PAT + reduced the weekly and total GWG in SED African American women with overweight or obesity at the start of pregnancy.

Purpose Implantation failure is a major limiting factor of successful in vitro fertilization (IVF). The objective of this study was to determine if endometrial mechanical stimulation (EMS) by endometrial biopsy in the luteal phase of the cycle prior to embryo transfer (ET) improves clinical outcomes in an unselected subfertile population. Methods Double-blind, randomized controlled trial of EMS versus sham biopsy and odds of clinical pregnancy after IVF and embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous miscarriage and live birth. Results One hundred women enrolled and were randomized from 2013 to 2017. Enrollment was terminated after futility analysis showed no difference in clinical pregnancy between EMS versus control, 47.2% vs 61.7% (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.25-1.23, p = 0.15). There were no significant differences between women who underwent EMS and those who did not in terms of positive pregnancy test 54.7% vs 63.8% (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.31-1.53, p = 0.36), miscarriage 7.5% vs 2.1% (OR 3.76 95% CI 0.41-34.85, p = 0.22), or live birth 43.4% vs 61.7% (OR 0.48 95% CI 0.21-1.06, p = 0.07). Conclusions EMS in the luteal phase of the cycle preceding embryo transfer does not improve clinical outcomes in an unselected subfertile population and may result in a lower live birth rate. We caution the routine use of EMS in an unselected population.

IMPORTANCE Two-thirds of women in labor receive supplemental oxygen to reverse perceived fetal hypoxemia and prevent acidemia. Oxygen is routinely administered for category II fetal heart tracings, a class of fetal tracing used to designate intermediate risk for acidemia. This liberal use of oxygen may not be beneficial, particularly because neonatal hyperoxygenation is harmful. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that room air is noninferior to oxygen in improving fetal metabolic status among patients with category II fetal heart tracings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a randomized, unblinded noninferiority clinical trial conducted between June 2016 and July 2017 in the labor and delivery ward of a single tertiary care center. Women with singleton pregnancies at 37 weeks' gestational age or more who were admitted for delivery were eligible. Of those who met inclusion criteria, the patients who developed category II tracings in labor that necessitated intrauterine resuscitation were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to room air or oxygen. Analyses were intention-to-treat. INTERVENTIONS The oxygen group received 10 L of oxygen per minute by nonrebreather facemask until delivery. The room air group was exposed to room air only without a facemask. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was umbilical artery lactate, a marker of metabolic acidosis and neonatal morbidity. Noninferiority was defined as a mean difference between groups of less than 9.0 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L). Secondary outcomes were other umbilical artery gases, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status, and operative vaginal delivery. RESULTS Of the 705 patients who met inclusion criteria, 277 (39.3%) were enrolled on admission. During labor, 114 patients (41.2% of the enrolled patients) developed category II tracings and were randomized to room air (57 patients; 50.0% of the randomized patients) or oxygen (57 patients; 50.0% of the randomized patients). A total of 99 patients (86.8% of the randomized patients) with paired cord gases were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The 99 patients included 76 African American women (77%); mean (SD) age was 27.3 (6.3) years in the oxygen group and 27.8 (5.3) years in the room air group. There was no difference in umbilical artery lactate between the group on oxygen and the group on room air (mean, 30.6 mg/dL [95% CI, 27.0 to 34.2 mg/dL] vs 31.5 mg/dL [95% CI, 27.9 to 36.0 mg/dL]); P = .69). The mean difference in lactate was 0.9 mg/dL (95% CI, −4.5 to 6.3 mg/dL), which was within the noninferiority margin. There was no difference in other umbilical artery gas components or mode of delivery between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with category II fetal heart tracings, intrauterine resuscitation with room air is noninferior to oxygen in improving umbilical artery lactate. The results of this trial challenge the efficacy of a ubiquitous obstetric practice and suggest that room air may be an acceptable alternative.

IMPORTANCE Obesity increases the risk of both cesarean delivery and surgical-site infection. Despite widespread use, it is unclear whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery in obese women.OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, initiated immediately after cesarean delivery, lowers the risk of surgical-site infections compared with standard wound dressing in obese women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSMulticenter randomized trial conducted from February 8, 2017, through November 13, 2019, at 4 academic and 2 community hospitals across the United States. Obese women undergoing planned or unplanned cesarean delivery were eligible. The study was terminated after 1624 of 2850 participants were recruited when a planned interim analysis showed increased adverse events in the negative pressure group and futility for the primary outcome. Final follow-up was December 18, 2019.INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to either undergo prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, with application of the negative pressure device immediately after repair of the surgical incision (n = 816), or receive standard wound dressing (n = 808). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was superficial or deep surgical-site infection according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Secondary outcomes included other wound complications, composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications, and adverse skin reactions. RESULTSOf the 1624 women randomized (mean age, 30.4 years, mean body mass index, 39.5), 1608 (99%) completed the study: 806 in the negative pressure group (median duration of negative pressure, 4 days) and 802 in the standard dressing group. Superficial or deep surgical-site infection was diagnosed in 29 participants (3.6%) in the negative pressure group and 27 (3.4%) in the standard dressing group (difference, 0.36%; 95% CI, −1.46% to 2.19%, P = .70). Of 30 prespecified secondary end points, 25 showed no significant differences, including other wound complications (2.6% vs 3.1%; difference, −0.53%; 95% CI, −1.93% to 0.88%; P = .46) and composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications (6.5% vs 6.7%; difference, −0.27%; 95% CI, −2.71% to 2.25%; P = .83). Adverse skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the negative pressure group (7.0% vs 0.6%; difference, 6.95%; 95% CI, 1.86% to 12.03%; P < .001).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, compared with standard wound dressing, did not significantly reduce the risk of surgical-site infection. These findings do not support routine use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women after cesarean delivery.

(Abstracted from JAMA 2020;324:1180–1189) Surgical-site infection is a significant cause of morbidity, lengthening hospital stays and contributing to health care costs. Cesarean delivery increases the risk of surgical site infection, and obesity contributes to this risk because obese pregnant women are more likely to have cesarean deliveries.