Deep learning for protein interactions The use of deep learning has revolutionized the field of protein modeling. Humphreys et al . combined this approach with proteome-wide, coevolution-guided protein interaction identification to conduct a large-scale screen of protein-protein interactions in yeast (see the Perspective by Pereira and Schwede). The authors generated predicted interactions and accurate structures for complexes spanning key biological processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . The complexes include larger protein assemblies such as trimers, tetramers, and pentamers and provide insights into biological function. —VV

The error-free DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathway is crucial for replication completion and genome integrity. Mechanistically, this process is driven by a switch of templates accompanied by sister chromatid junction (SCJ) formation. Here, we asked if DDT intermediate processing is temporarily regulated, and what impact such regulation may have on genome stability. We find that persistent DDT recombination intermediates are largely resolved before anaphase through a G2/M damage checkpoint-independent, but Cdk1/Cdc5-dependent pathway that proceeds via a previously described Mus81-Mms4-activating phosphorylation. The Sgs1-Top3- and Mus81-Mms4-dependent resolution pathways occupy different temporal windows in relation to replication, with the Mus81-Mms4 pathway being restricted to late G2/M. Premature activation of the Cdk1/Cdc5/Mus81 pathway, achieved here with phosphomimetic Mms4 variants as well as in S-phase checkpoint-deficient genetic backgrounds, induces crossover-associated chromosome translocations and precocious processing of damage-bypass SCJ intermediates. Taken together, our results underscore the importance of uncoupling error-free versus erroneous recombination intermediate processing pathways during replication, and establish a new paradigm for the role of the DNA damage response in regulating genome integrity by controlling crossover timing.

Human SHPRH gene is located at the 6q24 chromosomal region, and loss of heterozygosity in this region is seen in a wide variety of cancers. SHPRH is a member of the SWI͞SNF family of ATPases͞ helicases, and it possesses a C 3HC4 RING motif characteristic of ubiquitin ligase proteins. In both of these features, SHPRH resembles the yeast Rad5 protein, which, together with Mms2-Ubc13, promotes replication through DNA lesions via an error-free postreplicational repair pathway. Genetic evidence in yeast has indicated a role for Rad5 as a ubiquitin ligase in mediating the Mms2-Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Here we show that SHPRH is a functional homolog of Rad5. Similar to Rad5, SHPRH physically interacts with the Rad6 -Rad18 and Mms2-Ubc13 complexes, and we show that SHPRH protein is a ubiquitin ligase indispensable for Mms2-Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Based on these observations, we predict a role for SHPRH in promoting error-free replication through DNA lesions. Such a role for SHPRH is consistent with the observation that this gene is mutated in a number of cancer cell lines, including those from melanomas and ovarian cancers, which raises the strong possibility that SHPRH function is an important deterrent to mutagenesis and carcinogenesis in humans.postreplication repair ͉ translesion synthesis ͉ tumor suppressor

Damage tolerance mechanisms mediating damage-bypass and gap-filling are crucial for genome integrity. A major damage tolerance pathway involves recombination and is referred to as template switch. Template switch intermediates were visualized by 2D gel electrophoresis in the proximity of replication forks as X-shaped structures involving sister chromatid junctions. The homologous recombination factor Rad51 is required for the formation/stabilization of these intermediates, but its mode of action remains to be investigated. By using a combination of genetic and physical approaches, we show that the homologous recombination factors Rad55 and Rad57, but not Rad59, are required for the formation of template switch intermediates. The replication-proficient but recombination-defective rfa1-t11 mutant is normal in triggering a checkpoint response following DNA damage but is impaired in X-structure formation. The Exo1 nuclease also has stimulatory roles in this process. The checkpoint kinase, Rad53, is required for X-molecule formation and phosphorylates Rad55 robustly in response to DNA damage. Although Rad55 phosphorylation is thought to activate recombinational repair under conditions of genotoxic stress, we find that Rad55 phosphomutants do not affect the efficiency of X-molecule formation. We also examined the DNA polymerase implicated in the DNA synthesis step of template switch. Deficiencies in translesion synthesis polymerases do not affect X-molecule formation, whereas DNA polymerase δ, required also for bulk DNA synthesis, plays an important role. Our data indicate that a subset of homologous recombination factors, together with DNA polymerase δ, promote the formation of template switch intermediates that are then preferentially dissolved by the action of the Sgs1 helicase in association with the Top3 topoisomerase rather than resolved by Holliday Junction nucleases. Our results allow us to propose the choreography through which different players contribute to template switch in response to DNA damage and to distinguish this process from other recombination-mediated processes promoting DNA repair.

A key function of the cellular DNA damage response is to facilitate the bypass of replication fork-stalling DNA lesions. Template switch reactions allow such a bypass and involve the formation of DNA joint molecules (JMs) between sister chromatids. These JMs need to be resolved before cell division; however, the regulation of this process is only poorly understood. Here, we identify a regulatory mechanism in yeast that critically controls JM resolution by the Mus81-Mms4 endonuclease. Central to this regulation is a conserved complex comprising the scaffold proteins Dpb11 and Slx4 that is under stringent control. Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of Slx4 by Cdk1 promotes the Dpb11-Slx4 interaction, while in mitosis, phosphorylation of Mms4 by Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes the additional association of Mus81-Mms4 with the complex, thereby promoting JM resolution. Finally, the DNA damage checkpoint counteracts Mus81-Mms4 binding to the Dpb11-Slx4 complex. Thus, Dpb11-Slx4 integrates several cellular inputs and participates in the temporal program for activation of the JM-resolving nuclease Mus81. Intrinsically and extrinsically induced DNA lesions can compromise the integrity of the genetic information and threaten cell viability. DNA lesions are particularly dangerous during S phase, when faithful DNA replication relies on two intact DNA strands. DNA lesions hamper the progression of replication forks and thereby the complete duplication of chromosomes. Moreover, replication forks that are stalled at DNA lesion sites can collapse and cause chromosome breaks and genome instability (Branzei and Foiani 2010).Eukaryotes possess two fundamentally different mechanisms to bypass DNA lesions that affect one of the parental DNA strands: translesion synthesis (TLS) and template switching. TLS employs specialized polymerases (translesion polymerases) that in many cases are able to replicate the damaged strand but with a reduced fidelity (Prakash et al. 2005). On the other hand, during template switching, the genetic information is copied from the newly synthesized, undamaged sister chromatid. This mechanism is therefore error-free in principle, yet its precise mechanism remains poorly understood. Template switching is a complex process that can be initiated by different recombination-based mechanisms (homologous recombination [HR] and error-free post-replicative repair [PRR]) (Branzei et al. 2008). The choice between the different bypass mechanisms is regulated by ubiquitin and SUMO modifications Ó 2014 Gritenaite et al. This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml).