Purpose: To compare demographic data, clinical and radiological characteristics, treatment, and long-term visual outcomes between myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibodypositive optic neuritis (MOG-IgG + ON) and aquaporin-4 autoantibody-positive optic neuritis (AQP4-IgG + ON) in Thailand. Patients and Methods: We included individuals who were diagnosed with either MOG-IgG + ON or AQP4-IgG + ON over an 11-year period. Demographic data, clinical and radiological characteristics at ON presentation, treatment, and long-term visual outcomes were retrospectively collected. Results: There were 16 patients (28 eyes) and 43 patients (59 eyes) in the MOG-IgG + ON and AQP4-IgG + ON groups, respectively. AQP4-IgG + ON occurred predominantly in female patients whereas MOG-IgG + ON-affected female patients and male patients equally (p < 0.001). Prior or concurrent non-ON demyelinating events were more often observed at AQP4-IgG + ON onset (p < 0.001). At ON presentation, bilaterality and the presence of optic disc edema were predominantly found in the MOG-IgG + ON group (bilaterality: 80% vs 8%, MOG-IgG + ON vs AQP4-IgG + ON patients, respectively (p < 0.001); presence of optic disc edema: 92.3% vs 36.6%, MOG-IgG + ON-vs AQP4-IgG + ON-affected eyes, respectively (p < 0.001)). There was no statistically significant difference in age at ON onset, nadir visual acuity (VA), presence of pain, segmental enhancement, and total enhanced segments of the anterior visual pathways. At the last follow-up, immunosuppressive drugs were used more often in the AQP4-IgG + ON group (43.7% vs 74.4%, MOG-IgG + ON vs AQP4-IgG + ON, respectively; p < 0.027). Remarkably better final VA was achieved in MOG-IgG + ON-affected eyes (median: 0.0 vs 0.4 logMAR, MOG-IgG + ON-vs AQP4-IgG + ON-affected eyes, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Compared with AQP4-IgG + ON, MOG-IgG + ON tended to present with bilaterality and optic disc edema and demonstrated better visual outcomes.
Objective To compare demographic data, clinical and radiological characteristics, treatments, and long-term visual outcomes between patients with late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (LO-NMOSD-ON) (age at onset ≥ 50 years) and patients with early-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (EO-NMOSD-ON) (age at onset < 50 years). Patients and Methods This retrospective study included 47 patients (69 eyes) who were diagnosed with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON) over a 12-year period. There were 14 patients (21 eyes) and 33 patients (48 eyes) in the LO-NMOSD-ON and EO-NMOSD-ON groups, respectively. Results LO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes exhibited significantly worse median nadir visual acuity (VA) at optic neuritis (ON) onset, compared with EO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes (2.7 logMAR (range 2.6–2.9 logMAR) vs 1.95 logMAR (range 0.4–2.9 logMAR); p = 0.03). Similarly, 100% of LO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes demonstrated a nadir VA of worse than or equal to 1.0 logMAR, compared with 62.5% of EO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes ( p = 0.03). LO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes had a worse median final VA, compared with EO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes (1.3 logMAR (range 0–2.9 logMAR) vs 0.3 logMAR (range 0–2.9 logMAR); adjusted p = 0.037). LO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes more frequently exhibited a final VA of worse than or equal to 1.0 logMAR, compared with EO-NMOSD-ON–affected eyes (57.1% vs 27.0%; adjusted p = 0.039). A positive correlation was observed between age at ON onset of each eye and the final VA (logMAR) (Spearman r = 0.34, p = 0.0075). The remaining parameters did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusion Patients with LO-NMOSD-ON had significantly worse nadir VA at ON onset and significantly worse final VA, relative to patients with EO-NMOSD-ON. Age at ON onset of each eye was positively correlated with final VA (logMAR). Despite the difference in common age at onset, NMOSD-ON should be included in the differential diagnosis of late-onset acute to subacute optic neuropathy, along with ischemic optic neuropathy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.