick to work" (180 [57.0%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Attending physicians and APCs frequently work while sick despite recognizing that this choice puts patients at risk. The decision to work sick is shaped by systems-level and sociocultural factors. Multimodal interventions are needed to reduce the frequency of this behavior.

The hospital-wide attack rate for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea at our tertiary-care university hospital was 0.02 per 100 patient discharges (0.02%) in 1982, but 0.41% and 1.47% in 1986 and 1987, respectively, with a peak incidence of 2.25% in the fourth quarter of 1987. Hospital antibiotic usage patterns showed concurrent increased use of third-generation cephalosporins, and intravenous vancomycin and metronidazole. Thirty-seven cases selected for study were older than 37 control patients, more likely to have an underlying malignancy and less likely hospitalized on the obstetrics/gynecology service. Their mean duration of hospitalization prior to diagnosis was 21 days, versus a mean total length of stay of eight days for controls. All cases received antibiotics, compared to 24 of the controls. Cases were given more antibiotics for longer periods, and more often received clindamycin, third-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and vancomycin. Gender, race, duration of hospitalization, prior surgery and antiulcer therapy were not significant by logistic regression analysis. Epidemiologic variables with significantly different adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were age greater than 65 years (14.1, 1.4-141), intensive care unit residence (39.2, 2.2-713), gastrointestinal procedure (23.2, 2.1-255) and more than ten antibiotic days (summation of days of each antibiotic administered) (16.1, 2.2-117). Control measures included encouraging earlier isolation and treatment of suspected cases and formulary restriction of clindamycin, with use of metronidazole for therapy of anaerobic infections. By the second half of 1988, the attack rate had dropped progressively to 0.74%.

To our knowledge, this is the first US study to report a reemergence of gram-negative organisms as a cause of PHA-BSIs. This finding does not seem to be related to changes in specific gram-negative organisms or to antimicrobial resistance. If this trend continues, it will have important implications for the management of bloodstream infections.

The hospital-wide attack rate for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea at our tertiary-care university hospital was 0.02 per 100 patient discharges (0.02%) in 1982, but 0.41% and 1.47% in 1986 and 1987, respectively, with a peak incidence of 2.25% in the fourth quarter of 1987. Hospital antibiotic usage patterns showed concurrent increased use of third-generation cephalosporins, and intravenous vancomycin and metronidazole. Thirty-seven cases selected for study were older than 37 control patients, more likely to have an underlying malignancy and less likely hospitalized on the obstetrics/gynecology service. Their mean duration of hospitalization prior to diagnosis was 21 days, versus a mean total length of stay of eight days for controls. All cases received antibiotics, compared to 24 of the controls. Cases were given more antibiotics for longer periods, and more often received clindamycin, third-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and vancomycin. Gender, race, duration of hospitalization, prior surgery and antiulcer therapy were not significant by logistic regression analysis. Epidemiologic variables with significantly different adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were age greater than 65 years (14.1, 1.4-141), intensive care unit residence (39.2, 2.2-713), gastrointestinal procedure (23.2, 2.1-255) and more than ten antibiotic days (summation of days of each antibiotic administered) (16.1, 2.2-117). Control measures included encouraging earlier isolation and treatment of suspected cases and formulary restriction of clindamycin, with use of metronidazole for therapy of anaerobic infections. By the second half of 1988, the attack rate had dropped progressively to 0.74%.

Tabletop exercises are a feasible, well-accepted modality for hospital bioterrorism preparedness training. Hospital employees, including physicians and nurses, rank this method as highly useful for guiding preplanning activities. Infection control staff and hospital epidemiologists should play a lead role in hospital preparedness activities. Further assessment of the optimal duration, type, and frequency of tabletop exercises is needed.