The objective of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of 3 surgical approaches in the treatment of deep recession type defects. Fifty-four (54) gingival recessions > or = 5 mm were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 treatment groups by blocking the prognostic variables. The first group was treated with a guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure using a bioabsorbable membrane, the second with non-resorbable membrane, and the third with a mucogingival surgical approach consisting of a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally advanced flap (bilaminar technique). No differences, in terms of baseline oral hygiene and defect characteristics, were observed among the 3 groups showing an effective blocking approach. The 1-year results indicated that 1) all treatment approaches resulted in clinically significant root coverage and attachment gain; 2) a statistically significant treatment effect (P = 0.012, ANOVA) was observed comparing the bioabsorbable (4.9+/-0.3 mm), the non-resorbable (4.5+/-0.8 mm), and the bilaminar (5.3+/-0.7 mm) groups, in terms of root coverage; 3) the difference in terms of root coverage between the bilaminar and the non-resorbable membrane groups was statistically significant while differences between the 2 GTR groups or between the bilaminar and the bioabsorbable membrane groups did not reach statistical value; 4) the 95% confidence intervals for the proportions of complete successes showed a similar pattern; 5) no statistical difference was demonstrated in the amount of attachment gain among the 3 groups (P=0.73, ANOVA). A regression model showed that the amount of root coverage was significantly affected by the initial recession depth, the procedure and smoking habits: a poorer root coverage result is expected in case of shallow recession type defects, when either bioabsorbable (P < 0.05) or non-resorbable (P < 0.001) membranes are used instead of a bilaminar technique and if the patient smokes (P < 0.01). It was concluded that the mucogingival bilaminar technique is at least as effective as GTR procedures in the treatment of gingival recession > or = 4 mm and thus recession depth is not the parameter which influences the selection of the surgical procedure.

A surgical technique involving membranes was used to treat localized human buccal recessions 3 mm to 8 mm. The results on 25 patients (test group) were evaluated 18 months postoperatively and compared with the results obtained in 25 other patients (control group) having undergone mucogingival surgery. In the test group, a trapezoidal flap with a large base was raised beyond the mucogingival junction. The exposed root surface was scaled thoroughly to a concave shape. A membrane was bent and adapted onto the concave root surface. The flap was sutured far coronally and the membrane removed one month later. The control patients underwent a 2-step procedure, consisting of a free gingival graft and a coronally positioned flap. The amount of root coverage obtained was similar in the 2 groups (test = 72.73%; control = 70.87%), although the clinical attachment gain (test = 5.12 mm; control = 3.56 mm) and pocket variation (test = 1 mm reduction; control = 0.06 mm increase) differed significantly (P < 0.001). The keratinized tissue width was greater in the control group. The regression analysis showed that the amount of covered root surface after treatment was in strict correlation with the depth of the original recession in the test group, while no correlation was found in the control group. The expected root coverage was greater in the test group when the recession was greater than 4.98 mm, while it was greater in the control group when the recession was less than 4.98 mm. These results indicate that a guided tissue regeneration procedure can be used to successfully treat recession. The membrane procedure compared favorably with the mucogingival surgery in the treatment of deep recession.

The location of the gingival margin relative to the cemento-enamel junction following CAF procedure seems to affect CRC.

Few studies reported individual patient data; they are a valuable contribution to clinical decision making, but IPD published in the literature are still insufficient to provide a reliable guide for clinical decision making. Therefore, decisive steps should be taken to facilitate the publication of IPD, in electronic format, whenever a clinical study is published in a leading journal.

A guided tissue regeneration procedure was used to treat human buccal recessions, 3 to 7 mm deep, in 12 patients. No procedure for increasing the width of keratinized tissue was performed prior to treatment. A thick bipedicled flap was raised with a semilunar incision in the alveolar mucosa and a marginal incision was extended to the adjacent papilla. The root surface was made concave by curets and burs to create space for regeneration. The membrane was fixed to the cemento-enamel junction and covered by the flap which consisted of the residual gingiva and of alveolar mucosa. The membranes were removed 4 weeks after placement. The patients were recalled 6 months after the reentry procedure. The average reduction in recession was 2.50 mm (P less than 0.01) and the average attachment gain was 2.84 (P less than 0.01). Pocket depth was slightly reduced (0.33 mm), although the degree of reduction was not of statistical significance. The width of keratinized tissue increased slightly (0.83 mm). These results demonstrate the possibility of treating human buccal recessions by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedure, with predictable recession reduction and attachment gain. A minimal amount of keratinized tissue was needed.