OBJECTIVES:To determine the viruses and risk factors associated with hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in infants with acute bronchiolitis.INTRODUCTION:Bronchiolitis is a major cause of morbidity in infants. Widespread use of molecular-based methods has yielded new insights about its etiology, but the impact of viral etiologies on early outcomes is still unclear.METHODS:Seventy-seven infants with bronchiolitis who were under two years of age and visited an emergency unit were included. Using molecular-based methods, samples were tested for 12 different respiratory viruses. Logistic regression models were used to identify clinical and virological variables associated with the main endpoints: hospital admission and ICU admission.RESULTS:We identified at least one virus in 93.5% of patients, and coinfections were found in nearly 40% of patients. RSV was the most common pathogen (63.6%), followed by rhinovirus (39%). Identification of RSV was only associated with an increased risk of hospital admission in the univariate model. Younger age and enterovirus infection were associated with an increased risk of hospital admission, while atopy of a first-degree relative showed a protective effect. Prematurity was associated with an increased risk of admission to the ICU. Coinfections were not associated with worse outcomes.CONCLUSIONS:Molecular-based methods resulted in high rates of viral identification but did not change the significant role of RSV in acute bronchiolitis. Younger age and enterovirus infection were risk factors for hospital admission, while prematurity appeared to be a significant risk factor for admission to the ICU in acute viral bronchiolitis.

Objectives: In the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI), the time delay to achieve reperfusion of the infarction-related artery has been linked to survival rates. Primary or direct angioplasty has been found to be an excellent means of achieving reperfusion in acute ST-elevation MI compared to thrombolytic therapy in randomized trials. However, no mortality benefit of primary angioplasty over thrombolysis was observed in several registries, in which delays in performing primary angioplasty were longer. Our objectives were to evaluate the door-to-balloon time (DBT) in our institution and investigate its relationship with clinical and prognostic variables. Methods:We studied, retrospectively, 67 patients submitted to primary angioplasty, from January 1999 to November 2000. We divided our patient population into two groups. Group A (GA) included patients with DBT less than 120 min and group B (GB) patients with DBT greater or equal to 120 min. We evaluated several clinical variables, such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on their first echocardiogram during hospitalization, admission Killip classification, in-hospital length of stay (LOS) and major cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization and up to 6-month follow-up (in 23 patients). Results:The median DBT was 132 min and the mean was 165 min, with a standard deviation of 137 min for all the cases. We had 32 patients in the GA and 35 patients (52%) in the GB. We observed four in-hospital deaths, all in GB. The mean LVEF was 53.1 ± 9% in GA and 46.1 ± 13% in GB (P = 0.059). Admission Killip class greater than 1 was noted in three patients of each group. The in-hospital LOS was similar for both groups (GA = 8.35 ± 4 and GB = 8.33 ± 4 days; NS). In-hospital events occurred in eight patients of GA (25%) and seven patients of GB (20%; NS). Only five follow-up events occurred during the first 6 months, three events in GA patients and two in GB patients (NS). Conclusion:DBT greater than or equal to 2 h are common and in our population it occurred in more than half of the primary angioplasties. Greater than 2 h DBTs were associated with a trend to larger left ventricular dysfunction early after MI. Monitoring and measures to reduce DBT are crucial for the potential prognosis improvement offered by primary angioplasty and for the broadening of its use in the management of acute MI. P2Primary angioplasty versus streptokinase in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction PF Leite, M Park, VS Kawabata, MS Barduco, S Timerman, LF Cardoso, JAF Ramires Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil Because only a few studies about acute myocardial infarction (AMI) include elderly patients, we compared outcomes of patients aged 70 years or older with AMI who underwent thrombolysis or primary angioplasty treatment. Methods:From April 1995 to June 1999, 64 patients within 12 h of symptom onset and no contraindications for thrombolytic therapy were randomized in two groups. Group I (32 patients, 20 men) sub...