This paper reports two experiments concerning the stimulus specificity of pitch discrimination learning. In experiment 1, listeners were initially trained, during ten sessions (about 11,000 trials), to discriminate a monaural pure tone of 3000 Hz from ipsilateral pure tones with slightly different frequencies. The resulting perceptual learning (improvement in discrimination thresholds) appeared to be frequency-specific since, in subsequent sessions, new learning was observed when the 3000-Hz standard tone was replaced by a standard tone of 1200 Hz, or 6500 Hz. By contrast, a subsequent presentation of the initial tones to the contralateral ear showed that the initial learning was not, or was only weakly, ear-specific. In experiment 2, training in pitch discrimination was initially provided using complex tones that consisted of harmonics 3-7 of a missing fundamental (near 100 Hz for some listeners, 500 Hz for others). Subsequently, the standard complex was replaced by a standard pure tone with a frequency which could be either equal to the standard complex's missing fundamental or remote from it. In the former case, the two standard stimuli were matched in pitch. However, this perceptual relationship did not appear to favor the transfer of learning. Therefore, the results indicated that pitch discrimination learning is, at least to some extent, timbre-specific, and cannot be viewed as a reduction of an internal noise which would affect directly the output of a neural device extracting pitch from both pure tones and complex tones including low-rank harmonics.

In three experiments, untrained listeners made same/different judgments on pairs of pure or complex tones with periods that eventually differed by +/- 4%. On each trial, the two test tones were separated by 4.3 s, during which other tones (I) were heard but had to be ignored. The period (p) of the first test tone was randomly selected between 1/600 and 1/300 s. The period of each I tone was randomly selected among four possible values, close to p (+/- 3% or 6% apart) in some conditions, and remote from p in other conditions. In addition, from condition to condition, the spectral content of the I tones was varied independently of their periods: The I tones could have the same harmonic content as the test tones, or a very different harmonic content. Subjects' performances were much better when the periods of the I tones were remote from p than when they were close to p, as expected from previous findings by D. Deutsch [e.g., Science 175, 1020-1022 (1972)]. But, more importantly, the relation between the spectral contents of the I tones and the test tones had, by itself, practically no effect on performance. Thus performance was affected by the pitches of the I tones, but not by their timbres. These results suggest that pitch is processed independently of timbre in auditory short-term memory.

It is commonly assumed that one can always assign a direction-upward or downward-to a percept of pitch change. The present study shows that this is true for some, but not all, listeners. Frequency difference limens (FDLs, in cents) for pure tones roved in frequency were measured in two conditions. In one condition, the task was to detect frequency changes; in the other condition, the task was to identify the direction of frequency changes. For three listeners, the identification FDL was about 1.5 times smaller than the detection FDL, as predicted (counterintuitively) by signal detection theory under the assumption that performance in the two conditions was limited by one and the same internal noise. For three other listeners, however, the identification FDL was much larger than the detection FDL. The latter listeners had relatively high detection FDLs. They had no difficulty in identifying the direction of just-detectable changes in intensity, or in the frequency of amplitude modulation. Their difficulty in perceiving the direction of small frequency/pitch changes showed up not only when the task required absolute judgments of direction, but also when the directions of two successive frequency changes had to be judged as identical or different.

The decays of pitch traces and loudness traces in short-term auditory memory were compared in forced-choice discrimination experiments. The two stimuli presented on each trial were separated by a variable delay (D); they consisted of pure tones, series of resolved harmonics, or series of unresolved harmonics mixed with lowpass noise. A roving procedure was employed in order to minimize the influence of context coding. During an initial phase of each experiment, frequency and intensity discrimination thresholds [P(C) = 0.80] were measured with an adaptive staircase method while D was fixed at 0.5 s. The corresponding physical differences (in cents or dB) were then constantly presented at four values of D: 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 s. In the case of intensity discrimination, performance (d') markedly decreased when D increased from 0.5 to 2 s, but was not further reduced when D was longer. In the case of frequency discrimination, the decline of performance as a function of D was significantly less abrupt. This divergence suggests that pitch and loudness are processed in separate modules of auditory memory.

The memory trace of the pitch sensation induced by a standard tone (S) can be strongly degraded by subsequently intervening sounds (I). Deutsch [Science 168, 1604-1605 (1970)] suggested that the degradation is much weaker when the I sounds are words than when they are tones. In Deutsch's study, however, the pitch relations between S and the I words were not controlled. The first experiment reported here was similar to that of Deutsch except that the speech and nonspeech stimuli used as I sounds were matched in pitch. The speech stimuli were monosyllabic words derived from recordings of a real voice, whereas the nonspeech stimuli were harmonic complex tones with a flat spectral profile. These two kinds of I sound were presented at a variable pitch distance (delta-pitch) from the S tone. In a same/different paradigm, S had to be compared with a tone presented 6 s later; this comparison tone could be either identical to S or shifted in pitch by +/- 75 cents. The nature of the I sounds (spoken words versus tones) affected discrimination performance, but markedly less than did delta-pitch. Performance was better when delta-pitch was large than when it was small, for the speech as well as nonspeech I sounds. In a second experiment, the S sounds and comparison sounds were spoken words instead of tones. The differences to be detected were restricted to shifts in fundamental frequency (and thus pitch), the other acoustic attributes of the words being left unchanged. Again, discrimination performance was positively related to delta-pitch. This time, the nature of the I sounds (words versus tones) had no significant effect. Overall, the results suggest that, in auditory short-term memory, the pitch of speech sounds is not stored differently from the pitch of nonspeech sounds.