Background Transesophageal echocardiography–guided direct cardioversion is recommended in patients who are inadequately anticoagulated due to perceived risk of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT); however, LAAT risk factors remain poorly defined. Methods and Results We evaluated clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters to predict LAAT risk in consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion between 2002 and 2022. Regression analysis identified predictors of LAAT, combined to create the novel CLOTS‐AF risk score (comprising clinical and echocardiographic LAAT predictors), which was developed in the derivation cohort (70%) and validated in the remaining 30%. A total of 1001 patients (mean age, 62±13 years; 25% women; left ventricular ejection fraction, 49.8±14%) underwent transesophageal echocardiography, with LAAT identified in 140 of 1001 patients (14%) and dense spontaneous echo contrast precluding cardioversion in a further 75 patients (7.5%). AF duration, AF rhythm, creatinine, stroke, diabetes, and echocardiographic parameters were univariate LAAT predictors; age, female sex, body mass index, anticoagulant type, and duration were not (all P >0.05). CHADS 2 VASc, though significant on univariate analysis ( P <0.001), was not significant after adjustment ( P =0.12). The novel CLOTS‐AF risk model comprised significant multivariable predictors categorized and weighted according to clinically relevant thresholds (Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, Left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, Overload (left atrial volume index >34 mL/m 2 ), Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) <17 mm, Stroke, and AF rhythm). The unweighted risk model had excellent predictive performance with an area under the curve of 0.820 (95% CI, 0.752–0.887). The weighted CLOTS‐AF risk score maintained good predictive performance (AUC, 0.780) with an accuracy of 72%. Conclusions The incidence of LAAT or dense spontaneous echo contrast precluding cardioversion in patients with AF who are inadequately anticoagulated is 21%. Clinical and noninvasive echocardiographic parameters may identify patients at increased risk of LAAT better managed with a suitable period of anticoagulation before undertaking cardioversion.

Background The diagnostic work‐up for cardiac arrest from ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring in younger adults and structurally normal hearts is variable and often incomplete. Methods We reviewed records for all recipients of a secondary prevention implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) younger than 60 years at a single quaternary referral hospital from 2010 to 2021. Patients with unexplained ventricular arrhythmias (UVA) were identified as those with no structural heart disease on echocardiogram, no obstructive coronary disease, and no clear diagnostic features on ECG. We specifically evaluated the adoption rate of five modalities of “second‐line” cardiac investigations: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), exercise ECG, flecainide challenge, electrophysiology study (EPS), and genetic testing. We also evaluated patterns of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and device‐detected arrhythmias and compared them with secondary prevention ICD recipients with a clear etiology found on initial assessment. Results One hundred and two recipients of a secondary prevention ICD under the age of 60 were analyzed. Thirty‐nine patients (38.2%) were identified with UVA and were compared with the remaining 63 patients with VA of clear etiology (61.8%). UVA patients were younger (35.6 ± 13.0 vs. 46.0 ± 8.6 years, p < .001) and were more often female (48.7% vs. 28.6%, p = .04). CMR was performed in 32 patients with UVA (82.1%), whereas flecainide challenge, stress ECG, genetic testing, and EPS were only performed in a minority of patients. Overall, the use of a second‐line investigation suggested an etiology in 17 patients with UVA (43.5%). Compared to patients with VA of clear etiology, UVA patients had lower rates of antiarrhythmic drug prescription (64.1% vs. 88.9%, p = .003) and had a higher rate of device‐delivered tachy‐therapies (30.8% vs. 14.3%, p = .045). Conclusion In this real‐world analysis of patients with UVA, the diagnostic work‐up is often incomplete. While CMR was increasingly utilized at our institution, investigations for channelopathies and genetic causes appear to be underutilized. Implementation of a systematic protocol for work‐up of these patients requires further study.

Background The long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults are poorly described in the literature. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive younger adult patients (18–50 years) undergoing pacemaker implantation at a quaternary hospital between 1986–2020. Defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices were excluded. All clinical records, pacemaker checks and echocardiograms were reviewed. Results 81 patients (39.5±9.6 years, 53% male) underwent pacemaker implantation. Indications were complete heart block (41%), sinus node dysfunction (33%), high grade AV block (11%) and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (7%). During a median 7.6 (IQR=0.6–14.8) years follow-up, 9 patients (11%) developed 13 late device-related complications (generator or lead malfunction requiring reoperation (n=11), device infection (n=1) and pocket revision (n=1)). Five of these patients were &lt;40 years old at time of pacemaker insertion. At long-term follow-up, a further 9 patients (11%) experienced significant symptoms from inadequate lead performance managed with device reprogramming. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was detected in 2 patients (2%). Deterioration in ventricular function (LVEF decline &gt;10%) was observed in 14 patients (17%) and 7 of these patients required subsequent biventricular upgrade. Furthermore, 4 patients (5%) developed new tricuspid regurgitation (≥ moderate-severe). Of 69 patients with available long-term pacing data, minimal pacemaker utilisation (pacing &lt;5% at all checks) was observed in 13 (19%) patients. Conclusions Pacemaker insertion in younger adults has significant long-term implications. Clinicians should carefully consider pacemaker insertion in this cohort given risk of device-related complications, potential for device under-utilisation and issues related to lead longevity. In addition, patients require close follow-up for development of structural abnormalities and arrhythmias. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

No abstract

No abstract