Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) is a fatal brain cancer that arises in the brainstem of children with no effective treatment and near 100% fatality. The failure of most therapies can be attributed to the delicate location of these tumors and choosing therapies based on assumptions that DIPGs are molecularly similar to adult disease. Recent studies have unraveled the unique genetic make-up of this brain cancer with nearly 80% harboring a K27M-H3.3 or K27M-H3.1 mutation. However, DIPGs are still thought of as one disease with limited understanding of the genetic drivers of these tumors. To understand what drives DIPGs we integrated whole-genome-sequencing with methylation, expression and copy-number profiling, discovering that DIPGs are three molecularly distinct subgroups (H3-K27M, Silent, MYCN) and uncovering a novel recurrent activating mutation in the activin receptor ACVR1, in 20% of DIPGs. Mutations in ACVR1 were constitutively activating, leading to SMAD phosphorylation and increased expression of downstream activin signaling targets ID1 and ID2. Our results highlight distinct molecular subgroups and novel therapeutic targets for this incurable pediatric cancer.

Posterior fossa ependymoma comprises two distinct molecular variants termed EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB that have a distinct biology and natural history. The therapeutic value of cytoreductive surgery and radiation therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma after accounting for molecular subgroup is not known. MethodsFour independent nonoverlapping retrospective cohorts of posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 820) were profiled using genome-wide methylation arrays. Risk stratification models were designed based on known clinical and newly described molecular biomarkers identified by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. ResultsMolecular subgroup is a powerful independent predictor of outcome even when accounting for age or treatment regimen. Incompletely resected EPN_PFA ependymomas have a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year progression-free survival ranging from 26.1% to 56.8% across all four cohorts. Although first-line (adjuvant) radiation is clearly beneficial for completely resected EPN_PFA, a substantial proportion of patients with EPN_PFB can be cured with surgery alone, and patients with relapsed EPN_PFB can often be treated successfully with delayed external-beam irradiation. ConclusionThe most impactful biomarker for posterior fossa ependymoma is molecular subgroup affiliation, independent of other demographic or treatment variables. However, both EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB still benefit from increased extent of resection, with the survival rates being particularly poor for subtotally resected EPN_PFA, even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients with EPN_PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should be considered for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of observation alone with radiation reserved for those who experience recurrence. INTRODUCTIONEpendymoma is the third most common posterior fossa tumor of childhood and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric oncology, occurring across the entire age spectrum. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Current therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma in children is aggressive surgical resection followed by involved-field radiation, resulting in 7-year event free-survival of 65%. 12,15 Despite the high mortality rate, trials of cytotoxic chemotherapy have failed to reveal a clear survival benefit for chemotherapy over surgery and radiation alone, although definitive pediatric randomized trials of maintenance chemotherapy are still recruiting through cooperative groups (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01096368 and NCT02265770). 1,5,17 In adults, posterior fossa ependymoma is frequently treated with surgery alone. 18Numerous publications have suggested that the most powerful prognostic factor for posterior fossa ependymoma is the extent of surgical resection or, more appropriately, the amount of residual tumor after surgery. This has entailed an aggressive surgical approach, with some oncologists and surgeons tolerating serious neurologic deficits, including the need for tracheostomies and gastrostom...