The level of copy number alteration (CNA), termed CNA burden, in the tumor genome is associated with recurrence of primary prostate cancer. Whether CNA burden is associated with prostate cancer survival or outcomes in other cancers is unknown. We analyzed the CNA landscape of conservatively treated prostate cancer in a biopsy and transurethral resection cohort, reflecting an increasingly common treatment approach. We find that CNA burden is prognostic for cancer-specific death, independent of standard clinical prognosticators. More broadly, we find CNA burden is significantly associated with disease-free and overall survival in primary breast, endometrial, renal clear cell, thyroid, and colorectal cancer in TCGA cohorts. To assess clinical applicability, we validated these findings in an independent pan-cancer cohort of patients whose tumors were sequenced using a clinically-certified next generation sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT), where prognostic value varied based on cancer type. This prognostic association was affected by incorporating tumor purity in some cohorts. Overall, CNA burden of primary and metastatic tumors is a prognostic factor, potentially modulated by sample purity and measurable by current clinical sequencing.
Key Points
Question
Can a more clinically feasible version of the modified Frailty Index for older patients with cancer be developed?
Findings
In this cohort study of 1137 older patients with cancer, the Memorial Sloan Kettering–Frailty Index (MSK-FI) was associated with aging-related impairments. A higher score on the MSK-FI was also associated with a longer length of stay, higher odds of intensive care unit admission, and lower overall survival.
Meaning
The MSK-FI may be a feasible tool to perioperatively assess frailty in older patients with cancer.
Key Points
Question
Is collaboration between geriatricians and surgeons in the perioperative care of older patients with cancer associated with postoperative outcomes?
Findings
In this cohort study including 1892 patients aged 75 years and older, the adjusted probability of death within 90 days after surgery was 4.3% for patients who received geriatric comanagement of care, compared with 8.9% for patients who received care management from the surgical service only.
Meaning
These findings suggest that when feasible, older patients undergoing surgical treatment for cancer should receive geriatric care comanagement as part of their perioperative care.
Objective
To compare the oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing nephroureterectomy (NU) with and without prior ureteroscopy (URS).
Methods
We reviewed records of all patients with no prior history of bladder cancer that underwent NU at our institution (n = 201). We compared patients who underwent URS prior to NU to patients who proceeded directly to NU based on imaging alone. After excluding patients undergoing URS with therapeutic intent, we used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for tumor characteristics with cancer specific survival (CSS), intravesical recurrence free survival (IRFS), metastasis free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) as endpoints.
Results
144 (72%) patients underwent URS prior to NU and 57 (28%) patients proceeded directly to NU. The median follow up time for survivors was 5.4 years from diagnosis. The performance of diagnostic URS prior to NU was significantly associated with IR (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.47, 4.54; p = 0.001), although it was not associated with CSS, MFS, or OS. The adjusted IRFS probability 3 years after diagnosis is 71% and 42% for patients who did not and did receive URS prior to NU, respectively (adjusted risk difference 30%; 95% CI 13%, 47%).
Conclusions
We did not find evidence that URS adversely impacts disease progression and survival in patients with UTUC. Although patients are at higher risk for IR after NU when they have undergone prior diagnostic URS, their CSS, MFS, and OS are not significantly affected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.