How mixtures of immune cells associate with cancer cell phenotype and affect pathogenesis is still unclear. In 15 breast cancer gene expression datasets, we invariably identify three clusters of patients with gradual levels of immune infiltration. The intermediate immune infiltration cluster (Cluster B) is associated with a worse prognosis independently of known clinicopathological features. Furthermore, immune clusters are associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In silico dissection of the immune contexture of the clusters identified Cluster A as immune cold, Cluster C as immune hot while Cluster B has a pro-tumorigenic immune infiltration. Through phenotypical analysis, we find epithelial mesenchymal transition and proliferation associated with the immune clusters and mutually exclusive in breast cancers. Here, we describe immune clusters which improve the prognostic accuracy of immune contexture in breast cancer. Our discovery of a novel independent prognostic factor in breast cancer highlights a correlation between tumor phenotype and immune contexture.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy against metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) but only for PD-L1positive disease. The randomized, placebo-controlled ALICE trial (NCT03164993, 24 May 2017) evaluated the addition of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) to immune-stimulating chemotherapy in mTNBC. Patients received pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with atezolizumab (atezo-chemo; n = 40) or placebo (placebo-chemo; n = 28). Primary endpoints were descriptive assessment of progression-free survival in the per-protocol population (>3 atezolizumab and >2 PLD doses; n = 59) and safety in the full analysis set (FAS; all patients starting therapy; n = 68). Adverse events leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 18% of patients in the atezo-chemo arm (7/40) and in 7% of patients in the placebo-chemo arm (2/28). Improvement in progression-free survival was indicated in the atezo-chemo arm in the per-protocol population (median 4.3 months versus 3.5 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33–0.99; log-rank P = 0.047) and in the FAS (HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.33–0.95; P = 0.033). A numerical advantage was observed for both the PD-L1positive (n = 27; HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.27–1.54) and PD-L1negative subgroups (n = 31; HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.27–1.21). The progression-free proportion after 15 months was 14.7% (5/34; 95% CI 6.4–30.1%) in the atezo-chemo arm versus 0% in the placebo-chemo arm. The addition of atezolizumab to PLD/cyclophosphamide was tolerable with an indication of clinical benefit, and the findings warrant further investigation of PD1/PD-L1 blockers in combination with immunomodulatory chemotherapy.
Background: Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CI) represents an important novel development in cancer treatment. Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is incurable, with a median survival of only ~ 13 months. We have initiated the randomized placebo-controlled phase IIb study ALICE, evaluating PD-L1 blockade combined with immunogenic chemotherapy in mTNBC patients (n = 75). Intriguingly, the host immune response is strongly predictive for the effect of chemotherapy in mTNBC. In the ALICE trial, we release the brake on the immune response by use of atezolizumab, an inhibitory antibody against PD-L1. We utilize anthracyclines, shown to trigger the immune system, and low-dose cyclophosphamide, which has been reported to counter immunosuppressive cells. Methods: ALICE is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab when combined with immunogenic chemotherapy in subjects with mTNBC. The trial will enroll 75 evaluable subjects, randomized 2:3 into two arms (A:B). The patients receive identical chemotherapy, i.e. pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD 20 mg/m 2 intravenously every 2nd week) + cyclophosphamide (50 mg per day, first 2 weeks in each 4 week cycle). Patients in arm A receive placebo, while patients in arm B receive atezolizumab. The primary objectives are assessment of toxicity and progression-free survival. The secondary objectives include overall survival, tumor response rate, clinical benefit rate, patient reported outcomes, biomarkers and assessment of tumor-immune evolution during therapy. Discussion: The question of how CI should be combined with chemotherapy, is a key challenge facing the field. There is a strong preclinical rationale for exploring if anthracyclines, which are considered to induce immunogenic cell death, synergize with PD-L1 blockade, and if low-dose cyclophosphamide counters tumor tolerance. However, the data from patients is as yet very limited, and the clinical evaluation of these hypotheses is among the key objectives in the ALICE trial. The study includes extensive biobanking and translational sub-projects, also addressing other clinically important questions. These analyses may uncover mechanisms of drug efficacy or tumor resistance, and identify biomarkers allowing personalized therapy. If the trial suggests acceptable safety of the ALICE therapy and provide a signal of clinical efficacy, further studies are warranted.