ObjectiveSpousal clustering of diabetes merits attention. Whether old-age vulnerability or a shared family environment determines the concordance of diabetes is also uncertain. This study investigated the spousal concordance of diabetes and compared the risk of diabetes concordance between couples and noncouples by using nationally representative data.MethodsA total of 22,572 individuals identified from the 2002–2013 National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan constituted 5,643 couples and 5,643 noncouples through 1:1 dual propensity score matching (PSM). Factors associated with concordance in both spouses with diabetes were analyzed at the individual level. The risk of diabetes concordance between couples and noncouples was compared at the couple level. Logistic regression was the main statistical method. Statistical data were analyzed using SAS 9.4. C&RT and Apriori of data mining conducted in IBM SPSS Modeler 13 served as a supplement to statistics.ResultsHigh odds of the spousal concordance of diabetes were associated with old age, middle levels of urbanization, and high comorbidities (all P < 0.05). The dual PSM analysis revealed that the risk of diabetes concordance was significantly higher in couples (5.19%) than in noncouples (0.09%; OR = 61.743, P < 0.0001).ConclusionsA high concordance rate of diabetes in couples may indicate the influences of assortative mating and shared environment. Diabetes in a spouse implicates its risk in the partner. Family-based diabetes care that emphasizes the screening of couples at risk of diabetes by using the identified risk factors is suggested in prospective clinical practice interventions.
. Prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs before the index date were retrieved from a prescription database. We estimated the odds ratios (ORs) of NOD associated with antihypertensive drug use; nondiabetic subjects served as the reference group. A total of 4233 NOD cases were identified in 24,688 hypertensive patients during the study period. The risk of NOD after adjusting for sex and age was higher among users of diuretics (OR = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.20), beta-blockers (BBS; OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04-1.21), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs; OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18) than among nonusers. Patients who take angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.84-1.00), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB; OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.81-0.98), or alpha-blockers (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80-0.98) are at a lower risk of developing NOD than nonusers. Vasodilators were not associated with the risk of NOD. The results of this study suggest that hypertensive patients who take ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or alpha-blockers are at a lower risk of NOD. Diuretics, BBs, and CCBs were associated with a significant increase in the risk of NOD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.