Background:For the first time in India, allografts from human extracted teeth were prepared. A randomized, prospective, clinicoradiographical, histological study was conducted to evaluate their efficacy in comparison with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in alveolar ridge preservation.Materials and Methods:Graft preparation: with written consent, teeth were collected from three donors (full mouth extraction cases). Once donors’ serums were tested negative for HIV, HBV, HCV, and Venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), mineralized whole tooth allograft (WTA) and dentin allograft (DA) were prepared using the standard protocol of Tissue Bank at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.Study Design:In this randomized controlled trial, 15 patients undergoing extraction of at least four teeth were selected. In each patient after atraumatic extractions, one socket was grafted with WTA, second with DA, third with FDBA, and fourth was left ungrafted (control site). All the sites were covered with chorion membrane. To estimate three-dimensional alveolar crest changes, cone beam computed tomography scans were taken immediately after grafting and 4 months postoperatively. Bone biopsies using 3 mm trephine bur were obtained from four patients at the time of implant placement and evaluated histologically.Results:Clinically uneventful healing was observed at all sites. Compared to other sites, WTA and DA consistently showed superior results demonstrating least reduction in alveolar crest height and width which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Between WTA and DA sites, there was no statistically significant difference. Histological analysis also confirmed more new bone formation at WTA and DA sites.Conclusions:Rather than disposing extracted human teeth as a biomedical waste (common practice), they can be collected from suitable systemically healthy donors. With the help of tissue bank, they can be processed into an allograft, serving as an excellent alternative to conventional allografts.
Tumour excision leaves behind large defects. Allografts provide an excellent alternative to autografts without donor site morbidity and are especially useful in large defects or in children where the quantity of available autograft is limited. In this paper we discuss our experience with indigenously procured and processed lyophilised, irradiated bone allografts. Bone allografts were used in 41 patients. They were used morsellised and used in 32 cases. Of these, 25 cases were available for follow-up. These included 21 patients in whom the allograft was used in contained cavities. Complete incorporation of the graft was seen between 6 and 9 months in all these 21 patients. In 4 patients the allograft was layered onto autograft. In only one of these the allograft incorporated with the host bone. Struts were used in 9 cases (3 cases complete intercalary segmental defect, 3 cases of hemicortical defects, 2 cases of allograft-prosthesis composite around the hip, in 1 case an iliac-crest block was used to stop bleeding from an anterior sacral defect). Of these, 2 full segment struts showed no incorporation. Both these patients were on chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There was no follow-up in sacral defect case. All the other struts incorporated with the host bone within 6-9 months.In 5 cases there was sterile postoperative drainage. All these cases went on to uneventful. Deep infection was observed in 4 patients (10%). In one, the graft was removed, another settled uneventfully with subsequent incorporation of graft, and two have a persisting sinus but good incorporation.To restore part of the strength of the struts it was necessary to hydrate them for 30 min prior to use. Autogenous marrow or autograft was used to provide osteoinductive properties.Conclusion. In selected cases the lyophilised, irradiated bone allografts proved to be very useful in reconstruction of large tumour defects.
A Tissue Bank is a valuable adjunct to tumour management. In bone tumours, the defects produced by ablative surgery can be reconstructed using banked tissue, thereby obviating the donor site morbidity associated with autografts. Allografts are especially useful in large defects or in children where the quantity of available autograft is limited. The use of bone allografts in India has been limited by the availability of good quality, affordable grafts. In this article we share our experience with the use of indigenously produced allografts in limb salvage, as bone graft expanders and as struts. Lyophilised, irradiated bone allografts were morcellised and used in 32 patients. In 21 of these patients the allograft was used in contained cavities. Complete incorporation of the graft was seen between 6-9 months in all the 25 cases available for follow-up. In 4 patients the allograft was layered onto autograft. The allograft incorporated with the host bone in only one of these patients.Struts were used in 9 cases (3 cases complete intercalary segmental defect, 3 cases of hemicortical defects, 2 cases of allograft-prosthesis composite around the hip, 1 case an iliac-crest block was used to stop bleeding from an anterior sacral defect). Of these, no incorporation of the full segment struts was observed in 2 patients who were on chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The sacral defect case was lost to follow-up. All the other struts incorporated with the host bone within 6-9 months. In 5 cases there was sterile postoperative drainage. Overall infection was observed in 4 patients (10%). In one the graft was removed, another settled uneventfully with subsequent incorporation of graft, and two have a persisting sinus but good incorporation. Since radiation and lyophilisation are known to affect the material properties of bone, the grafts were rehydrated in saline for 30 minutes prior to transplantation. Autogenous marrow or autograft was used to provide osteoinductive properties. In selected cases the lyophilised, irradiated bone allografts proved to be clinically useful in the reconstruction of large tumour defects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.