Small cell lung cancer accounts for 13-15% of all lung cancer worldwide. There has been a decrease in the number of cases, with no clear explanation, except probably to changing in smoking habits in the last two decades. In the early eighties, it became clear that SCLC was an extremely sensitive tumor as to radiation as to chemotheraputic agents. With cisplatinum etoposide combinations or cyclophosphamide, anthracycline and vincristine/etyoposide regimens responses were observed in 50-70%, with 20-30% complete remissions in extensive disease. For limited stage patients chemotherapy associated with thoracic radiation was able to produce a cure rate of 10-20%. The addition of prophylactic brain irradiation to limited stage cases has reduced mortality by a factor of nearly 5%. But despite these early good results no breakthrough came later on, and in the last decade or so, we are still facing this plateau. New agents have recently been included in the therapeutic armamentarium, such as gemcitabine, irinotecan, paclitaxel. This fact has allowed many patients to receive a relatively active second line therapy, but the overall survival remains unchanged. Targeted therapies are undergoing some evaluations, but the data are too premature and so far quite discouraging. At the present time there is a urgent need to improve clinical research in this somehow forgotten disease.
Abstract. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) is a rare and almost always fatal late side effect of antineoplastic treatment involving chemotherapy, radiotherapy or the two combined. The present retrospective study intended to characterize t-AML patients that were diagnosed and treated in a single referral to an oncological institution in North Portugal. Over the past 10 years, 231 cases of AML were diagnosed and treated at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, of which 38 t-AML cases were identified. Data regarding the patient demographics, primary diagnosis and treatment, age at onset of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, latency time of the neoplasm, cytogenetic characteristics, AML therapy and outcome were collected from medical records. A previous diagnosis with solid tumors was present in 28 patients, and 10 patients possessed a history of hematological conditions, all a lymphoproliferative disorder. Breast cancer was the most frequent solid tumor identified (39.5% of all solid tumors diagnosed). The mean latency time was 3 years. In the present study, t-AML patients were older (P<0.001) and more frequently carried cytogenetic abnormalities (P= 0.009) compared with de novo AML patients. The overall survival time was observed to be significantly poorer among individuals with t-AML (P<0.001). However, in younger patients (age, <50 years) there was no difference between the overall survival time of patients with t-AML and those with de novo AML (P= 0.983). Additionally, patients with promyelocytic leukemia possess a good prognosis, even when AML occurs as a secondary event (P= 0.98). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate t-AML in Portugal and the results are consistent with the data published previously in other populations. The present study concludes that although t-AML demonstrates a poor prognosis, this is not observed among younger patients or promyelocytic leukemia patients.
Introduction: The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is approximately 5%. Although the introduction of rituximab for the treatment of DLBCL has reduced the risk of CNS relapse, the median overall survival of these patients remains only few months, emphasizing the need to accurately identify at-risk patients, screen for CNS disease, and develop effective therapeutic/prophylactic strategies. Aim: To identify risk factors for CNS relapse in patients with DLBCL. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2017 at a Cancer Institute. Patients with exclusive extranodal (EN) disease were excluded. Factors associated with CNS relapse were evaluated using Chi-square, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann-Withney U or T-Test, according to variable types and distributions. Survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared by Log-rank test. Independent predictive factors were identified using Logistic Regression. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Four hundred and seventy-nine patients were identified, 122 were excluded due to exclusive EN disease, and 357 patients were included in the study. With a median follow-up of 33 months, there were 10 (3%) CNS relapses. According to International Prognostic Index (IPI) factors in addition to involvement of kidneys and/or adrenal glands (CNS-IPI), 5 (50%) of these patients were classified as high risk, 4 (40%) intermediate risk and 1 (10%) low risk. Patients who development CNS involvement were significantly younger (57 vs. 65 years, p=0.036), presented higher levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (median 738 vs. 282 U/L, p<0.001) and lower levels of hemoglobin (median 10,3 vs. 12,1 g/dL, p=0.010) at diagnosis. No differences were found regarding to performance status, stage or number of EN areas. Two patients (18%) in the CNS relapse group had done CNS prophylaxis versus twenty two (6,3%) patients in the group without CNS relapse. In multivariate analysis, LDH >600 was the only independent predictive factor (HR 15.3, CI 95% 3.5 - 65.8, p<0.001). Overall survival in CNS relapse group was 22 months, versus not reached (p<0.001). Conclusion: Although CNS-IPI is a robust model to estimate the risk of CNS relapse, it does not capture the full spectrum of those at high risk. Other clinical risk factors and biomarkers beyond this model might play an important role in this setting, such as the magnitude of LDH elevation Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.