To understand the effects of temperature on biological systems, we compile, organize, and analyze a database of 1,072 thermal responses for microbes, plants, and animals. The unprecedented diversity of traits (n = 112), species (n = 309), body sizes (15 orders of magnitude), and habitats (all major biomes) in our database allows us to quantify novel features of the temperature response of biological traits. In particular, analysis of the rising component of within-species (intraspecific) responses reveals that 87% are fit well by the Boltzmann-Arrhenius model. The mean activation energy for these rises is 0.66 ± 0.05 eV, similar to the reported acrossspecies (interspecific) value of 0.65 eV. However, systematic variation in the distribution of rise activation energies is evident, including previously unrecognized right skewness around a median of 0.55 eV. This skewness exists across levels of organization, taxa, trophic groups, and habitats, and it is partially explained by prey having increased trait performance at lower temperatures relative to predators, suggesting a thermal version of the life-dinner principlestronger selection on running for your life than running for your dinner. For unimodal responses, habitat (marine, freshwater, and terrestrial) largely explains the mean temperature at which trait values are optimal but not variation around the mean. The distribution of activation energies for trait falls has a mean of 1.15 ± 0.39 eV (significantly higher than rises) and is also right-skewed. Our results highlight generalities and deviations in the thermal response of biological traits and help to provide a basis to predict better how biological systems, from cells to communities, respond to temperature change. I nvestigation of the thermal response of diverse biological processes should reveal general mechanisms by which life responds to Earth's complex and rapidly changing thermal landscape (1). General patterns of how temperature affects biological systems can be deduced in at least two ways. First, physiological and ecological traits (e.g., metabolic rate, encounter rate) can be measured for each species at its optimal temperature and plotted together to construct a single curve across species (2, 3). This interspecific approach has been used extensively (2-8), including studies of how climate affects biological systems (8-11). Second, a curve can be constructed by measuring trait values across a range of temperatures for a single species (intraspecific) (12, 13). In both intra-and interspecific cases, each curve can be characterized by its Q 10 value or activation energy (4, 6). These parameters, along with optimal temperature and response breadth for intraspecific responses, can be contrasted to explore effects of taxa, traits, and habitats. Indeed, for nearly a century, intraspecific studies have been conducted on a huge diversity of physiological and ecological traits (3,6,12,(14)(15)(16)(17). Comparative studies of these intraspecific data have tended to focus on a subset of available data (16,...

Summary 1.Environmental temperature has systematic effects on rates of species interactions, primarily through its influence on organismal physiology. 2. We present a mechanistic model for the thermal response of consumer-resource interactions. We focus on how temperature affects species interactions via key traits -body velocity, detection distance, search rate and handling time -that underlie per capita consumption rate. The model is general because it applies to all foraging strategies: active-capture (both consumer and resource body velocity are important), sit-and-wait (resource velocity dominates) and grazing (consumer velocity dominates). 3. The model predicts that temperature influences consumer-resource interactions primarily through its effects on body velocity (either of the consumer, resource or both), which determines how often consumers and resources encounter each other, and that asymmetries in the thermal responses of interacting species can introduce qualitative, not just quantitative, changes in consumer-resource dynamics. We illustrate this by showing how asymmetries in thermal responses determine equilibrium population densities in interacting consumer-resource pairs. 4. We test for the existence of asymmetries in consumer-resource thermal responses by analysing an extensive database on thermal response curves of ecological traits for 309 species spanning 15 orders of magnitude in body size from terrestrial, marine and freshwater habitats. We find that asymmetries in consumer-resource thermal responses are likely to be a common occurrence. 5. Overall, our study reveals the importance of asymmetric thermal responses in consumer-resource dynamics. In particular, we identify three general types of asymmetries: (i) different levels of performance of the response, (ii) different rates of response (e.g. activation energies) and (iii) different peak or optimal temperatures. Such asymmetries should occur more frequently as the climate changes and species' geographical distributions and phenologies are altered, such that previously noninteracting species come into contact. 6. By using characteristics of trophic interactions that are often well known, such as body size, foraging strategy, thermy and environmental temperature, our framework should allow more accurate predictions about the thermal dependence of consumer-resource interactions. Ultimately, integration of our theory into models of food web and ecosystem dynamics should be useful in understanding how natural systems will respond to current and future temperature change.

Trophic interactions govern biomass fluxes in ecosystems, and stability in food webs. Knowledge of how trophic interaction strengths are affected by differences among habitats is crucial for understanding variation in ecological systems. Here we show how substantial variation in consumption-rate data, and hence trophic interaction strengths, arises because consumers tend to encounter resources more frequently in three dimensions (3D) (for example, arboreal and pelagic zones) than two dimensions (2D) (for example, terrestrial and benthic zones). By combining new theory with extensive data (376 species, with body masses ranging from 5.24 × 10(-14) kg to 800 kg), we find that consumption rates scale sublinearly with consumer body mass (exponent of approximately 0.85) for 2D interactions, but superlinearly (exponent of approximately 1.06) for 3D interactions. These results contradict the currently widespread assumption of a single exponent (of approximately 0.75) in consumer-resource and food-web research. Further analysis of 2,929 consumer-resource interactions shows that dimensionality of consumer search space is probably a major driver of species coexistence, and the stability and abundance of populations.

The behavior of individuals determines the strength and outcome of ecological interactions, which drive population, community, and ecosystem organization. Bio-logging, such as telemetry and animal-borne imaging, provides essential individual viewpoints, tracks, and life histories, but requires capture of individuals and is often impractical to scale. Recent developments in automated image-based tracking offers opportunities to remotely quantify and understand individual behavior at scales and resolutions not previously possible, providing an essential supplement to other tracking methodologies in ecology. Automated image-based tracking should continue to advance the field of ecology by enabling better understanding of the linkages between individual and higher-level ecological processes, via high-throughput quantitative analysis of complex ecological patterns and processes across scales, including analysis of environmental drivers. Measuring behaviorIndividual behavior (see Glossary) underlies almost all aspects of ecology [1][2][3][4][5]. Accurate and highly resolved behavioral data are therefore critical for obtaining a mechanistic and predictive understanding of ecological systems [5]. Historically, direct observation by trained biologists was used to quantify behavior [6,7]. However, the extent and resolution to which direct observations can be made is highly constrained [8] and the number of individuals that can be observed simultaneously is small. In addition, an exact record of events is not preserved, only the biologist's subjective account of them.Recent technological advances in tracking now make it possible to collect large amounts of highly precise and accurate behavioral data. For many organisms equipment can be attached that provide information about the Glossary Background subtraction: a method used by software to compare the current video frame with a stored picture of the background; any pixel of the current frame that is significantly different from the corresponding pixel in the background is likely to be associated with the body of an animal. Useful in situations where the background is unchanging, for example, when the surface of the background is rigid and lighting does not change. Behavior: the actions of individuals, often in response to stimuli. Behavior can involve movement of the individual's body through space, such as walking or chasing, or can occur while the animal is stationary, such as grooming or eating. Bio-logging: attachment or implantation of equipment to organisms to provide information about their identity, location, behavior, or physiology (e.g., global positioning systems, accelerometers, video cameras, telemetry tags). Ecological interaction: any interaction between an organism and its environment, or between two organisms (i.e., including interactions between conspecifics). Fingerprinting: a method used to identify unmarked individuals using natural variation in their physical and/or behavioral appearance. The method works by transforming the images of each individual ...