ObjectivesThe rarity of temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) precludes a clear understanding of the disease and approach to its management. This review provides general background on the disease and discusses the current and emerging oncologic and rehabilitative management options.Data SourcesPubMed literature review.MethodsA review of the current literature was conducted to assess and collate up‐to‐date information regarding TBSCC management.ResultsTBSCC is a rare and aggressive disease arising in the ear canal, temporal bone, or extratemporal sites. Prior radiation, chronic ear disease, or habitual ear picking may contribute to primary disease development. Because the symptoms of TBSCC and benign otologic disease are similar, TBSCC diagnosis may be delayed, allowing the tumor time to spread throughout the anatomically intricate temporal bone. The extent of the disease is determined based on imaging and is usually staged with the Pittsburgh Staging System. Temporal bone resection with parotidectomy and neck dissection is the current standard of care. Survival is generally good for early disease and poor for advanced disease, but chemotherapy is emerging as a promising treatment option. Auditory rehabilitation with osseointegrated hearing aids is recommended at initial oncologic resection.ConclusionsThe knowledge of and outcomes for TBSCC have improved with time, but because of the aggressive nature of the disease and the anatomic intricacy of the temporal bone, TBSCC treatment is complex and should be delivered by a multidisciplinary team. Inter‐institutional collaboration may accelerate research for this rare disease.Level of Evidence5.
Objective: We present two patients with recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) after platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) with complete response via abscopal effect following combined immunotherapy (IT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We review the literature for patients undergoing combined treatment with IT and RT to identify potential cases of abscopal response. Study Design: This is a case series with a contemporary review of the literature. Methods: Retrospective chart review identified two patients with potential abscopal responses after IT and RT for R/M HNSCC. The MEDLINE database was queried using the search terms “abscopal AND head and neck squamous cell carcinoma” and “immunotherapy AND stereotactic body radiation therapy.” Results: Two patients with metastatic HNSCC developed complete responses via a possible abscopal effect following combined SBRT and IT. Interim follow-up of both patients revealed a sustained, complete response. We examine the immunogenic effects of RT and report the first cases of potential abscopal effect for R/M HNSCC. We also review several preclinical studies demonstrating the synergistic efficacy of combined RT and IT with a discussion of possible mechanism. Conclusion: Observation of abscopal effect with combined IT and RT is currently under investigation through several preclinical studies and trials. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first two reported cases of abscopal effect for patients with HNSCC. We report two patients with R/M HNSCC with sustained, complete response after systemic IT and local RT.
Objectives The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative vascular embolization (PVE) on juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) surgical outcomes using a national pediatric hospitalization database. Methods The health care cost and utilization project Kids' Inpatient Database was queried for all cases of operative management of JNA between the years of 1997 and 2016. Cases were stratified based on whether the patient received PVE. A multiple linear regression was used to predict the effect of PVE on hospital length of stay (LOS) and total cost while controlling for patient demographic factors and comorbidities. The odds ratio (OR) of receiving a perioperative blood transfusion was computed using a binary logistic regression for PVE patients. Results A total of 473 patients who underwent JNA surgical resection in this time period were identified. The use of PVE has increased from 0% in 1997 to 66% of all cases by 2016. PVE was found to decrease LOS by 1 day (p = 0.036) and decrease the odds of needing a perioperative blood transfusion (OR = 0.511, p = 0.041). Patients receiving PVE were charged an additional $35,600 (p < 0.001), but recent data in 2016 indicate that hospital costs for PVE are decreasing. Conclusion PVE of JNA is becoming increasingly prevalent. Embolization results in decreased hospital LOS and lower odds of needing blood transfusions. While embolization increases the cost of management, this trend should be re-evaluated as this procedure is becoming more widespread.
OBJECTIVE Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are the most common neoplasm of the cerebellopontine angle in adults. Though these lesions are generally slow growing, their growth patterns and associated symptoms can be unpredictable, which may complicate the decision to pursue conservative management versus active intervention. Additionally, surgical decision-making can be controversial because of limited high-quality evidence and multiple quality-of-life considerations. Machine learning (ML) is a powerful tool that utilizes data sets to essentialize multidimensional clinical processes. In this study, the authors trained multiple tree-based ML algorithms to predict the decision for active treatment versus MRI surveillance of VS in a single institutional cohort. In doing so, they sought to assess which preoperative variables carried the most weight in driving the decision for intervention and could be used to guide future surgical decision-making through an evidence-based approach. METHODS The authors reviewed the records of patients who had undergone evaluation by neurosurgery and otolaryngology with subsequent active treatment (resection or radiation) for unilateral VS in the period from 2009 to 2021, as well as those of patients who had been evaluated for VS and were managed conservatively throughout 2021. Clinical presentation, radiographic data, and management plans were abstracted from each patient record from the time of first evaluation until the last follow-up or surgery. Each encounter with the patient was treated as an instance involving a management decision that depended on demographics, symptoms, and tumor profile. Decision tree and random forest classifiers were trained and tested to predict the decision for treatment versus imaging surveillance on the basis of unseen data using an 80/20 pseudorandom split. Predictor variables were tuned to maximize performance based on lowest Gini impurity indices. Model performance was optimized using fivefold cross-validation. RESULTS One hundred twenty-four patients with 198 rendered decisions concerning management were included in the study. In the decision tree analysis, only a maximum tumor dimension threshold of 1.6 cm and progressive symptoms were required to predict the decision for treatment with 85% accuracy. Optimizing maximum dimension thresholds and including age at presentation boosted accuracy to 88%. Random forest analysis (n = 500 trees) predicted the decision for treatment with 80% accuracy. Factors with the highest variable importance based on multiple measures of importance, including mean minimal conditional depth and largest Gini impurity reduction, were maximum tumor dimension, age at presentation, Koos grade, and progressive symptoms at presentation. CONCLUSIONS Tree-based ML was used to predict which factors drive the decision for active treatment of VS with 80%–88% accuracy. The most important factors were maximum tumor dimension, age at presentation, Koos grade, and progressive symptoms. These results can assist in surgical decision-making and patient counseling. They also demonstrate the power of ML algorithms in extracting useful insights from limited data sets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.