Background: The treatment of stage I Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) usually includes wide local excision (WLE) combined with irradiation of the tumor bed (ITB). No randomized study has ever been conducted in MCC. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of prophylactic adjuvant radiotherapy on the regional nodes. Patients and methods:In this randomized open controlled study, patients for a stage I MCC treated by WLE and ITB were randomly assigned to regional adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation. Overall survival (OS) and probability of regional recurrence (PRR) were primary end points. Progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerance of irradiation were secondary end points.Results: Eighty-three patients were included before premature interruption of the trial, due to a drop in the recruitment mainly due to the introduction of the sentinel node dissection in the management of MCC. No significant improvement in OS (P = 0.989) or PFS (P = 0.4) could be demonstrated after regional irradiation, which, however, significantly reduced the PRR (P = 0.007) with 16.7% regional recurrence rate in the observation arm versus 0% in the treatment arm. The treatment was well tolerated. Conclusion:The adjuvant regional irradiation significantly decreased the PRR in MCC, but benefit in survival could not be demonstrated.

It was remarkable that a certain degree of medical paternalism was unavoidable, regardless of the legal and ethical norms that were in place. This may not necessarily harm parents' moral experiences. Further research is required to examine parental decisional experience in other pediatric settings.

ObjectiveWe tested the effect of dietary advice dedicated to increase intake in older patients at risk for malnutrition during chemotherapy, versus usual care, on one-year mortality.MethodWe conducted a multicentre, open-label interventional, stratified (centre), parallel randomised controlled trial, with a 1∶1 ratio, with two-year follow-up. Patients were aged 70 years or older treated with chemotherapy for solid tumour and at risk of malnutrition (MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment 17–23.5). Intervention consisted of diet counselling with the aim of achieving an energy intake of 30 kCal/kg body weight/d and 1.2 g protein/kg/d, by face-to-face discussion targeting the main nutritional symptoms, compared to usual care. Interviews were performed 6 times during the chemotherapy sessions for 3 to 6 months. The primary endpoint was 1-year mortality and secondary endpoints were 2-year mortality, toxicities and chemotherapy outcomes.ResultsBetween April 2007 and March 2010 we randomised 341 patients and 336 were analysed: mean (standard deviation) age of 78.0 y (4·9), 51.2% male, mean MNA 20.2 (2.1). Distribution of cancer types was similar in the two groups; the most frequent were colon (22.4%), lymphoma (14.9%), lung (10.4%), and pancreas (17.0%). Both groups increased their dietary intake, but to a larger extent with intervention (p<0.01). At the second visit, the energy target was achieved in 57 (40.4%) patients and the protein target in 66 (46.8%) with the intervention compared respectively to 13 (13.5%) and 20 (20.8%) in the controls. Death occurred during the first year in 143 patients (42.56%), without difference according to the intervention (p = 0.79). No difference in nutritional status changes was found. Response to chemotherapy was also similar between the groups.ConclusionEarly dietary counselling was efficient in increasing intake but had no beneficial effect on mortality or secondary outcomes. Cancer cachexia antianabolism may explain this lack of effect.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00459589

The common paediatric critical care practice in France is for physicians (rather than parents) to maintain the ultimate responsibility for lifesupport decisions in children. Some French literature asserts that it is inappropriate for parents to bear such responsibilities because they do not have the required knowledge and should be protected from feeling culpable for such decisions. The aim of this grounded theory preliminary study was to examine the moral experience of parents of critically-ill children that required life-support decisions in France. A convenience purposive sample of seven parents was recruited in Paris. Five principal themes emerged as significant from these interviews: (1) a need for more information; (2) physicians should be responsible for life-support decisions; (3) the child's concerns and wishes need to be better heard; (4) maternal guilt; and (5) physicians require better training in parent communication. These findings raise important issues for clinical practice and further research in France.