Background Nurses are the primary activators of the medical emergency team (MET). Although the MET system can empower nurses to seek help in managing acutely ill patients, few data on nurses' beliefs about the system are available. Objective To evaluate nurses' beliefs and behaviors about the MET system. Methods Nurses from a large academic hospital in Canada were surveyed (2 demography-related questions and 17 Likert-scale questions). Results Of 614 nurses employed on units participating in the MET system, 293 (47.7%) were approached and 275 completed the survey (response rate, 93.9%). Most respondents (84.2%) believed that the MET could prevent cardiopulmonary arrest in acutely ill patients, and 94% believed that the MET allowed them to seek help for patients they were worried about. Most nurses (75.9%) would call the responsible physician before activating the MET. Fifteen percent indicated reluctance to activate the MET because of fear of criticism, but only 2.2% considered the MET overused. Most (81.3%) believed that the MET did not increase their workload, and 91.3% did not believe that the MET reduced their skills. Forty-eight percent of nurses indicated that they would activate the MET for a patient they were worried about, even if the patient had normal vital signs. Conclusion Nurses value the MET system. Nurses believe that the MET can help them care for acutely ill patients and improve outcomes. However, barriers to MET activation exist, including a fear of criticism and an adherence to a more traditional model of first contacting the responsible physician before activating the MET.
We have defined the incidence of CR-BSI in a cohort of patients from a tertiary referral hospital, the rates comparing favourably with those reported for similar populations. We were unable to demonstrate significant differences in any patient or catheter variables between those with and without CR-BSI. The AOLC test used alone was unhelpful as a method to diagnose in situ CVC infection in this patient population.
The impact of developing guidelines for laboratory testing in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was examined. Targeted blood tests were recorded on fifty cardiac surgery and fifty general intensive care patients retrospectively. Following the introduction of guidelines, the study was repeated with prospective data collection. Comparison of the samples before and after the intervention showed a 25.9% reduction in all blood tests and a 17.1% reduction in arterial blood gases in the post cardiac surgery group. In general ICU patients, the drop in all tests was 16.6% and in arterial blood gases 21.9%. The cost savings from the cardiac surgery sample was N.Z.$3,637 and general ICU N.Z.$3,166, giving a sum total of N.Z.$6,803 in 100 patients. The potential cost savings for the annual admissions of 1,200 patients is N.Z.$81,636. This study shows that written guidelines can bring about major cost reduction in the short-term.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.