Purpose: Chromosomal instability is a fundamental property of cancer, which can be quantified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) from plasma/serum-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA). We hypothesized that cfDNA could be used as a real-time surrogate for imaging analysis of disease status as a function of response to immunotherapy and as a more reliable tool than tumor biomarkers.Experimental Design: Plasma cfDNA sequences from 56 patients with diverse advanced cancers were prospectively collected and analyzed in a single-blind study for copy number variations, expressed as a quantitative chromosomal number instability (CNI) score versus 126 noncancer controls in a training set of 23 and a blinded validation set of 33. Tumor biomarker concentrations and a surrogate marker for T regulatory cells (Tregs) were comparatively analyzed.Results: Elevated CNI scores were observed in 51 of 56 patients prior to therapy. The blinded validation cohort provided an overall prediction accuracy of 83% (25/30) and a positive predictive value of CNI score for progression of 92% (11/12). The combination of CNI score before cycle (Cy) 2 and 3 yielded a correct prediction for progression in all 13 patients. The CNI score also correctly identified cases of pseudo-tumor progression from hyperprogression. Before Cy2 and Cy3, there was no significant correlation for protein tumor markers, total cfDNA, or surrogate Tregs.Conclusions: Chromosomal instability quantification in plasma cfDNA can serve as an early indicator of response to immunotherapy. The method has the potential to reduce health care costs and disease burden for cancer patients following further validation.

Thrombocytopenia is a common finding in septic shock patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Various mechanisms have been attributed to explain the occurrence of thrombocytopenia, including disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) 1-3 , cytokine-driven haemophagocytosis of platelets 4,5 , immune-mechanisms, such as elevated plateletassociated IgG 1,6 , invasive catheters, especially pulmonary artery catheters 7,8 , and medications, such as heparin and pencillin analogues. Thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients, including trauma patients and surgical patients, has been found to be an independent marker for poor prognosis, increased bleeding, longer ICU stay and increased mortality 7-11. Most studies so far have explored the risk factors and clinical outcomes in critically ill medical, surgical, trauma or cardiac patients with thrombocytopenia. In this study, we looked at thrombocytopenic septic shock patients in a medical ICU. The objectives of the study were to study, 1) incidence of various degrees of severity of thrombocytopenia in septic shock, 2) risk factors for its development and 3) the correlation of thrombocytopenia with organ dysfunction, length of ICU stay and clinical outcome including mortality.

Background:Pembrolizumab (P) is an anti-PD-1 antibody that blocks the interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T-cells and PD-L1 and PD-L2 on tumour cells. A phase Ib trial of P plus chemotherapy was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy.Methods:Patients with advanced, metastatic solid tumours were enrolled onto one of six treatment arms. Pembrolizumab was given: with gemcitabine (G), G+docetaxel (D), G+nab-paclitaxel (NP), G+vinorelbine (V) or irinotecan (I) until progression or toxicity, or with liposomal doxorubicin (LD) for up to 15 cycles, progression or toxicity. Safety monitoring and response assessments were conducted.Results:Forty-nine patients were enrolled and treated. The most common adverse events were transaminitis, cytopenias, rash, diarrhoea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting. Arm 2 was closed due to poor accrual. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined for Arms 1, 3a, 4, 5 and 6. There were eight partial responses across multiple tumour types.Conclusions:Standard dose P can be safely combined with G, G+NP, G+V, I and LD. Efficacy was observed in multiple tumour types and evaluation to determine if response and duration of response are more robust than what would be expected for chemotherapy or immunotherapy alone requires further validation.