Using survey methodology, this study examines employee perceptions of two key organizational design factors (employee empowerment and alignment of safety practices) and their relationship with nonreporting of employee injuries and near misses. Results show employee perceptions of alignment of safety practices are related to decreased levels of unreported near misses and unreported first aid injuries. However, perceptions of employee empowerment generated counterintuitive results, indicating empowerment is associated with increased levels of unreported near misses. Given the importance of reporting safety incidents, including near misses, to improving safety outcomes, the results reveal that organizational designs that empower employees with regard to safety may yield unintended-and undesirable-consequences.
As Laura Empson notes in this revealing exploration of the emotions experienced by a professor daring to live in both the academic and practice worlds, the observation that there exists two cultures has been made before. These are often arms-length, third-person discussions of identity conflict embedded in schools in which some faculty stray to practice and others disparage such adventures. It is critical, however, that we find a way to explore how these conflicts are experienced and felt by those caught in the crossfire. What words are spoken to them? How are the guilt trips induced? What are the day-to-day behavioral nudges that get us back in line when we stray? Using autoethnography, Empson takes us on her own journey as she moved from one world to the other and describes what she faces as she continues her engagement with "the other."Autoethnography is an especially appropriate means of exploring the cultures of and the true nature of the "great divide" between the academy and practice. We easily discuss a division between the cultures (Beyer, 1997; Rynes, Bartunek, & Daft, 2001) as clear categories of belief and action, but often (though not always) at a somewhat abstract level. Autoethnography reveals the social world and cultures-the rituals, the initiation processes, and storiesthrough the autobiographical observations of the writer. As Bochner (2000) points out, narratives such as these "help the reader or listener to understand and feel the phenomena under scrutiny" (p. 270). By exploring the identity work required in the process of moving between cultures, we see the academic world experienced as more purposively detached and maybe even cynical about the world of practice. For those concerned about improving connections between the two communities, these insights are invaluable.As useful as autoethnography is as a method for exploring the nature of these ongoing disciplines, it also is a medium through which emotions and reactions to them can be understood. Empson reveals some real pain in this experience, but there is an edginess to her reaction and her writing that makes this less a cautionary tale than, perhaps, a line in the sand.She draws it with a combination of self-effacing humor (note the anxiety induced by finding the right graduate student wardrobe) and passion. In the end, her examination of the experience yields a potentially useful model for examining how the divide is experienced by individuals, but she also suggests coping mechanisms that have allowed her to remain engaged with both the academic world and practice.Empson concludes this study by suggesting that autoethnography may be an essential methodology for examining issues relevant to a range of issues associated with academicpractitioner worlds, relationships, and conflict. This is a sensible call. Autoethnography allowed Empson to tell her story, and in her way offer criticism. As such, Empson's experiences will resonate particularly with those who spent time as managers or consultants before returning to school for a doctorate....
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.