isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN42520374.

Background Impulsivity critically relates to many psychiatric disorders. Given the multi-faceted construct that impulsivity represents, defining core aspects of impulsivity is vital for the assessment and understanding of clinical conditions. Choice impulsivity (CI), involving the preferential selection of smaller sooner rewards over larger later rewards, represents one important type of impulsivity. Method The International Society for Research on Impulsivity (InSRI) convened to discuss the definition and assessment of CI and provide recommendations regarding measurement across species. Results Commonly used preclinical and clinical CI behavioral tasks are described, and considerations for each task are provided to guide CI task selection. Differences in assessment of CI (self-report, behavioral) and calculating CI indices (e.g., area-under-the-curve, indifference point, steepness of discounting curve) are discussed along with properties of specific behavioral tasks used in preclinical and clinical settings. Conclusions The InSRI group recommends inclusion of measures of CI in human studies examining impulsivity. Animal studies examining impulsivity should also include assessments of CI and these measures should be harmonized in accordance with human studies of the disorders being modeled in the preclinical investigations. The choice of specific CI measures to be included should be based on the goals of the study and existing preclinical and clinical literature using established CI measures.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is escalating all over the world and has higher morbidities and mortalities in certain vulnerable populations. People Who Use Drugs (PWUD) are a marginalized and stigmatized group with weaker immunity responses, vulnerability to stress, poor health conditions, high-risk behaviors, and lower access to health care services. These conditions put them at a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and its complications. In this paper, an international group of experts on addiction medicine, infectious diseases, and disaster psychiatry explore the possible raised concerns in this issue and provide recommendations to manage the comorbidity of COVID-19 and Substance Use Disorder (SUD).

This paper reviews clinical evidence suggesting that antagonism of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of glutamate receptors by ethanol may convey an important component of the ethanol intoxication signal, that is, subjective and objective responses associated with the consumption of a large amount of ethanol. It will then review recent evidence that two phenotypes associated with increased risk for heavy alcohol consumption, recovering ethanol-dependent patients, and healthy individuals with a family history of alcohol dependence, exhibit reduced sensitivity to the dysphoric consequences of administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist, ketamine. Each of these groups displays reduced sensitivity to a potentially important response that might normally trigger the cessation of ethanol consumption. These data raise the possibility that alterations in NMDA receptor function that reduce the response to the NMDA antagonist component of ethanol may increase the risk for heavy drinking. This hypothesis is consistent with growing evidence that NMDA receptor antagonists may play a role in the treatment of alcoholism by suppressing alcohol withdrawal, reducing the development or expression of alcohol tolerance, or preventing or reversing the sensitiziation to ethanol effects.