Whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can improve patient survival while reducing local tumor recurrence. Although standard breast radiotherapy can achieve good tumor control and cosmetic effects with low toxicity, the 5-to 7-week treatment time is relatively long for patients and can result in wasted medical resources. Therefore, there is a growing trend toward hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), which accelerates partial-breast irradiation. Both short-course radiotherapy and conventional fractionated radiotherapy are safe and effective treatment modes, with similar survival and local tumor control effects as those of conventional radiotherapy (CRT), and adverse reactions can be tolerated.Compared with conventional fractionated radiotherapy, short-course radiotherapy saves medical resources and has a shorter total treatment time, reduced treatment costs, and an improved quality of life for patients.
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical factors relevant to the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer who received intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).MethodsThe data of 60 patients admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to December 2015 with pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received IMRT. Patients were divided into groups according to two‐year survival: those who survived > 2 years after treatment, and those who died within 2 years of treatment. The potential clinical factors relevant to prognosis were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.ResultsSingle factor analysis showed that lesion length (P < 0.05), tumor diameter (P < 0.05), T stage (P < 0.05), N stage (P < 0.05), and combined chemotherapy (P < 0.05) were associated with the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients who received IMRT. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that T stage (odds ratio = 3.62; P < 0.05) and N stage (odds ratio = 2.98; P < 0.05) were independent factors relevant to prognosis.ConclusionT stage and N stage influence the long‐term curative effects of IMRT for esophageal cancer. The higher the stage, the lower the two‐year survival rate.
Purpose. To observe the remission rate and side effects of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy in patients with brain metastasis of driver gene-negative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. 152 patients with NSCLC brain metastasis admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the research objects. Patients were divided into a single group (85 cases) and a combined group (67 cases) according to treatment methods. The therapeutic effects and side effects of the single group and combined group were compared. In addition, the patients who received immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy were divided into three subgroups: A, B, and C, and the therapeutic effects and side effects of different radiotherapy modes were compared among group A [whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT)], group B (WBRT combined with local radiotherapy) and group C (local radiotherapy). Results. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in the combined group were higher than those in the single group ( P < 0.05 ). The incidence of reactive capillary hyperplasia and immune-related pneumonia in the combined group were higher than that in the single group ( P < 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of other side effects between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). ORR and DCR in group B were higher than those in group A ( P < 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects among the three groups ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusion. Immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy is effective in patients with brain metastasis of driver gene-negative NSCLC, which can improve the disease control rate without increasing the side effects. In addition, WBRT combined with local push radiotherapy is effective and safe. Clinical Study Registration Number. The Clinical study registration number is K2019086.
Background Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. Patients with advanced esophageal cancer often cannot be treated by surgery; in these cases, radiation therapy is usually applied. However, there are currently few studies on the clinical efficacy of this treatment method. The present study aimed to investigate and observe the clinical efficacy and related prognostic factors of simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) in esophageal squamous carcinoma, and to provide a reference for clinicians in radiotherapy (RT) departments. Methods The clinical and follow-up data of 220 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed to assess the relevant prognostic factors and analyze their effects on 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The prognostic influencing factors were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox multi-factor regression analysis. Results The median follow-up time was 56.0 months (3.0 to 66.0 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 68.6%, 49.1%, and 36.3%, respectively, for the entire cohort, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 52.3%, 37.7%, and 25.5%, respectively. The median OS time was 24 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.16–28.84 months] and the median PFS time was 15 months (95% CI: 11.04–18.96 months). The multifactorial analysis results showed that gender, RT dose, treatment modality, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and gross tumor volume (GTV) were independent prognostic factors affecting 3-year OS (P<0.05); while gender, N-stage, RT dose, and GTV were independent prognostic factors affecting 3-year PFS (P<0.05). Conclusions In the SIB-IMRT era, the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with radical (chemo)radiotherapy is relatively satisfactory. As a single-institution study on radiation therapy for esophageal cancer, this study yielded accurate results that help to provide references for subsequent related studies and clinicians’ selection of treatment options.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.