Tea tree oil kept in open and closed bottles or other containers undergoes photooxidation within a few days to several months, leading to the creation of degradation products that are moderate to strong sensitizers. Peroxides, epoxides and endoperoxides, like ascaridol and 1,2,4-trihydroxy menthane, are formed. These must be considered responsible for the development of allergic contact dermatitis seen in individuals treating themselves with the oil. A test series with 15 characteristic constituents is recommended for patch testing.

Results of aimed patch testing with constituents of sesquiterpene lactone (SL) mix, Compositae mix (CM) and other Compositae extracts and allergens in 190 Compositae-allergic patients detected in an 8-year period are presented. Feverfew of CM elicited positive reactions most frequently, followed by tansy, wild chamomile, yarrow and arnica, whereas dehydrocostus lactone of SL was the most frequent elicitor of positive reactions, followed by alantolactone and costunolide. Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema) and marguerite (Argyranthemum frutescens) were the most important suspected sensitizers in both occupationally and nonoccupationally exposed, and cross-reactions between chrysanthemum and feverfew/tansy/chamomile may partly explain the high prevalence of positive reactions to the 3 last mentioned. In the nonoccupationally sensitized group, garden plants such as feverfew, blanket flower (Gaillardia), elecampane (Inula helenium), large yellow ox-eye (Telekia speciosa) and cosmea (Cosmos) were additional important allergenic plants. The 3 last mentioned were picked up by SL mix. Most of the lettuce-sensitized persons were CM-positive. 19% of the occupationally sensitized group were negative to both SL and CM, making very aimed patch testing necessary, notably when suspecting rare sensitizers such as Gerbera and star of the veldt (Osteospermum). The significance of the weeds dandelion, dog fennel and ox-eye daisy as sensitizers is not clarified, but they are probably less important than cultivated plants.

Routine patch testing with sesquiterpene lactone (SL) mix, supplemented with Compositae mix (CM) and other Compositae extracts and allergens where appropriate, was evaluated over an 8‐year period. 190 of 4386 patients tested (4.3%) were Compositae‐sensitive, 143 females (mean age 51.5 years) and 47 males (mean age 55 years), and 83% of reactions considered clinically relevant. 22% were suspected of occupational sensitization/dermatitis. 62% had a contact allergy to 2 or more compounds, most often to nickel, fragrance and colophonium. SL mix detected 65%, CM 87% of Compositae‐allergic patients, and the overall detection rate with both mixes was 93%. Few irritant reactions and no cases of clear‐cut active sensitization were recorded with the mixes, but our results emphasize the importance of differentiating late‐appearing reactivation reactions from patch test sensitization. The weakly positive CM reactions could reflect some irritancy, but as they were associated with fragrance and/or colophonium allergy to a higher degree than weakly positive SL mix reactions, they probably represented cross‐reactions. In conclusion, the detection rate with SL mix was high enough to support its continued use as a screening mix and it was very well and rather safely supplemented by aimed testing with CM.

26 different compounds have been investigated experimentally for their sensitizing capacity in guinea pigs. 19 of these occur in propolis as well as in poplar bud exudates, and 14 of them are also found in balsam of Peru. 4 caffeates and benzyl isoferulate were found to be strong sensitizers. 7 compounds were moderate, and 13 compounds showed only weak sensitizing potency. Methyl cinnamate was negative. Patch tests in 11 propolis-sensitive patients once more revealed 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate and phenylethyl caffeate as the major sensitizers. In addition to the 8 compounds already known to occur in propolis as well as in balsam of Peru, we detected 5 further substances that both materials have in common. Among these, benzyl isoferulate is considered a noteworthy sensitizer. Coniferyl benzoate, which was shown to be a moderate sensitizer, is present in fresh samples of balsam of Peru, while in propolis it has been detected only once so far. The flavonoid aglycones occurring in poplar bud exudates, and hence also in propolis, are weak sensitizers which play only a minor role in propolis hypersensitivity.

No abstract