The purpose of this study was to evaluate family physicians’ job strain during the Covid-19 pandemic and determine the effective factors. The study was carried out between 01 May 2020 and 01 June 2020 by applying an online questionnaire to family physicians who worked in primary care in Istanbul and could be reached by telephone application. The survey created by us included socio-demographic information and the Job Strain Scale Short Form. P value was accepted as 0.05, and SPSS 20 package program was used in statistical analysis. 448 Family Physicians participated in the study. Anxiety levels of the participants increased after the pandemic ( p < 0.001). Job strain score increased significantly during the pandemic process ( p < 0.001). The ‘Workload’ sub-dimension of the job strain score was affected by young age, not having children, thinking that the working hours increased, deterioration of sleep quality and increasing anxiety level. It was determined that there was an increase in the “Control” sub-dimension score of family physicians who thought that they were not provided with adequate protective equipment during the pandemic process and who did not find the use of their own personal protective equipment sufficient. ‘Social support’ sub-dimension mean score decreased during the pandemic period. It was determined that it significantly increased in married family physicians compared to single ones. In the pandemic process, anxiety, sleep quality deterioration and job strain increased significantly. In family physicians, after the pandemic, workload and control sub-dimension changes increased, while social support sub-dimension decreased.
Objective: To determine the levels of COVID-19-related fear and to investigate fear-associated factors among older people. Methods: This study was conducted with patients aged 65 years and older from the Family Medicine Clinic of Health Sciences University Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Hospital over a 1-month period. A telephone survey was administered to evaluate patients’ sociodemographic data and knowledge level on the COVID-19 pandemic and the degree of its impact. The fear levels of participants were determined using the fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19 S). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The study included 315 participants: 178 were female and 137 were male. The mean age was 71.5 ± 5.6 (min: 65, max: 94) years, and 26 participants were living alone. Moreover, 47.6% participants considered they had sufficient information about the COVID-19 outbreak, and 61.6% received information about the pandemic from television and 22.2% from their inner circle. While 11.7% participants considered they would require psychological support after the COVID-19 pandemic, 30.8% had sleep disorders for the last month. The mean FCV-19 S score was 16.0 ± 6.4; the FCV-19 S scores were statistically higher in participants who were women, living alone, had partial information about the COVID-19 pandemic, had sleep disorders for the last month, and were in requirement of psychological support after the pandemic. Conclusion: It is necessary to screen the older people for the COVID-19-related fear and accompanying psychological disorders and to develop appropriate intervention programs for individuals at risk.
The safety of vaccines, access to health care, the level of community's knowledge and the attention of physicians play a critical role in the rate of adult vaccination. This study aims to determine the immunization rate of pneumococcal, influenza and tetanus vaccines among the patients and their knowledge and attitudes in the hospital. The study is a cross-sectional point prevalence survey. The patients who agreed to participate in the study were interviewed using a questionnaire. Patients' gender, occupation, educational status, income level and risk factors (immunosuppressed and over 65 years old) were compared with the knowledge and attitudes about vaccinations. Of the 251 participants, 51.4% were female and 48.6% were male. The self-reported vaccination rate was 3.5% for pneumococcal, 8.6% for influenza and 26.6% for tetanus. Most of the patients have knowledge about influenza vaccination (90.3%). Patients with the high education level have significantly higher knowlege about tetanus vaccination and higher rate of tetanus vaccine compared to those with low education level (p = 0.04; p = 0.006). It was found that those with higher income levels had the more pneumococcal vaccination, more knowledge on tetanus vaccination, and more attitude that tetanus vaccine is necessary compared to those with lower income level (p < 0.05). Patients without risk factors have a higher rate of tetanus vaccination compared to those with risk factors (p < 0.001). It was inferred that the high level of education and income have a positive effect on the patients vaccination rates and their knowledge and attitude.
Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of individuals aged 20-64 about Coronavirus disease-2019 . Materials and Methods:In this study, an online questionnaire was applied to individuals between the ages of 20-64 registered at the Training Family Health Centre of the Okmeydanı Health Practices and Research Centre between 4-8 May 2020 through a phone application. The number of individuals between the ages of 20-64 years in these centres was 12.500, and the survey was sent to every person who owned a phone. One thousand one hundred thirty-eight surveys were included in the study. The confidence interval of our study was 1.96. The online questionnaire form consists of two parts: The first part includes the information form that assesses the socio-demographic data and the practice of personal protection and precautions, and the second part includes questions about knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19.Results: One thousand one hundred thirty-eight individuals participated in this study. The average age of the participants was 37.79 [standard deviation (SD): 9.68, minimum: 20, maximum: 64]. The average COVID-19 knowledge score was 10.26 (SD: 1.44, range 0-12). This value shows that in general, the participants correctly answered a proportion of 85.5% (10.26/12*100). Based on the multiple linear regression analysis, the female gender (compared to men β:-0.268, p=0.030), individuals with high school or higher education (compared to lower than high school, β: 0.479, p=0.008) and white-collar workers (compared to retired/not working β: -0.141, p=0.010), and those with an income of 4500 TL and higher (compared to 2.300 and lower β: 0.143, p=0.039) had statistically significantly high knowledge scores Conclusion: Generally, the participants had a high level of knowledge of COVID-19. In particular, women, those with high educational levels, members of a white-collar profession group and those with high-income levels were more knowledgeable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.