BackgroundCold storage induces chilling injury (CI) disorders in peach fruit (woolliness/mealiness, flesh browning and reddening/bleeding) manifested when ripened at shelf life. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying CI, we analyzed the transcriptome of ‘Oded’ (high tolerant) and ‘Hermoza’ (relatively tolerant to woolliness, but sensitive to browning and bleeding) peach cultivars at pre-symptomatic stages. The expression profiles were compared and validated with two previously analyzed pools (high and low sensitive to woolliness) from the Pop-DG population. The four fruit types cover a wide range of sensitivity to CI. The four fruit types were also investigated with the ROSMETER that provides information on the specificity of the transcriptomic response to oxidative stress.ResultsWe identified quantitative differences in a subset of core cold responsive genes that correlated with sensitivity or tolerance to CI at harvest and during cold storage, and also subsets of genes correlating specifically with high sensitivity to woolliness and browning. Functional analysis indicated that elevated levels, at harvest and during cold storage, of genes related to antioxidant systems and the biosynthesis of metabolites with antioxidant activity correlates with tolerance. Consistent with these results, ROSMETER analysis revealed oxidative stress in ‘Hermoza’ and the progeny pools, but not in the cold resistant ‘Oded’. By contrast, cold storage induced, in sensitivity to woolliness dependant manner, a gene expression program involving the biosynthesis of secondary cell wall and pectins. Furthermore, our results indicated that while ethylene is related to CI tolerance, differential auxin subcellular accumulation and signaling may play a role in determining chilling sensitivity/tolerance. In addition, sugar partitioning and demand during cold storage may also play a role in the tolerance/sensitive mechanism. The analysis also indicates that vesicle trafficking, membrane dynamics and cytoskeleton organization could have a role in the tolerance/sensitive mechanism. In the case of browning, our results suggest that elevated acetaldehyde related genes together with the core cold responses may increase sensitivity to browning in shelf life.ConclusionsOur data suggest that in sensitive fruit a cold response program is activated and regulated by auxin distribution and ethylene and these hormones have a role in sensitivity to CI even before fruit are cold stored.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1395-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Gene expression at harvest was compared for two stone fruit cultivars, a peach and its near-isogenic nectarine mutant, using two microarray platforms, μPEACH1.0 and ChillPeach. Together, both platforms covered over 6,000 genes out of which 417 were differentially expressed between the fruits of the two cultivars at a p value of 0.05. A total of 47 genes in nectarine and 60 genes in peach were at least twofold higher relative to each other. Nectarine had much better storage characteristics than peach and could be stored for over 5 weeks at 5 °C without storage disorders. In an attempt to determine whether gene expression at harvest could give an indication of storage potential, the expression analysis of the two cultivars was compared to that of two genotypes with different sensitivities to chilling injury. Principal component analysis of gene expression results across four fruit types differing in chilling sensitivity resulted in 41 genes whose expression levels separated the fruits according to sensitivity to storage disorders, suggesting that the genes have a role in cold response adaptation
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.