The purpose of this study was to investigate the existence and extent of cognitive impairment in type 1 diabetic children with episodes of recurrent severe hypoglycemia, using meta-analysis to synthesize data across studies. The meta-analysis sample included: 441 children with diabetes and recurrent severe hypoglycemia, 560 children with diabetes and without recurrent severe hypoglycemia. Overall, children with type 1 diabetes and recurrent severe hypoglycemia had slightly lower performance than diabetic children without severe hypoglycemia, only in some cognitive domains: intelligence, memory, learning, and verbal fluency/language. Greater impairment was found in memory and learning. No impairment was found for motor speed. Our results seem to confirm the hypothesis that recurrent severe hypoglycemia has a selective negative effect on the children's cognitive functions. However, these results must be considered with caution taking into account factors such as small sample sizes, the different definitions of severe hypoglycemia, and the variety of neuropsychological tests used.

No abstract

No abstract

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 1) is a common chronic disease of childhood occurring throughout the world. In the literature, its most important determinants include genetic, environmental and familial factors. We evaluated family history as a determinant of the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus with a population-based case-control study. Information about type 1 patients was taken from the dedicated register of the Abruzzo Region; the register has been collecting incident cases in the age group 0-14 years, diagnosed between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1996. The control group was taken from the lists of patients attending family pediatricians. The family history data for type 1 and type 2 patients was obtained by a questionnaire, administered to their parents. The risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus associated with its occurrence in first- and second-degree relatives was estimated using logistic regression methods. Our results show that the risk is indeed increased with a positive family history (OR=3.96; 95% CI 1.54-10.14). This shows that the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus for children whose fathers are affected by the disease is 11 times higher with respect to controls. Moreover, the risk for children whose brothers are affected by the disease is 20 times higher with respect to controls. In contrast, a family history for type 2 diabetes mellitus does not influence the risk.

Oxidative stress is present in both SGA+ and SGA- children, with a continuous alteration in relation to IR. Therefore, catch-up growth might exert the greatest influence in the development of future diseases.