While buprenorphine's analgesic effect increased significantly, respiratory depression was similar in magnitude and timing for the two doses tested. We conclude that over the dose range tested buprenorphine displays ceiling in respiratory effect but none in analgesic effect.

Our data confirm a ceiling effect of buprenorphine but not fentanyl with respect to respiratory depression.

Naloxone is a non-selective, short-acting opioid receptor antagonist that has a long clinical history of successful use and is presently considered a safe drug over a wide dose range (up to 10 mg). In opioid-dependent patients, naloxone is used in the treatment of opioid-overdose-induced respiratory depression, in (ultra)rapid detoxification and in combination with buprenorphine for maintenance therapy (to prevent intravenous abuse). Risks related to naloxone use in opioid-dependent patients are: i) the induction of an acute withdrawal syndrome (the occurrence of vomiting and aspiration is potentially life threatening); ii) the effect of naloxone may wear off prematurely when used for treatment of opioid-induced respiratory depression; and iii) in patients treated for severe pain with an opioid, high-dose naloxone and/or rapidly infused naloxone may cause catecholamine release and consequently pulmonary edema and cardiac arrhythmias. These risks warrant the cautious use of naloxone and adequate monitoring of the cardiorespiratory status of the patient after naloxone administration where indicated.

The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of buprenorphine and fentanyl for the respiratory depressant effect in healthy volunteers. Data on the time course of the ventilatory response at a fixed P(ET)CO(2) of 50 mm Hg and P(ET)O(2) of 110 mm Hg following intravenous administration of buprenorphine and fentanyl were obtained from two phase I studies (50 volunteers received buprenorphine: 0.05-0.6 mg/70 kg and 24 volunteers received fentanyl: 0.075-0.5 mg/70 kg). The PK/PD correlations were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. A two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic model characterized the time course of fentanyl and buprenorphine concentration, respectively. Three structurally different PK/PD models were evaluated for their appropriateness to describe the time course of respiratory depression: (1) a biophase distribution model with a fractional sigmoid E(max) pharmacodynamic model, (2) a receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function, and (3) a combined biophase distribution-receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function. The results show that for fentanyl hysteresis is entirely determined by the biophase distribution kinetics, whereas for buprenorphine hysteresis is caused by a combination of biophase distribution kinetics and receptor association/dissociation kinetics. The half-time values of biophase equilibration (t(1/2, k(eo))) were 16.4 and 75.3 min for fentanyl and buprenorphine, respectively. In addition, for buprenorphine, the value of k(on) was 0.246 ml/ng/min and the value of k(off) was 0.0102 min(-1). The concentration-effect relationship of buprenorphine was characterized by a ceiling effect at higher concentrations (intrinsic activity alpha=0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.62), whereas fentanyl displayed full respiratory depressant effect (alpha=0.91, 95% CI: 0.19-1.62).

The objective of this investigation was to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation of buprenorphine and fentanyl for the antinociceptive effect in rats. Data on the time course of the antinociceptive effect following intravenous administration of buprenorphine or fentanyl was analyzed in conjunction with plasma concentrations by nonlinear mixedeffects analysis. For fentanyl, the pharmacokinetics was described on the basis of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. For buprenorphine, a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described the concentration time course. To explain time dependencies in pharmacodynamics of buprenorphine and fentanyl, a combined effect compartment/receptor binding model was applied. A log logistic probability distribution model is proposed to account for censored tail-flick latencies. The model converged, yielding precise estimates of the parameters characterizing hysteresis. The results show that onset and offset of the antinociceptive effect of both buprenorphine and fentanyl is mainly determined by biophase distribution. The k eo was 0.024 min Ϫ1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.018 -0.030 min Ϫ1 ] and 0.123 min Ϫ1 (95% CI: 0.095-0.151 min Ϫ1 ) for buprenorphine and fentanyl, respectively. On the other hand, part of the hysteresis in the buprenorphine pharmacodynamics could be explained by slow receptor association/dissociation kinetics. The k off was 0.073 min Ϫ1 (95% CI: 0.042-0.104 min Ϫ1 ) and k on was 0.023 ml/ng/min (95% CI: 0.013-0.033 ml/ng/min). Fentanyl binds instantaneously to the OP3 receptor because no reasonable values for k on and k off were obtained with the dynamical receptor model. In contrast to earlier reports in the literature, the findings of this study show that the rate-limiting step in the onset and offset of buprenorphine's antinociceptive effect is distribution to the brain.Buprenorphine is a semisynthetic opiate synthesized from the precursor thebaine. Several studies have revealed OP3 (-opioid) receptor agonistic binding capacity for buprenorphine. More specifically, a study conducted in the spinal dog classified buprenorphine as a partial agonist for the OP3 receptor (Martin et al., 1976). The OP3 receptor is of specific interest, given its role in the mediation of analgesia (Zhang and Pasternak, 1981;Lutfy et al., 2003). In principle, partial agonists only produce a submaximal response relative to full agonists which display full efficacy. However, the exact behavior of buprenorphine at the OP3 receptor in relation to its analgesic effect has not yet been unequivocally clarified. Data from animal studies suggest that buprenorphine-mediated analgesia might be governed by a bell-shaped doseresponse curve (Cowan et al., 1977a,b;Dum and Herz, 1981). At the lower dose range, a dose-dependent increase in analgesia is observed, whereas at intermediate doses, the response is diminished. At relatively high doses, evidence for an inverse dose-response relationship has been obtained in animals. However, the observed pharmacologica...