Background Surgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue during COVID-19 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in periods of lockdown versus light restriction. Methods This international, prospective, cohort study enrolled 20 006 adult (≥18 years) patients from 466 hospitals in 61 countries with 15 cancer types, who had a decision for curative surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and were followed up until the point of surgery or cessation of follow-up (Aug 31, 2020). Average national Oxford COVID-19 Stringency Index scores were calculated to define the government response to COVID-19 for each patient for the period they awaited surgery, and classified into light restrictions (index <20), moderate lockdowns (20–60), and full lockdowns (>60). The primary outcome was the non-operation rate (defined as the proportion of patients who did not undergo planned surgery). Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to explore the associations between lockdowns and non-operation. Intervals from diagnosis to surgery were compared across COVID-19 government response index groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04384926 . Findings Of eligible patients awaiting surgery, 2003 (10·0%) of 20 006 did not receive surgery after a median follow-up of 23 weeks (IQR 16–30), all of whom had a COVID-19-related reason given for non-operation. Light restrictions were associated with a 0·6% non-operation rate (26 of 4521), moderate lockdowns with a 5·5% rate (201 of 3646; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·77–0·84; p<0·0001), and full lockdowns with a 15·0% rate (1775 of 11 827; HR 0·51, 0·50–0·53; p<0·0001). In sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for SARS-CoV-2 case notification rates, moderate lockdowns (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·80–0·88; p<0·001), and full lockdowns (0·57, 0·54–0·60; p<0·001), remained independently associated with non-operation. Surgery beyond 12 weeks from diagnosis in patients without neoadjuvant therapy increased during lockdowns (374 [9·1%] of 4521 in light restrictions, 317 [10·4%] of 3646 in moderate lockdowns, 2001 [23·8%] of 11 827 in full lockdowns), although there were no differences in resectability rates observed with longer delays. Interpretation Cancer surgery systems worldwide were fragile to lockdowns, with one in seven patients who were in regions with full lockdowns not undergoing planned surgery and experiencing longer preoperative delays. Although short-term oncological outcomes were not compromised in those selected for surgery, delays and non-operations might lead to long-term reductions in survival. During current and future periods of societal restriction, the resilience of elective surgery systems requires strengthening, which might include...

Background Teledermatology (TD) has emerged as a critical way of delivering care remotely in the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective We conducted a systematic review to assess how TD has been implemented worldwide. Methods We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar for articles on the use of TD for patient care, written in English and published from December 1 st 2019 to October 15 th 2020. Results 27 studies were included, involving 16,981 patients. There was significant uptake of TD during the pandemic. Synchronous TD appeared to be more commonly implemented than asynchronous TD. Common ambulatory dermatoses such as acne or eczema were reported to be more amenable to TD assessment and management. TD also appeared to be useful for the diagnosis of cutaneous involvement of COVID-19 infection and follow-up of stable onco-dermatology cases. Limitations Pooled analysis of all relevant outcomes was not always possible due to the heterogeneity in methodologies of included studies. Conclusions TD is a useful and convenient tool for the management of common ambulatory dermatoses in the COVID-19 pandemic.

No abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a complex autoimmune disorder characterized by the production of pathogenic anti-nuclear antibodies. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that the introgression of a New Zealand Black-derived chromosome 4 interval onto a lupus-prone background suppresses the disease. Interestingly, the same genetic interval promoted the expansion of both Natural Killer T- and CD5(+) B cells in suppressed mice. In this study, we show that ablation of NKT cells with a CD1d knockout had no impact on either the suppression of lupus or the expansion of CD5(+) B cells. On the other hand, suppressed mice had an expanded population of IL-10-producing B cells that predominantly localized to the CD5(+)CD1d(low) compartment. The expansion of CD5(+) B cells negatively correlated with the frequency of pro-inflammatory IL-17 A-producing T-cells and kidney damage. Adoptive transfer with a single injection of total B cells with an enriched CD5(+) compartment reduced the frequency of memory/activated, IFNγ-producing, and IL-17 A-producing CD4 T-cells but did not significantly reduce autoantibody levels. Taken together, these data suggest that the expansion of CD5(+) IL-10-producing B cells and not NKT cells protects against lupus in these mice, by limiting the expansion of pro-inflammatory IL-17 A- and IFNγ-producing CD4 T-cells.