No abstract

No abstract

Stimuli-responsive materials have the potential to enable the generation of new bioinspired devices with unique physicochemical properties and cell-instructive ability. Enhancing biocompatibility while simplifying the production methodologies, as well as enabling the creation of complex constructs, i.e., via 3D (bio)printing technologies, remains key challenge in the field. Here, a novel method is presented to biofabricate cellularized anisotropic hybrid hydrogel through a mild and biocompatible process driven by multiple external stimuli: magnetic field, temperature, and light. A low-intensity magnetic field is used to align mosaic iron oxide nanoparticles (IOPs) into filaments with tunable size within a gelatin methacryloyl matrix. Cells seeded on top or embedded within the hydrogel align to the same axes of the IOPs filaments. Furthermore, in 3D, C2C12 skeletal myoblasts differentiate toward myotubes even in the absence of differentiation media. 3D printing of the nanocomposite hydrogel is achieved and creation of complex heterogeneous structures that respond to magnetic field is demonstrated. By combining the advanced, stimuli-responsive hydrogel with the architectural control provided by bioprinting technologies, 3D constructs can also be created that, although inspired by nature, express functionalities beyond those of native tissue, which have important application in soft robotics, bioactuators, and bionic devices.

Extrusion-based three-dimensional bioprinting relies on bioinks engineered to combine viscoelastic properties for extrusion and shape retention, and biological properties for cytocompatibility and tissue regeneration. To satisfy these conflicting requirements, bioinks often utilize either complex mixtures or complex modifications of biopolymers. In this paper we introduce and characterize a bioink exploiting a dual crosslinking mechanism, where an enzymatic reaction forms a soft gel suitable for cell encapsulation and extrusion, while a visible light photo-crosslinking allows shape retention of the printed construct. The influence of cell density and cell type on the rheological and printability properties was assessed correlating the printing outcomes with the damping factor, a rheological characteristic independent of the printing system. Stem cells, chondrocytes and fibroblasts were encapsulated, and their viability was assessed up to 14 days with live/dead, alamar blue and trypan blue assays. Additionally, the impact of the printing parameters on cell viability was investigated. Owing to its straightforward preparation, low modification, presence of two independent crosslinking mechanisms for tuning shear-thinning independently of the final shape fixation, the use of visible green instead of UV light, the possibility of encapsulating and sustaining the viability of different cell types, the hyaluronan bioink here presented is a valid biofabrication tool for producing 3D printed tissue-engineered constructs.

Bone is a hard yet dynamic tissue with remarkable healing capacities. Research to date has greatly advanced the understanding of how bone heals and has led to marked success in the treatment of bone injuries. Nevertheless, the effective treatment of nonunions and large bone defects continues to present a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Biomaterials provide researchers with a powerful instrument to potentially guide effective bone tissue regeneration in challenging healing environments. However, the most appropriate biomaterial for bone tissue engineering continues to be an area of intense debate. Indeed, the mechanical properties of real bone can be reproduced in vitro but the development of a functional bone substitute goes beyond the sole mechanical properties. The faithful reproduction of bone as a functional organ requires the combination of different cell types and temporal regulation of the molecular signaling involved during the different stages of bone formation and regeneration. This is not at all a trivial task. Herein, critical aspects of bone healing/regeneration including mechanical loading, inflammation, vascularization, and innervation are described. The success and the challenges behind the development of biomaterials, and the technologies used to functionalize them, in order to support the underlying cellular mechanisms are also highlighted.