Two different time-sharing strategies that appeared to be related to different aetiology were found in the patients, indicating different control of the driving task. It is proposed that standardized on-road dual tasks should be used for detecting problems in allocation of attention during driving.
The aim of this study was to find out the neuropsychological measures correlating with overlong glances at secondary in-car tasks while driving. Fifteen. patients with brain damage (without clear neurological or neuropsychological restriction on driving a car) and 11 healthy participants drove a route of 126 km and performed a series of secondary tasks while driving on a highway in an instrumented compact car. Four videocameras allowed detailed analysis of glances during in-car tasks. Neuropsychological measures focused on executive functions, memory, visuospatial skills, and fine motor skills. Moreover, patients' emotional self-evaluation and relatives' evaluation of patients' competencies were included. The proportion of overlong glances away from the road during in-car tasks was greater among the patients than. the healthy drivers. The long glances of the patients correlated strongly with motor and visuospatial deficits, cognitive inflexibility, emotional symptoms, and relatives' evaluations of patients' impaired sensomotor abilities. The results suggest that the frequency of overlong glances was increased by 2 factors: (a) impaired motor and visuospatial skills that evidently caused difficulties in the manipulation of the equipment of the secondary tasks, and (b) impairments of executive functions that were likely to decrease the ability to control the risks related to long glances at the in-car tasks. The slowing of speed during secondary tasks was on the average rather slight and not significantly more pronounced among patients than control drivers, indicating that patients failed to reduce their speed and thus the risk related to prolonged glances at in-car tasks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.