Seasonal influenza is a cause of hospitalization, especially in people with underlying disease or extreme age, and its severity may differ depending on the types and subtypes of circulating viruses. We investigated the factors associated with ICU admission or death in hospitalized patients with severe laboratory-confirmed influenza according to the viral type and subtype. An observational epidemiological study was carried out in patients aged ≥18 years from 12 Catalan hospitals between 2010 and 2016. For each reported case we collected demographic, virological and clinical characteristics. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to estimate crude and adjusted ORs. 1726 hospitalized patients were included: 595 (34.5%) were admitted to the ICU and 224 (13.0%) died. Lower ICU admission was associated with age ≥75 years in all influenza types and subtypes and with age 65–74 years for type A. In contrast, the 65–74 and ≥75 years age groups were associated with an increased risk of death in all types and subtypes, especially for type B (aOR 27.42, 95% CI: 4.95–151.93 and 15.96; 95% CI: 3.01–84.68). The comorbidity most closely associated with severe outcomes was immune deficiency, which was associated with death for type B (aOR 9.02, 95% CI: 3.05–26.69) and subtype A(H1N1)pdm09 (aOR 3.16, 95% CI: 1.77–5.66). Older age was a differential factor for ICU admission and death: it was associated with lower ICU admission but a risk factor for death. The comorbidity with the closest association with death was immune deficiency, mainly in influenza type B patients.

We investigated the predictors of neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) treatment in severe hospitalised influenza cases and the association between antiviral treatment and mortality. An observational epidemiological study was carried out in Catalonia (Spain) during 2010-2016 in patients aged ⩾18 years. Severe hospitalised cases of laboratory-confirmed influenza requiring hospitalisation were included. We collected demographic, virological and clinical characteristics. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratio (aOR). We included 1727 hospitalised patients, of whom 1577 (91.3%) received NAI. Receiving NAI ⩽48 h after onset of clinical symptoms (aOR 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.63), ⩽3 days (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.79) and ⩽5 days (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.79) was associated with a reduction in deaths. In patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (595; 34.5%), treatment ⩽48 h (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.74), ⩽3 days (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.97) and ⩽5 days (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.96) was associated with a reduction in deaths. Receiving treatment >5 days after onset of clinical symptoms was not associated with the reduction in deaths in hospitalised patients or those admitted to the ICU. NAI treatment of hospitalised patients with severe confirmed influenza was effective in avoiding death, mainly when administered ⩽48 h after symptom onset, but also when no more than 5 days had elapsed.

The effectiveness and safety of shoulder arthroplasties in the general context of a Spanish patient population remains unclear. The aim of this study was to ascertain both the effectiveness and safety of primary shoulder arthroplasties and the prosthesis types used in Spain. A systematic review of all the available literature evaluating the effectiveness and safety of primary shoulder arthroplasties in Spain was performed. A narrative synthesis was performed, and evidence tables were created in four dimensions: study design, arthroplasty characteristics, safety, and effectiveness. Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) scores were used to evaluate prosthesis types. Twenty-one studies were selected that included a total of 1293 arthroplasties. The most common indication was fractures, while the prosthesis most frequently used was the Delta Xtend (ODEP 10A). The most common complication was scapular notching. Prosthesis revision rate was approximately 6% for follow-ups between 12 and 79 months. In addition, significant improvements were observed in the Constant–Murley test score after the intervention. Currently in Spain, shoulder arthroplasty can be considered a safe and effective procedure with functional recovery and pain reduction for eligible patients with humeral fracture, rotator cuff arthropathy, fracture sequelae and malunion of the proximal humerus, and degenerative disease. Future longitudinal research and population-based studies could serve to confirm these results and identify points of improvement.

IntroductionThe methodological guides for the assessment of new/emerging non-pharmacological technologies differ from the traditional health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines developed by the Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS). The aim of this study is to identify the special features and challenges of carrying out HTA on new/emergent non-pharmacological technologies.MethodsThe application of traditional and new/emergent HTA guidelines is compared along the consecutive evaluation phases in four practical cases carried out at the Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS) in 2017-2018.ResultsMain learning and outstanding challenges: (i) Instead of following a defined protocol, the evaluations are carried out from a preliminary short report which generates a lack of justification and delimitation of its scope. (ii) References’ identification and data extraction are often limited due to lack of studies, and sometimes require the use of grey literature or other sources less informative, for example, trial registries. It can be challenging to exclude references related to other indications. (iii) The assessment of resource use and costs of running the technology is complicated due to the lack of public prices information and specific impacts of use. (iv) The evidence considered during the assessment usually does not meet high quality requirements (risk of bias) because of indirect evidence, lack of comparator or no having clearly defined outcomes, among others. (v) It's difficult to draw conclusions and, consequently, recommendations due to abovementioned aspects and especially for the usual evidence gap that faces this type of technology in early stages of diffusion and/or in a competition situation of manufacturer companies.ConclusionsThe most recent innovation in non-pharmacological technologies merits a differentiated assessment approach. However, there is need to reconsider the methodology applied in order to overcome the challenges and limitations identified.