Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling is the standard of care for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. While many two-way comparisons between needle types have been made in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear which size and type of needle offers the best probability of diagnosis. We therefore performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different sized and shaped needles to rank the diagnostic performance of each needle. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases through August, 2020 for RCTs that compared the diagnostic accuracy of EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) needles in solid pancreatic masses. Using a random-effects NMA under the frequentist framework, RCTs were analyzed to identify the best needle type and sampling technique. Performance scores (P-scores) were used to rank the different needles based on pooled diagnostic accuracy. The NMA model was used to calculate pairwise relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals. Results Review of 2577 studies yielded 29 RCTs for quantitative synthesis, comparing 13 different needle types. All 22G FNB needles had an RR > 1 compared to the reference 22G FNA (Cook) needle. The highest P-scores were seen with the 22G Medtronic FNB needle (0.9279), followed by the 22G Olympus FNB needle (0.8962) and the 22G Boston Scientific FNB needle (0.8739). Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between needles with or without suction. Conclusions In comparison to FNA needles, FNB needles offer the highest diagnostic performance in sampling pancreatic masses, particularly with 22G FNB needles.
Background: Photothermal therapies have shown promise for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma when they can be applied selectively, but off-target heating can frustrate treatment outcomes. Improved strategies leveraging selective binding and localized heating are possible with precision medical approaches such as functionalized gold nanoparticles, but careful control of optical dosage and thermal generation would be imperative. However, the literature review revealed many groups assume liver properties for pancreas tissue or rely on insufficiently rigorous characterization studies. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the thermal conductivity and optical properties at 808/1064 nm wavelengths in healthy samples of fresh and frozen porcine pancreas ex vivo. Methods: Thermal conductivity of the porcine pancreas tissue was measured by utilizing a hot plate and two K-type thermocouples. Experimental variables such as tissue sample thickness, hot plate temperature, and heat convection coefficient were estimated through the control experiments utilizing specimens with known thermal conductivity. Optical evaluations assessed light attenuation at the 808 and 1064 nm wavelengths (continuous wave, collimated beam) by measuring the light transmittance and reflectance of different tissue thicknesses. In turn, these measurements were input into an inverse adding-doubling program to estimate the optical absorption and reduced scattering coefficients. Results: Interestingly, pancreas tissue thermal conductivity was demonstrated to have no significant difference (p > 0.5) between samples that were fresh, frozen for 7 days, or frozen for 14 days. Conversely, optical property assessment exhibited a significant difference (p < 0.001) between fresh and frozen tissue samples, with increased absorbance and reflectance within the frozen group. However, the optical attenuation values measured were substantially less than that of the liver or reported in previous pancreas studies, suggesting a wide overestimation of these properties. Conclusions: These thermal and optical properties are critical to the development of novel therapeutic strategies like plasmonic photothermal therapy, but perhaps more importantly, are invaluable towards informing better surgical planning and operative technique among the existing thermal approaches for treating pancreas tissue. K E Y W O R D Sabsorption coefficient, fresh versus frozen porcine pancreas tissue, porcine pancreas optical properties, porcine pancreas thermal conductivity, scattering coefficient
The aim of this study is to systematically review outcomes related to treatment success, mortality, and adverse events of endoscopic management in patients with sterile walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Methods:We reviewed studies published from 2008 to 2018 from Medline and Embase that evaluated the endoscopic treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. The primary outcome was success of treatment in resolving the collection. Secondary outcomes included length of hospitalization, mortality rate, and adverse events.Results: Five studies were included, which entailed a total of 280 patients with a mean age of 51.8 years. The primary indication for endoscopic treatment was symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Four studies used endoscopic transmural drainage, one of them combining percutaneous drainage and 1 study performed transpapillary drainage. The pooled treatment success was 94.3% with a mean time to resolution of 77.8 days. The mean length of stay was 16.3 days, and mortality rate was 1.3%. The overall adverse event rate was 24.6%, with bleeding the most common adverse event (11%), followed by pancreatic fistula formation (3.4%) and perforation (2.7%). Conclusions:Although endoscopic management of sterile pancreatic necrosis has a high rate of treatment success, there is a relatively high rate of adverse events, bleeding being the most common.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.