To determine whether awake EEG criteria can differentiate epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and waves during sleep (EE-CSWS) at the time of cognitive regression from typical, self-limited focal epilepsy (SFE). Methods: This retrospective case-control study was based on the analysis of awake EEGs and included 15 patients with EE-CSWS and 15 age-matched and sex-matched patients with typical SFE. The EEGs were anonymised and scored by four independent readers. The following qualitative and quantitative EEG indices were analysed: slowwave index (SLWI), spike-wave index (SWI), spike-wave frequency (SWF), long spike-wave clusters (CLSW) and EEG score (between grades 0 and 4). Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and their reproducibility with a kappa test. Results: Based on a highly sensitive cut-off, EE-CSWS patients were 8.4 times more likely than those with SFE to have an SLWI > 6%, 15 times more likely to have an SWI > 10 % and six times more likely to have a CLSW of ≥ 1 s. There was substantial agreement between readers (with kappa values of 0.64, 0.69 and 0.67). EE-CSWS patients were 13 times more likely to have an SWF of > 11 % and 149 times more likely to have an EEG score of ≥ 3 than typical SFE patients. Agreement about these ratings was almost perfect (kappa 0.91 and 0.86). Conclusion:An EEG score of ≥ 3 on a 20-min awake EEG differentiates typical SFE from EE-CSWS at the time of cognitive regression, with good reliability across readers with different levels of expertise.
Background Infectious diseases account for the third most common cause of neonatal deaths. Globally, antibiotic resistance (ABR) has been increasingly challenging neonatal sepsis treatment, with 26 to 84% of gram-negative bacteria resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. In sub-Saharan Africa, limited evidence is available regarding the neonatal microbiology and ABR. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed neonatal bacterial infections and ABR in Central-African Republic (CAR). Therefore, this study aimed to describe the pathogens isolated and their specific ABR among patients with suspected antibiotic-resistant neonatal infection admitted in a CAR neonatal unit. Methods This retrospective cohort study included neonates admitted in the neonatal unit in Bangui, CAR, from December 2018 to March 2020, with suspected antibiotic-resistant neonatal infection and subsequent blood culture. We described the frequency of pathogens isolated from blood cultures, their ABR prevalence, and factors associated with fatal outcome. Results Blood cultures were positive in 33 (26.6%) of 124 patients tested (17.9% for early-onset and 46.3% for late-onset infection; p = 0.002). Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 87.9% of positive samples; with most frequently isolated bacteria being Klebsiella pneumoniae (39.4%), Escherichia coli (21.2%) and Klebsiella oxytoca (18.2%). All tested bacteria were resistant to ampicillin. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins was observed in 100% of tested Klebsiella pneumoniae, 83.3% of isolated Klebsiella oxytoca and 50.0% of tested Escherichia coli. None of the tested bacteria were resistant to carbapenems. Approximately 85.7 and 77.8% of gram-negative tested bacteria were resistant to first-line (ampicillin-gentamicin) and second-line (third-generation cephalosporins) treatments, respectively. In hospital mortality, adjusted for blood culture result, presence of asphyxia, birth weight and sex was higher among neonates with positive blood culture (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17–4.60), male sex (aRR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.01–4.26), asphyxia (aRR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.07–5.47) and very low birth weight (1000–1499 g) (aRR = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.3–5.79). Conclusion Overall, 77.8% of confirmed gram-negative neonatal infections could no longer effectively be treated without broad-spectrum antibiotics that are not routinely used in sub-Saharan Africa referral hospitals. Carbapenems should be considered an option in hospitals with surveillance and antibiotic stewardship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.