This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Background Trichomonas vaginalis is the most prevalent non-viral sexually transmitted infection. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of secnidazole vs. placebo in women with trichomoniasis. Methods Women with trichomoniasis, confirmed by a positive T. vaginalis culture, were randomized to single-dose oral secnidazole 2g or placebo. The primary endpoint was microbiological test of cure (TOC) by culture 6–12 days after dosing. At the TOC visit, participants were given the opposite treatment. They were followed for resolution of infection afterward and offered treatment at subsequent visits, if needed. Fifty patients per group (N=100) provided ~95% power to detect a statistically significant difference between treatment groups. Results Between April 2019 and March 2020, 147 women enrolled at 10 US sites. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included 131 randomized patients (64/67, in secnidazole/placebo). Cure rates were significantly higher in the secnidazole vs. placebo group (92.2% [95% CI: 82.7–97.4] vs. 1.5% [95% CI: 0.0–8.0]) for the mITT population and for the per-protocol population (94.9% [95% CI: 85.9–98.9]) vs. 1.7% [95% CI: 0.0–8.9]). Cure rates were 100% (4/4) in women with HIV and 95.2% (20/21) in women with bacterial vaginosis (BV). Secnidazole was generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were vulvovaginal candidiasis and nausea (each 2.7%). No serious TEAEs were observed. Conclusion A single oral 2g dose of secnidazole was associated with significantly higher microbiological cure rates vs. placebo, supporting a role for secnidazole in treating women with trichomoniasis, including those with HIV and/or BV.
Highlights Recurrent bacterial vaginosis impacts on women and carries a high financial burden. Astodrimer 1% Gel was superior to placebo for prevention of recurrent BV. Astodrimer 1% Gel was well tolerated when used every second day for 16 weeks. Results support the use of Astodrimer 1% Gel for prevention of recurrent BV.
Background: Bacterial vaginosis is highly recurrent after antibiotic treatment, and prevention represents an unmet medical need. Astodrimer 1% Gel contains a novel dendrimer that blocks bacterial attachment and has been shown to effectively treat bacterial vaginosis. Objective: The objective of the study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of Astodrimer 1% Gel to prevent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. Study Design: 864 women with a current episode of bacterial vaginosis and a history of recurrent bacterial vaginosis were enrolled in the open-label phase of the study to receive oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) at 77 centers in North America. 586 women successfully treated with metronidazole were randomly assigned 1:1 to Astodrimer 1% Gel or placebo at a dose of 5 g vaginally every second day for 16 weeks, and followed for a further 12 weeks off-treatment. The primary endpoint was recurrence of bacterial vaginosis (presence of ≥3 Amsel criteria) at or by Week 16. Secondary endpoints of recurrence of bacterial vaginosis at or by Week 16 included time to recurrence, subject-reported symptoms of bacterial vaginosis, individual Amsel criteria, Nugent score 7-10, and the composite of Amsel criteria and Nugent score. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Results: Astodrimer 1% Gel was superior to placebo for the primary and many secondary efficacy measures. At or by Week 16, bacterial vaginosis recurred in 44.2% (130/294) of women receiving astodrimer and 54.3% (158/291) receiving placebo (P = .015). Time to recurrence of bacterial vaginosis was significantly longer for women receiving astodrimer compared with placebo (Kaplan-Meier survival curves, P = .007). Recurrence of subject-reported symptoms at or by Week 16 was also significantly lower in the astodrimer arm compared with placebo (vaginal odor and/or discharge, 27.9% [75/269] vs 40.6% [108/266], P = .002). A significantly lower proportion of patients receiving astodrimer compared with placebo had recurrence of bacterial vaginosis at or by Week 16 by other secondary measures, including individual Amsel criteria (vaginal discharge and clue cells), Nugent score 7-10, and composite of Nugent score and Amsel criteria. Recurrence of subject-reported bacterial vaginosis symptoms, vaginal odor and/or discharge, was significantly lower in the astodrimer arm compared with placebo up to 8 weeks after cessation of therapy (36.1% [97/269] vs 45.5% [121/266], P = .027). During the 12-week follow-up, recurrence of ≥3 Amsel criteria after cessation of therapy in women given astodrimer was lower than in those given placebo, but the differences were not statistically significant. Adverse events were infrequent, and rates were similar between placebo and astodrimer groups, except for vulvovaginal candidiasis and urinary tract infection, which occurred more often in women receiving astodrimer. Conclusions: Astodrimer 1% Gel, administered every second day for 16 weeks, was effective and superior to placebo for prevention of recurrent bacterial vaginosis in women with a history of recurrent BV, and was well-tolerated. These results support a role for Astodrimer 1% Gel as an effective long-term treatment to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis that avoids potential issues associated with conventional antibiotics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.