A large body of experimental evidence suggests that neuroinflammation is a key pathological event triggering and perpetuating the neurodegenerative process associated with many neurological diseases. Therefore, different stimuli, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), are used to model neuroinflammation associated with neurodegeneration. By acting at its receptors, LPS activates various intracellular molecules, which alter the expression of a plethora of inflammatory mediators. These factors, in turn, initiate or contribute to the development of neurodegenerative processes. Therefore, LPS is an important tool for the study of neuroinflammation associated with neurodegenerative diseases. However, the serotype, route of administration, and number of injections of this toxin induce varied pathological responses. Thus, here, we review the use of LPS in various models of neurodegeneration as well as discuss the neuroinflammatory mechanisms induced by this toxin that could underpin the pathological events linked to the neurodegenerative process.

Background: Neuroinflammatory responses are triggered by diverse ethiologies and can provide either beneficial or harmful results. Microglial cells are the major cell type involved in neuroinflammation, releasing several mediators, which contribute to the neuronal demise in several diseases including cerebral ischemia and neurodegenerative disorders. Attenuation of microglial activation has been shown to confer protection against different types of brain injury. Recent evidence suggests that resveratrol has anti-inflammatory and potent antioxidant properties. It has been also shown that resveratrol is a potent inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 activity. Previous findings have demonstrated that this compound is able to reduce neuronal injury in different models, both in vitro and in vivo. The aim of this study was to examine whether resveratrol is able to reduce prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) and 8-iso-prostaglandin F 2α (8-iso-PGF 2α ) production by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated primary rat microglia.

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is among the most important mediators involved in neuroinflammatory processes. The final step of its synthesis is regulated by enzymes termed prostaglandin E2 synthases (PGES). Three PGES are known, cytosolic (c)PGES, membrane-associated (m)PGES-1 and mPGES-2. The expression of mPGES-1 is induced by inflammatory stimuli such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin (IL)-1beta, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Although some roles of mPGES-1 have already been suggested, its function in the CNS and the signaling pathways involved in its upregulation are poorly understood. In this study, we examined the regulation of mPGES-1 in primary rat microglia and the signaling pathways involved in its expression. Whereas the expression of cPGES and mPGES-2 was not stimulated by LPS, low doses of LPS (0.1-1 ng/mL) sufficiently stimulated mPGES-1 mRNA expression. A corresponding protein synthesis, however, was obtained only with higher doses (10-100 ng/mL). The LPS-induced increase of mPGES-1 was inhibited by different signaling pathway inhibitors, such as SP600125, LY294002, GF109203X, and SC-514, suggesting the involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)/Akt, protein kinase C (PKC) pathways, and the nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB, respectively. In contrast to other reports, LPS-induced mPGES-1 synthesis was not invariably coupled to the synthesis of COX-2, since inhibition of PI-3K with LY294002 decreased mPGES-1 but increased COX-2 levels. This detailed view of the intracellular signaling pathways involved in mPGES-1 expression in activated microglia opens a new avenue in the search for novel potential therapeutic targets to reduce neuroinflammation, and demonstrates that mPGES-1 expression is not strictly coupled to the expression of COX-2.

Neurodegenerative diseases are pathological conditions that have an insidious onset and chronic progression. Different models have been established to study these diseases in order to understand their underlying mechanisms and to investigate new therapeutic strategies. Although various in vivo models are currently in use, in vitro models might provide important insights about the pathogenesis of these disorders and represent an interesting approach for the screening of potential pharmacological agents. In the present review, we discuss various in vitro and ex vivo models of neurodegenerative disorders in mammalian cells and tissues.

No abstract