Transcriptional riboswitches involve RNA aptamers that are typically found in the 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of bacterial mRNAs and form alternative secondary structures upon binding to cognate ligands. Alteration of the riboswitch's secondary structure results in perturbations of an adjacent expression platform that controls transcription elongation and termination, thus turning downstream gene expression “on” or “off.” Riboswitch ligands are typically small metabolites, divalent cations, anions, signaling molecules, or other RNAs, and can be part of larger signaling cascades. The interconnectedness of ligand binding, RNA folding, RNA transcription, and gene expression empowers riboswitches to integrate cellular processes and environmental conditions across multiple timescales. For a successful response to an environmental cue that may determine a bacterium's chance of survival, a coordinated coupling of timescales from microseconds to minutes must be achieved. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of how riboswitches affect such critical gene expression control across time.

No abstract

Despite sharing a highly conserved core architecture with their prokaryotic counterparts, eukaryotic multisubunit RNA polymerases (Pols) have undergone structural divergence and biological specialization. Interesting examples of structural divergence are the A12.2 and C11 subunits of Pols I and III, respectively. Whereas all known cellular Pols possess cognate protein factors that stimulate cleavage of the nascent RNA, Pols I and III have incorporated their cleavage factors as bona fide subunits. Although it is not yet clear why these polymerases have incorporated their cleavage factors as subunits, a picture is emerging that identifies roles for these subunits beyond providing nucleolytic activity. Specifically, it appears that both A12.2 and C11 are required for efficient termination of transcription by Pols I and III. Given that termination involves destabilization of the elongation complex (EC), we tested whether A12.2 influences stability of the Pol I EC. Using, to our knowledge, a novel assay to measure EC dissociation kinetics, we have determined that A12.2 is an intrinsic destabilizer of the Pol I EC. In addition, the salt concentration dependence of Pol I EC dissociation kinetics suggests that A12.2 alters electrostatic interactions within the EC. Importantly, these data present a mechanistic basis for the requirement of A12.2 in Pol I termination. Combined with recent work demonstrating the direct involvement of A12.2 in Pol I nucleotide incorporation, this study further supports the concept that A12.2 cannot be viewed solely as a cleavage factor.

Eukaryotic cells express at least three nuclear RNA polymerases (Pols), each with a unique set of gene targets. Though these enzymes are homologous, there are many differences among the Pols. In this study, a novel assay for Pol I transcription elongation was developed to probe enzymatic differences among the Pols. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a mutation in the universally conserved hinge region of the trigger loop, E1103G, induces a gain of function in the Pol II elongation rate, whereas the corresponding mutation in Pol I, E1224G, results in a loss of function. The E1103G Pol II mutation stabilizes the closed conformation of the trigger loop, promoting the catalytic step, the putative rate-limiting step for Pol II. In single-nucleotide and multinucleotide addition assays, we observe a decrease in the rate of nucleotide addition and dinucleotide cleavage activity by E1224G Pol I and an increase in the rate of misincorporation. Collectively, these data suggest that Pol I is at least in part rate-limited by the same step as Pol II, the catalytic step.