Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated protein degradation (ERAD) eliminates misfolded or unassembled proteins from the ER. ERAD targets are selected by a quality control system within the ER lumen and are ultimately destroyed by the cytoplasmic ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). The spatial separation between substrate selection and degradation in ERAD requires substrate transport from the ER to the cytoplasm by a process termed dislocation. In this review, we will summarize advances in various aspects of ERAD and discuss new findings on how substrate dislocation is achieved.
In HIV infected cells, the plasma membrane protein CD4 is removed from the secretory pathway by proteasomal digestion. This crucial step of viral infection occurs at the endoplasmic reticulum and is triggered by the HIV encoded protein Vpu. Here we show that this process can be recapitulated in baker's yeast. The analysis in the yeast system revealed that Vpu-induced breakdown of CD4 occurs independently of the cellular ER-associated protein degradation system. Moreover, our system allows direct comparison between Vpu-mediated turnover and cellular ER-associated protein degradation of CD4. This analysis suggests fundamental mechanistic differences between both pathways: Vpu-induced turnover strictly relies on ubiquitination of CD4 at cytosolic lysine residues prior to export of the substrate from the membrane. In contrast, the cellular ER-associated protein degradation pathway can transport ER-lumenal parts of CD4 into the cytoplasm before ubiquitination and extraction of the membrane anchor.
Proteins that fail to fold properly as well as constitutive or regulated short-lived proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum are subjected to proteolysis by cytosolic 26S proteasomes. This process is known as endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation. In order to become accessible to the proteasome of this system substrates must first be retrogradely transported from the endoplasmic reticulum into the cytosol, in a process termed dislocation. This export step seems to be accompanied by polyubiquitination of such molecules. Surprisingly, protein dislocation from the endoplasmic reticulum seems to require at least some components that mediate import into this compartment. However, protein import and export display differences in the mechanism that provides the driving force and ensures directionality. Of special interest is the cytoplasmic Cdc48p/Npl4p/Ufd1p complex, which is required for the degradation of various endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation substrates and seems to function in a step after polyubiquitination but before proteasomal digestion. In this review, we will summarize our knowledge on protein export during endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation and discuss the possible function of certain components involved in this process.
Yeast SUMO (Smt3) and its mammalian ortholog SUMO-1 are ubiquitin-like proteins that can reversibly be conjugated to other proteins. Among the substrates for SUMO modification in vertebrates are RanGAP1 and RanBP2/Nup358, two proteins previously implicated in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Sumoylated RanGAP1 binds to the nuclear pore complex via RanBP2/Nup358, a giant nucleoporin, which was recently reported to act as a SUMO E3 ligase on some nuclear substrates. However, no direct evidence for a role of the SUMO system in nuclear transport has been obtained so far. By the use of conditional yeast mutants, we examined nuclear protein import in vivo. We show here that cNLS-dependent protein import is impaired in mutants with defective Ulp1 and Uba2, two enzymes involved in the SUMO conjugation reaction. In contrast, other transport pathways such as rgNLS-mediated protein import and mRNA export are not affected. Furthermore, we find that the yeast importin-␣ subunit Srp1 accumulates in the nucleus of ulp1 and uba2 strains but not the importin- subunit Kap95, indicating that a lack of Srp1 export might impair cNLS import. In summary, our results provide evidence that SUMO modification in yeast, as has been suspected for vertebrates, plays an important role in nucleocytoplasmic trafficking.
The HIV-1 protein Gag assembles at the plasma membrane and drives virion budding, assisted by the cellular endosomal-complex-required-for-transport (ESCRT) proteins. Two ESCRT proteins, TSG101 and ALIX, bind to the Gag C-terminal p6 peptide. TSG101 binding is important for efficient HIV-1 release, but how ESCRTs contribute to the budding process and how their activity is coordinated with Gag assembly is poorly understood. Yeast, allowing genetic manipulation that is not easily available in human cells, has been used to characterize the cellular ESCRT function. Previous work reported Gag budding from yeast spheroplasts, but Gag release was ESCRT independent. We developed a yeast model for ESCRT-dependent Gag release. We combined yeast genetics and Gag mutational analysis with Gag-ESCRT binding studies and the characterization of Gag-plasma-membrane binding and Gag release. With our system, we identified a previously unknown interaction between ESCRT proteins and the Gag N-terminal protein region. Mutations in the Gag plasma-membrane-binding matrix domain that reduced Gag-ESCRT binding increased Gag-plasma-membrane binding and Gag release. ESCRT knockout mutants showed that the release enhancement was an ESCRT-dependent effect. Similarly, matrix mutation enhanced Gag release from human HEK293 cells. Release enhancement partly depended on ALIX binding to p6, although binding-site mutation did not impair WT Gag release. Accordingly, the relative affinity for matrix compared to p6 in GST-pull-down experiments was higher for ALIX than for TSG101. We suggest that a transient matrix-ESCRT interaction is replaced when Gag binds to the plasma membrane. This step may activate ESCRT proteins and thereby coordinate ESCRT function with virion assembly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.