The peptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) binds to the AT 1 (angiotensin type 1) receptor within the transmembrane domains in an extended conformation, and its C-terminal residue interacts with transmembrane domain VII at Phe-293/Asn-294. The molecular environment of this binding pocket remains to be elucidated. The preferential binding of benzophenone photolabels to methionine residues in the target structure has enabled us to design an experimental approach called the methionine proximity assay, which is based on systematic mutagenesis and photolabeling to determine the molecular environment of this binding pocket. The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) 1 (Fig. 1A) is the active component of the renin-angiotensin system. Virtually all known physiological effects of AngII are produced through the activation of the hAT 1 receptor, which belongs to the class A rhodopsin-like family of the heptahelical G proteincoupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily (1, 2). Elucidating the stereochemistry of the ligand-receptor interaction is vital for understanding the mechanism of ligand binding, GPCR activation, and, eventually, rational drug design.In the past, much effort was devoted to identifying the domains or individual residues of a given receptor that may interact with its ligand. Most experiments to address ligandreceptor interactions were performed with series of receptor mutants to identify specific residues critical to ligand binding (3-5). It is, however, speculative to deduce precise structures of ligand-receptor interactions through mutagenesis studies alone. More direct approaches have therefore been used to study ligand-receptor interactions. Among these is photoaffinity labeling, which allows covalent incorporation of the ligand within its binding site, presumably at the contact area of the photolabel in the receptor. This ligand-receptor contact can be identified by specific enzymatic or chemical digestion of the labeled receptor (6) or by mass spectrometry (7). The binding pockets within the transmembrane domains of several bioamine receptors have been identified using this kind of approach. The adenosine A 1 receptor (8) and the ␤ 2 adrenergic receptor (9, 10) are typical examples. Peptidergic receptors such as hAT 1 and hAT 2 (11, 12), neurokinin receptors (13), and several other receptors from the secretin GPCR family B (14) have been also studied using this approach. We previously identified ligandcontact points within the second extracellular loop (ECL) and the seventh transmembrane domain (TMD) of the hAT 1 receptor (12,15,16). Although photoaffinity labeling has been widely used to study peptidergic GPCR binding pockets, generally only a single contact point between a given ligand and its cognate receptor has been identified. The resulting information does not, however, induce sufficient restrictions to generate credible GPCR structures in the ligand-bound state using homology modeling.Labeling studies using benzophenone residues have identified many ligand-receptor contact points with a surpris...

No abstract

The larger dispersion of I(Na) amplitude within the female cardiac ventricle may contribute to the higher risk of arrhythmias in females. Testosterone modulates this dispersion. By decreasing the transmural dispersion of I(Na), testosterone may exert a protective effect against LQTS-related arrhythmias in males.

Apelin, a ligand of the G protein-coupled putative angiotensin II-like receptor (APJ-R), exerts strong vasodilating, cardiac inotropic and chronotropic actions. Its expression is highly up-regulated during heart failure. Apelin also increases cardiac conduction speed and excitability. While our knowledge of apelin cardiovascular actions is growing, our understanding of the physiological mechanisms behind the cardiac effects remains limited. We tested the effects of apelin on the cardiac sodium current (INa) using patch clamp technique on cardiac myocytes acutely dissociated from dog ventricle. We found that apelin-13 and apelin-17 increased peak INa by 39% and 61% and shifted its mid-activation potential by −6.8 ± 0.6 mV and −17 ± 1 mV respectively thus increasing channel opening at negative voltage. Apelin also slowed INa recovery from inactivation. The effects of apelin on INa amplitude were linked to activation of protein kinase C. Apelin also increased INa “window” current by up to 600% suggesting that changes in intracellular sodium may contribute to the apelin inotropic effects. Our results reveal for the first time the effects of apelin on INa. These effects are likely to modulate cardiac conduction and excitability and may have beneficial antiarrhythmic action in sodium chanelopathies such as Brugada Syndrome where INa amplitude is reduced.

Several models of activation mechanisms were proposed for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet no direct methods exist for their elucidation. The availability of constitutively active mutants has given an opportunity to study active receptor conformations within acceptable limits using models such as the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)1 receptor mutant N111G-hAT1 which displays an important constitutive activity. Recently, by using methionine proximity assay, we showed for the hAT1 receptor that TMD III, VI, and VII form the ligand-binding pocket of the C-terminal amino acid of an antagonistic AngII analogue. In the present contribution, we investigated whether the same residues would also constitute the ligand-binding contacts in constitutively activated mutant (CAM) receptors. For this purpose, the same Met mutagenesis strategy was carried out on the N111G double mutants. Analysis of 43 receptors mutants in the N111G-hAT1 series, photolabeled and CNBr digested, showed that there were only subtle structural changes between the wt-receptor and its constitutively active form.