These findings provide good evidence for the existence of neuropsychological impairment in patients with euthymic bipolar disorder, although the possible effect of medication should not be overlooked. This may be of clinical relevance and raises questions about the course and outcome of the illness.

This study suggests that cognitive vulnerability in patients with bipolar disorder is similar to that described in unipolar disorders. It is not clear whether this dysfunction is a cause or an effect of repeated episodes of bipolar disorder. However, the findings may have implications for clinical treatment as well as suggesting a number of important new avenues of research into psychological models of affective disorder.

Fatigue is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is an important cause of disability. However, the cause of fatigue is poorly understood. This study aimed to describe the frequency and pattern of sleep disturbance in a group of outpatients with MS, and to investigate the relationship between sleep disturbance and fatigue. Sixty outpatients with MS completed the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and kept a sleep diary for seven days. Fatigue and excessive daytime sleepiness were common in this group of patients (64 and 32%). Sleep problems on at least two nights per week occurred frequently, including initial insomnia in 42%, middle insomnia in 53% and terminal insomnia in 58%. The reasons cited for different types of insomnia varied, with anxiety and pain/discomfort being the commonest causes of initial insomnia and nocturia the commonest cause of middle insomnia. Middle insomnia was significantly correlated with daytime fatigue, a relationship that remained after controlling for disability. Sleep disturbance is common in MS and is associated with treatable symptoms, including pain and nocturia. Sleep disturbance may be an important factor contributing to fatigue in patients with MS.

Background Dissociative seizures are paroxysmal events resembling epilepsy or syncope with characteristic features that allow them to be distinguished from other medical conditions. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) plus standardised medical care with standardised medical care alone for the reduction of dissociative seizure frequency. MethodsIn this pragmatic, parallel-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial, we initially recruited participants at 27 neurology or epilepsy services in England, Scotland, and Wales. Adults (≥18 years) who had dissociative seizures in the previous 8 weeks and no epileptic seizures in the previous 12 months were subsequently randomly assigned (1:1) from 17 liaison or neuropsychiatry services following psychiatric assessment, to receive standardised medical care or CBT plus standardised medical care, using a web-based system. Randomisation was stratified by neuropsychiatry or liaison psychiatry recruitment site. The trial manager, chief investigator, all treating clinicians, and patients were aware of treatment allocation, but outcome data collectors and trial statisticians were unaware of treatment allocation. Patients were followed up 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome was monthly dissociative seizure frequency (ie, frequency in the previous 4 weeks) assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes assessed at 12 months were: seizure severity (intensity) and bothersomeness; longest period of seizure freedom in the previous 6 months; complete seizure freedom in the previous 3 months; a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline; changes in dissociative seizures (rated by others); health-related quality of life; psychosocial functioning; psychiatric symptoms, psychological distress, and somatic symptom burden; and clinical impression of improvement and satisfaction. p values and statistical significance for outcomes were reported without correction for multiple comparisons as per our protocol. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population with multiple imputation for missing observations. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN05681227, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325544.