Penelitian ini menemukan model evaluasi pembelajaran sejarah yang dapat memberikan informasi yang tepat dan akurat bagi pimpinan sekolah dan guru serta bermanfaat secara optimal bagi pelaksanaan program pem-belajaran sejarah di SMA. Model pengembangan yang digunakan pada pe-nelitian dan pengembangan ini memakai model Borg and Gall dengan me-modifikasi 10 tahapan penelitian menjadi 4 tahap penelitian. Uji coba dalam penelitian dan pengembangan dilakukan tiga tahap yakni uji coba pendahuluan melibatkan 20 orang pakar dan praktisi pendidikan, uji coba utama diterapkan pada 241 subjek coba di SMA Negeri I Prambanan Kla-ten, dan uji coba operasional diterapkan pada 377 subjek coba di SMA Negeri I Yogyakarta, SMA Negeri 5 Yogyakarta, SMA Islam I Gamping Sleman, dan SMA Muhammadiyah Wates dengan melibatkan kepala seko-lah, guru, dan siswa. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa model evaluasi pem-belajaran sejarah (EPS), memiliki dua komponen evaluasi program, yakni komponen kualitas pembelajaran dan hasil pembelajaran sejarah. Kualitas pembelajaran sejarah terdiri dari tujuh komponen, yakni: kinerja guru seja-rah, materi pelajaran, metode pembelajaran, sarana pembelajaran, suasana pembelajaran, sikap siswa, dan motivasi belajar sejarah, sedangkan hasil pembelajaran sejarah terdiri dari tiga komponen yakni: kecakapan akade-mik, kesadaran sejarah, dan sikap nasionalisme. Model EPS memiliki bebe-rapa karakteristik yang membedakan dengan evaluasi model lain, yakni: (a) model digunakan untuk mengevaluasi program pelaksanaan pembelajaran sejarah di SMA, (b) tidak tergantung pada pendekatan pembelajaran terten-tu, (c) komprehensif, (d) dapat digunakan sebagai evaluasi diagnostik, (e) bersifat terbuka untuk dikembangkan lebih lanjut.Kata Kunci: pengembangan model, evaluasi program, pembelajaran sejarah, SMA______________________________________________________________DEVELOPING MODEL OF HISTORY LEARNING EVALUATION PROGRAM IN SMAThis study discovers a model for the history learning evaluation (HLE) that can give accurate information to the principal and teacher and is optimally useful for the implementation of history learning programs in SHSs. This research used model developed by Borg and Gall with modify-cation from 10 steps to 4 steps. The tryouts in this research and develop-ment study were conducted in three stages, i.e. the preliminary tryout involving 20 education experts and practitioners, the main tryout involving 241 subjects in SMA Negeri I Prambanan Klaten, and the operational try-out involving 377 subjects in SMA Negeri I Yogyakarta, SMA Negeri 5 Yogyakarta, SMA Islam I Gamping Sleman, and SMA Muhammadiyah Wates, and involving the principals, teachers, and students. The study con-cludeed that the HLE model has two components of program evaluation: the history learning quality and learning result. The history learning quality consists of seven components, i.e. history teachers’ performance, history learning materials, teaching methods, history learning sources, learning atmosphere, student attitudes, and history learning motivation. The history learning results consist of three components: academic capability, history awareness, and nationalism attitude. The HLE model has some characteris-tics which are different from other evaluation models in that: (a) it is used to evaluate learning history program implementation in senior high schools, (b) it does not depend on a certain learning method, (c) it is com-prehensive, (d) it can be used as a diagnostic evaluation, and (e) it is open for further development.Keywords: the development model, program evaluation, learning history, high school

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of understanding Indonesian history, interest in learning history and national insight with the nationalism attitude among State Senior High School students in Ngaglik subdistrict, Yogyakarta. The data collection used tests and questionnaires distributed to 126 students who were the respondents, the data were analyzed quantitavely using SPSS version 21. The validity test of the instrument employed biserial point correlation and reliability test using the Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR 20) formula. Analysis prerequisite tests include normality test, linearity test, and multicollinearity test. The hypotheses were tested using Pearson’s product moment correlation and multiple correlation The results of the data analysis shows: (a) there is a positive and significant relationship between understanding Indonesian history with nationalism attitude; (b) there is a positive and significant relationship between interest in learning history and nationalism attitude; (c) there is a positive and significant relationship between national insight and nationalism; and (d) there is a simultaneously positive and significant relationship between understanding of Indonesian history, interest in learning history, and national insight with nationalism attitude.

This study aimed to: 1) Produce higher order thinking skill<strong> </strong>(HOTS) assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history; 2) Know the validity of HOTS assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history; 3) Find out the characteristics of HOTS questions in learning Indonesian history. This study employed the research and development method of the Borg and Gall model. The HOTS test item was conducted on 36 students in class XI of 2 Ngaglik State Senior High School. Data analysis includes tests of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing features and deception index. The study found: 1) The HOTS assessment instrument of multiple-choice questions consisted of 25 items; 2) The results of the HOTS question validation by two Indonesian history learning assessment experts on the material, construction and language aspects were valid and appropriate. The results of the validation by three Indonesian history teachers also stated that the assessment instruments were valid and appropriate; 3) The characteristics of HOTS questions had fulfilled the validity criteria of 23 questions, reliability with a coefficient of 0.97 (very strong), the average difficulty level is 0.33 (moderate), the average differentiation test is 0.42 (good), and the average deception index is 0.56 (good).

The purpose of this research is to investigate factors affecting Indonesian pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) teachers’ use of m-learning management systems (m-LMS) in higher education. The difference regarding the use of m-LMS based on some demographic information namely gender, university, year in university, and age are also reported as well as gaining an in-depth understanding of the use of m-LMS in Indonesian universities. To achieve this, two approaches, quantitative and qualitative, were applied. First, we developed and distributed a survey instrument to 210 students teachers based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). In addition, we interviewed 7 of the PSTs to obtain an in-depth understanding of the use of m-learning in their learning. Some statistical calculations were presented such as mean, standard deviation, Cronbach’s alpha, t-test, and ANOVA. Findings suggest that PSTs’ use m-LMS are related to their Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, Subjective norm and attitudes Self-efficacy and supporting condition. From these results, we recommend that teacher educators should target these factors within teacher development programs to prepare PSTs for successful use of m-LMS.

Achieving equal learning opportunities for all students is a major policy goal in all countries. All children have the opportunity to obtain high quality education. Teachers become a key element in improving the quality of primary and secondary education This paper is based on secondary data information collected from various sources, namely policy documents that are relevant to research topics that still apply in Indonesia, national journal articles published starting in 2010-2020, reports from various government organizations, namely the Central Statistics Agency and the Ministry of Education and Culture, reports of international organizations, namely Worldbank and UNESCO, national and local newspapers published from 2015-2020, and websites. These data are triangulated, examined, and sought supporting evidence to improve the accuracy of research. Nationally, equality education in Indonesia as measured by expand access, equal access, and quality learning shows encouraging results, only a slight imbalance occurs between urban and rural schools.