Tillage and rotation are fundamental factors influencing soil quality and thus the sustainability of cropping systems. Many studies have focused on the effects of either tillage or rotation, but few have quantified the long term integrated effects of both. We studied the issue using a 30-year old long-term rotation and tillage treatment experiment on a Canadian silt loam soil. Topsoil measurements were carried out for three different rotations: R1 (C-C-C-C) continuous corn (Zea mays L.), R6. (C-C-O(RC), B(RC)) corn, corn, oats (Avena fatua L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and R8, (C-C-S-S) corn, corn, soybean (Glycine max L.), soybean. A red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) cover crop was under seeded in oats and spring barley in R6. In 2010, first year corn was grown in R6 and R8. The tillage treatments included no tillage, NT and mouldboard ploughing, MP. Topsoil structural quality was visually evaluated in early June and mid October.Minimal disturbed soil cores collected in early June were used for X-ray CT scanning and to quantify water content and porosity. Soil friability was determined on the soil samples using a drop shatter test. Crop yield was determined and correlated to the soil quality estimates. We found significant effect of both rotation and tillage on visual soil structure at both times of assessment.Poor soil structure was found for NT except when combined with a diverse crop rotation (R6). The soil core pore characteristics data also displayed a significant effect of tillage but only a weak insignificant effect of rotation. The drop shatter results were in accordance with the visual assessment data. Crop yield correlated significantly with the visual soil structure scores. We conclude that a diverse crop rotation was needed for an optimal performance of NT for the studied soil.
Relationships between soil fractions (their mass or carbon (C)) and soil organic carbon (SOC) have been used to develop central ideas in SOC research. However, few attempts have been made to quantify the relationship between SOC and all soil fractions, despite the potential of such an effort to address SOC stabilization processes. We identified 41 published studies that used diverse management techniques to cause a change in SOC concentration and disrupted soil into macroaggregates (> 250 µm), free microaggregates (53-250 µm) and free silt + clay (< 53 µm), subsequently disrupting macroaggregates into constituent fractions (coarse particulate organic matter [cPOM] > 250 µm, occluded microaggregates, and occluded silt + clay). We used linear hierarchical models to quantify relationships between mass, C concentration and total C of fractions and SOC. Soil mass redistribution toward macroaggregates was associated with SOC accumulation, however total microaggregate mass (free + occluded) did not increase with macroaggregate mass, as would be expected given de novo microaggregate formation within macroaggregates. Instead, high SOC soils exhibited a greater percent of total microaggregates occluded in macroaggregates. Occlusion in macroaggregates was also associated with increased C concentrations of microaggregates (35% higher, SE = 3.2) and silt + clay (30% higher, SE = 3.9) relative to their free counterparts. Taken together, these relationships suggest reduced macroaggregate turnover promotes SOC accumulation via the stabilization of C into occluded fractions. Rates of SOC increase with silt + clay C concentrations failed to increase with mean site-level SOC concentration, indicating of the studied soils (median SOC concentration = 14 g kg -1 ; max 68), SOC accumulation appears unlikely to be limited by C storage capacity in the silt + clay fraction. For each unit SOC gain, macroaggregates accounted for 83% (95% CI = 74, 91),
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.