Key Points• The baseline characteristics of multirefractory ITP differed from "typical" ITP, outcome was severe, and was associated with high morbidity and mortality.• Combining immunosuppressant therapy with a thrombopoietinreceptor agonist may be a relevant option for these patients.Refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) was previously defined as lack of a minimum response to splenectomy and the requirement for long-term treatment to reduce the risk of significant bleeding events. In this multicenter study, we included 37 patients with multirefractory ITP, defined as no response to splenectomy, rituximab, romiplostim, and eltrombopag. As compared with a historical cohort of 183 ITP patients, matched on the calendar year of ITP diagnosis with a 5:1 ratio, patients with multirefractory ITP were more likely to have secondary ITP (odds ratio [OR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-17.86; P 5 .018) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (OR, 5.94; 95% CI, 1.08-32.48; P 5 .04). The median duration of ITP before being recognized as multirefractory was 78 months (range, 6-450). The patients showed failure of a median of 10.5 prior treatment lines for ITP (range, 6-15). At the end of follow-up (median, 84 months; range, 12-455), only 1/14 patients achieved response with immunosuppressant therapy alone. By contrast, 7/10 patients achieved response with a combination of immunosuppressant therapy and thrombopoietin-receptor agonists that lasted for a median of 15 months (range, 6-32). Throughout the course of ITP, 5/37 patients died, 3 with ITP (bleeding, n 5 2; sepsis n 5 1); 15 (40%) had at least 1 bacterial infection and 9 (24%) at least 1 episode of thrombosis. In conclusion, multirefractory ITP was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Combining an immunosuppressant therapy with thrombopoietin-receptor agonists may be a good strategy for management for these patients with severe disease. (Blood. 2016;128(12):1625-1630

Immunocompromised individuals such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients are at risk of impaired immune responses to vaccination. The objective of our study was to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses in CLL patients, after the first, second and third doses of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, and after a single dose for patients with confirmed prior COVID-19. Five hundred and thirty patients were included in the study. Patients received 2 doses at a 4-week interval, and a third dose if seronegative after the second dose. Response rate was 27% post-dose 1 and 52% post-dose 2. Post-dose 2 treatment-naïve patients had the highest response rate (72%) followed by patients previously treated by chemoimmunotherapy (60%). Among patients on therapy, patients on BTKi alone (22%) or in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies or venetoclax (0%) had the poorer response rate whereas patients on venetoclax monotherapy achieved a significantly higher response rate (52%). A multivariate analysis identified as independent predictors of the absence of seroconversion: age >65 years, ongoing CLL treatment and gamma-globulins ≤6g/L. Post-dose 2 seronegative patients had a global post-dose 3 response rate of 35%. This study provides an argument for the use of a third dose and for prophylactic SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies.

SummaryA large, multicentre, retrospective survey of patients with hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) was conducted in France to determine the frequency of second malignancies and to analyse the long-term effects of the established purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs), cladribine and pentostatin. The survey retrospectively reviewed the medical history of patients and their immediate family, clinical and biological presentation at the time of HCL diagnosis, treatment choice, response to treatment, time to relapse and cause of death. Data were collected for 487 patients with HCL. Of the patients included in the survey, 18% (88/487) had a familial history of cancers, 8% (41/487) presented with malignancies before HCL diagnosis and 10% (48/487) developed second malignancies after HCL was diagnosed. An excess incidence of second malignancies was observed, with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1Á86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1Á34-2Á51), with no significant difference between PNAs. For second haematological malignancies alone, the SIR was markedly increased at 5Á32 (95% CI: 2Á90-8Á92). This study highlights the high frequency of cancers in HCL patients and their family members. The frequency of second malignancies is notably increased, particularly for haematological malignancies. The respective role of pentostatin and cladribine in the development of second malignancies is debatable.

Key Points• A half loss of RUNX1 activity leads to defects in primitive erythropoiesis, megakaryopoiesis, and proplatelet formation.• An almost complete loss of RUNX1 activity leads to the amplification of the granulomonocytic compartment with increased genomic instability.To explore how RUNX1 mutations predispose to leukemia, we generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from 2 pedigrees with germline RUNX1 mutations. The first, carrying a missense R174Q mutation, which acts as a dominant-negative mutant, is associated with thrombocytopenia and leukemia, and the second, carrying a monoallelic gene deletion inducing a haploinsufficiency, presents only as thrombocytopenia. Hematopoietic differentiation of these iPSC clones demonstrated profound defects in erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis and deregulated expression of RUNX1 targets. iPSC clones from patients with the R174Q mutation specifically generated an increased amount of granulomonocytes, a phenotype reproduced by an 80% RUNX1 knockdown in the H9 human embryonic stem cell line, and a genomic instability. This phenotype, found only with a lower dosage of RUNX1, may account for development of leukemia in patients. Altogether, RUNX1 dosage could explain the differential phenotype according to RUNX1 mutations, with a haploinsufficiency leading to thrombocytopenia alone in a majority of cases whereas a more complete gene deletion predisposes to leukemia. (Blood. 2015; 125(6):930-940)