a b s t r a c tThe unique properties of nanomaterials (NMs) are beneficial in numerous industrial and medical applications. However, they could also induce unintended effects. Thus, a proper strategy for toxicity testing is essential in human hazard and risk assessment. Toxicity can be tested in vivo and in vitro; in compliance with the 3Rs, alternative strategies for in vitro testing should be further developed for NMs. Robust, standardized methods are of great importance in nanotoxicology, with comprehensive material characterization and uptake as an integral part of the testing strategy. Oxidative stress has been shown to be an underlying mechanism of possible toxicity of NMs, causing both immunotoxicity and genotoxicity. For testing NMs in vitro, a battery of tests should be performed on cells of human origin, either cell lines or primary cells, in conditions as close as possible to an in vivo situation. Novel toxicity pathways, particularly epigenetic modification, should be assessed along with conventional toxicity testing methods. However, to initiate epigenetic toxicity screens for NM exposure, there is a need to better understand their adverse effects on the epigenome, to identify robust and reproducible causal links between exposure, epigenetic changes and adverse phenotypic endpoints, and to develop improved assays to monitor epigenetic toxicity.

No abstract

Breast carcinoma is the most common cancer with high mortality caused by metastatic disease. New molecular biomarkers predicting the tumour's metastatic potential would therefore improve metastasis prevention and personalised care. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between DNA methylation levels in invasivity and metastasising associated genes with aberrant protein expression and also to evaluate whether a similar DNA methylation level is present in the tumour and circulating cell-free DNA for utilising plasma DNA methylation as prognostic biomarker. By using pyrosequencing, we analysed DNA methylation levels of 11 genes, namely APC, ADAM23, CXCL12, ESR1, PGR B, CDH1, RASSF1A, SYK, TIMP3, BRMS1 and SOCS1 in tumour, plasma and peripheral blood cells from 34 patients with primary breast cancer, as well as plasma and peripheral blood cells from 50 healthy controls. Simultaneously, the expression of related proteins in paraffin-embedded tumour samples was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS statistics 15.0 software. Tumour DNA hypermethylation was found in most commonly methylated RASSF1A (71.9%), APC (55.9%), ADAM23 (38%) and CXCL12 (34.4%) genes with methylation levels up to 86, 86, 53 and 64 %, respectively. In tumours, significantly higher methylation levels were found in nine genes, compared with the patients´ peripheral blood cell DNA. Furthermore, in patients methylation levels in peripheral blood cell DNA were significantly higher than in controls in CXCL12, ESR1 and TIMP3 genes, but the values did not exceed 15%. On the other hand, no correlations were observed in patients between DNA methylation in tumours and cell-free plasma DNA. Moreover, in patients and controls nearly identical values of cumulative DNA methylation (43.6 % ± 20.1 vs. 43.7 % ± 15.0) were observed in plasma samples. A variable spectrum from high to none expressions presented in tumour tissues in all of the proteins evaluated, however in APC and CXCL12 genes a visible decreasing trend of mean DNA methylation level with increasing expression of the corresponding protein was observed. The DNA methylation profiles manifested in our group of breast carcinomas are cancer specific, but they are not the only cause that affects the silencing of evaluated genes and the decrease of relevant protein products. The clinical utility of DNA methylation testing in peripheral blood cell DNA for cancer diagnosis and therapy need to be further investigated.