This study examined the relationships between posttraumatic growth (PTG) and posttraumatic depreciation (PTD) across 10 countries and assessed the factorial invariance of the standardized inventory assessing PTG and PTD, the PTGDI-X, the expansion of the PTGI-X (Tedeschi et al., 2017). We also investigated the roles of social and cognitive factors in PTG and PTD. Data were collected from participants who identified that their most stressful life experience met the definition of trauma in Australia,
BackgroundMultiple health behaviour change (MHBC) interventions are proposed to be an effective and efficient way of intervening to manage and/or prevent chronic conditions, both with patients (targeting health-related behaviours, e.g. diet, smoking) and healthcare professionals (targeting clinical behaviours, e.g. advice, examine). However, their effectiveness is still unclear. Therefore, a review of these interventions in this context is warranted. Two interrelated systematic reviews of MHBC interventions will be conducted, one targeting health-related behaviours of patients with chronic conditions and another one targeting clinical behaviours of healthcare professionals.Materials and methods These systematic reviews will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic search for MHBC interventions for patients will be performed in Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Cochrane, and a systematic search for healthcare professionals will be conducted in the same databases. Studies from previous reviews will also be consulted. We will include randomised trials, in which interventions aim to change more than one behaviour (health-related for patients, clinical for HCPs). Components of the interventions will be extracted by using existing standardised classifications, such as ontologies (e.g. mode of delivery) and taxonomies (e.g. behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1), and the Cochrane Collaboration revised tool of Risk of Bias will be applied to perform risk of bias assessment. The components of included interventions will be synthesised and links between them will be mapped to identify trends and gaps. If sufficient comparable studies are included, a meta-analysis will be performed in both reviews. Systematic reviews registrationsCRD42022327085 and CRD42022327108
Background: The Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) is the most widely used classification of behaviour change techniques (BCTs), contributing to the accurate report and evaluation of behaviour change interventions and accumulation of evidence. Purpose: This study reports a structured approach to adapt the BCTTv1 into European Portuguese (BCTTv1-PT).Methods: A collaborative and iterative approach was used. The translation process encompassed four phases: (1) independent forward translation by two native Portuguese speakers proficient in English, (2) forward translation reconciliation, (3) expert consultation by involving seven experts in behaviour change to collect feedback on the draft version of the taxonomy through a structured online form; and (4) feedback analysis and improvement of the BCTTv1-PT. Results: Independent forward translations and a reconciled version of the BCTTv1-PT were produced. All experts agreed with the groupings designation (100%). Recommendations were made to improve BCTs labels, definitions and/or examples in all groupings, except for Feedback and monitoring. Experts disagreed with the translated definitions in 40.9% of the BCTs (38/93), with examples in 21.5% (20/93) and with labels in 11.8% (11/93). Recommendations were made for all instances where there was disagreement (n = 69) and were enacted entirety, yielding the final version (BCTTv1-PT).Conclusion: Researchers, educators, students and health and other professionals will be able to standardise terminology and have a common language, contributing to the impact of the BCTTv1-PT. This study presents a systematic and rigorous approach for the adaptation of the BCTTv1 and similar taxonomies, which may guide others.
Objetivo O objetivo do estudo é contribuir para a validação do Questionário de Avaliação dos Fatores Associados ao Aconselhamento na Diabetes do Tipo 2 (CSRBQ), que avalia os fatores psicossociais envolvidos na prestação de aconselhamento nutricional, de atividade física e de educação continuada (e.g., autoeficácia). Método Foi utilizada uma metodologia mista, com recurso a questionário e entrevistas individuais com profissionais de saúde. Primeiro foram feitas análises à sensibilidade e fiabilidade do instrumento numa amostra de 74 profissionais de saúde envolvidos diretamente na consulta de Diabetes do Tipo 2 (médicos e enfermeiros); posteriormente, foi feita uma análise facial do instrumento através da análise de conteúdo de 17 entrevistas individuais. Resultados A versão portuguesa do CSRBQ apresenta medidas descritivas e consistência interna aceitáveis para quase todas as escalas e, de um modo geral, foi bem aceite e interpretada pelos profissionais de saúde. A análise das entrevistas sugere a necessidade de ajustamento do questionário ao nível da sua organização e clarificação. Conclusão O CSRBQ pode oferecer informação relevante acerca das barreiras e facilitadores à prestação de aconselhamento pelos profissionais de saúde na diabetes do tipo 2.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.