Freshwater ecosystems play a major role in global carbon cycling through the breakdown of organic material and release of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions from lakes, wetlands, reservoirs and small natural ponds have been well studied, however, the GHG emissions of highly abundant, small‐scale (<0.01 km2) agricultural dams (small stream and run‐off impoundments) are still unknown. Here, we measured the diffusive CO2 and CH4 flux of 77 small agricultural dams within south‐east Australia. The GHG emissions from these waterbodies, which are currently unaccounted for in GHG inventories, amounted to 11.12 ± 2.59 g CO2‐equivalent m2/day, a value 3.43 times higher than temperate reservoir emissions. Upscaling these results to the entire state of Victoria, Australia, resulted in a farm dam CO2‐equivalent/day emission rate of 4,853 tons, 3.1 times higher than state‐wide reservoir emissions in spite of farm dams covering only 0.94 times the comparative area. We also show that CO2 and CH4 emission rates were both significantly positively correlated with dissolved nitrate concentrations, and significantly higher in livestock rearing farm dams when compared to cropping farm dams. The results from this study demonstrate that small agricultural farm dams can be a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, thereby justifying their inclusion in global carbon budgets.

Through the microbial breakdown of organic matter and production of greenhouse gases (GHGs), small agricultural dams or ponds have recently been shown to make a relatively large contribution to freshwater ecosystem carbon cycling. However, current estimates of their total carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO 2 -e) emissions lack inclusion of both seasonal and diel fluctuations. In addition, the atmospheric emissions of nitrous oxide from these often eutrophic systems have yet to be established. Here, we quantified the diffusive winter emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) from 12 small agricultural dams within southeast Australia over a 24-h period. The winter CO 2 -e emissions of small agricultural water bodies were~92% lower than previous summer estimates, at 1.02 gÁm À2 Ád À1 , while N 2 O contributed just 3.2% of this total. We also show that diel cycles do not significantly affect winter CO 2 , CH 4 , or N 2 O emission rates, and we discuss the likely carbon sources to these systems, through analyses of stable carbon isotopes (d 13 C). The results from this study fill key gaps in our knowledge of agricultural dam GHG production and global atmospheric emissions, aiding their inclusion into future GHG budgets.

Seagrasses have some of the highest rates of carbon burial on the planet and have therefore been highlighted as ecosystems for nature-based climate change mitigation. However, information is still needed on the net radiative forcing benefit of seagrasses inclusive of their associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here, we report simultaneous estimates of seagrass-associated carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) air–water emissions. Applying in situ sampling within a south-east Australian seagrass ecosystem, this study finds atmospheric GHG emissions from waters above seagrasses to range from − 480 ± 15.96 to − 16.2 ± 8.32 mg CO2-equivalents m2 d−1 (net uptake), with large temporal and spatial variability. Using a combination of gas specific mass balance equations, dissolved stable carbon isotope values (δ13C) and in situ time-series data, CO2-e flux is estimated at − 21.74 mg m2 d−1. We find that the net release of CH4 (0.44 µmol m2 h−1) and net uptake of N2O (− 0.06 µmol m2 h−1) effectively negated each other at 16.12 and − 16.13 mg CO2-e m2 d−1, respectively. The results of this study indicate that temperate Australian seagrasses may function as net sinks of atmospheric CO2-e. These results contribute towards filling key emission accounting gaps both in the Australian region, and through the simultaneous measurement of the three key greenhouse gas species.

Natural Resource Management (NRM) is often conducted as a partnership between government and citizens. In Australia, government agencies formulate policy and fund implementation that may be delivered on-ground by community groups (such as Landcare). Since the late 1980s, over AUS$8b of Commonwealth investment has been made in NRM. However, quantitative evidence of environmental improvements is lacking. The NRM Planning Portal has been developed to (1) provide an online spatial information system for sharing Landcare and agency data; and (2) to facilitate NRM priority setting at local and regional planning scales. While the project successfully federates Landcare NRM activity data, challenges included (1) unstructured, non-standardised data, meaning that quantitative reporting against strategic objectives is not currently possible, and (2) a lack of common understanding about the value proposition for adopting the portal approach. Demonstrating the benefit of technology adoption is a key lesson for digital NRM planning.