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have shown efficacy against metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), but only for PD-L1 positive tumors. It is not known if so-called immunogenic chemotherapies may yield clinical relevant synergies with CPI. We addressed these issues, by conducting a trial evaluating atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) in combination with doxorubicin, which has been reported to provoke immunogenic cell death, and low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide, which has been reported to counter immunosuppressive cells. The pegylated liposomal form of doxorubicin (PLD) was selected to avoid steroids and allow for long term therapy in responders. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial reporting on the concomitant addition of CPI to antracyclines in mTNBC. Methods: The trial enrolled patients with mTNBC and maximum one previous line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Patients were randomized 2:3 into arm A (n=28), receiving chemotherapy alone, or arm B (n=40), receiving chemotherapy in combination with atezolizumab (840 mg every 2nd week). The chemotherapy consisted of PLD (20mg/m2 every 2nd week) + oral cyclophosphamide (cyclo; 50mg/day, 2/4 weeks) in both arms. The per protocol (PP) population was defined as patients receiving > 3 doses of atezolizumab and >2 doses of PLD. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the PP population. The protocol power analysis focused on durable response, as measured by 15 months PFS. Safety, a co-primary endpoint, was evaluated in all patients that started therapy (Full Analysis Set; FAS). Secondary endpoints included PFS in FAS, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), durable response rate (>6 months; DRR), overall survival (OS) and biomarkers. PD-L1 status was determined retrospectively by the Ventana SP142 assay, as tumor-infiltrating immune cells with cut-off ≥ 1%. Efficacy data are given in the PP population unless stated otherwise. Hazard ratios (HR) are given with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 68 patients started therapy (FAS), of which 59 were in the PP population and 57% had not received previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. PFS was significantly improved in arm B compared to arm A in both the PP population (HR 0.57; CI 0.33-0.99; p=0.0477) and in the FAS (HR 0.56; CI 0.33-0.95; p=0.0326). Median PFS was 4.3 months in arm B versus 3.5 months in arm A. The progression-free proportion after 15 months was 14.7% (CI 6.4-30.1%) in arm B versus 0% in arm A. The ORR was 30.6%/21.7%, CBR was 52.8%/43.5% and DRR was 13.9%/4.3% in arm B/A. The PFS advantage was observed for both PD-L1+ (n=27; HR 0.58) and PD-L1- subjects (n=31; HR 0.66). All five patients without progression after 15 months belonged to arm B, and three out of these patients were PD-L1 negative. Serious adverse events occurred for 48% in arm B and 29% in arm A (FAS). The most common immune related adverse events of any grade in arm B/A were hypothyroidism (10.0%/7.1 %), pneumonitis (10.0%/3.6%), hyperthyroidism (5.0%/7.1%) and rash (7.5%/3.6%). Further biomarker analyses and assessments of immunological changes during therapy are ongoing. Conclusions: The addition of atezolizumab to PLD and low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide significantly improved PFS. A benefit was indicated also in patients with PD-L1 negative disease. The combination regimen was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Results from the ongoing analyses of consecutive tumor and blood samples will be important to assess the hypothesized immunological effects of the chemotherapy and to investigate biomarkers associated with the response to the combined treatment. Citation Format: Jon Amund Kyte, Andreas H. Røssevold, Nikolai K. Andresen, Christina Annette Bjerre, Bjørnar Gilje, Erik Hugger Jakobsen, Sunil Xavier Raj, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Elin Borgen, Thea Jahr, Øystein Garred, Jon Lømo, Randi Margit Mathiesen, Bjørn Naume. PD11-11 Results from ALICE – Atezolizumab Combined with Immunogenic Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer, a Randomized Phase IIb Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-11.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.