Subcortical loops through the basal ganglia and the cerebellum form computationally powerful distributed processing modules (DPMs). This paper relates the computational features of a DPM's loop through the basal ganglia to experimental results for two kinds of natural action selection. First, functional imaging during a serial order recall task was used to study human brain activity during the selection of sequential actions from working memory. Second, microelectrode recordings from monkeys trained in a step-tracking task were used to study the natural selection of corrective submovements. Our DPM-based model assisted in the interpretation of puzzling data from both of these experiments. We come to posit that the many loops through the basal ganglia each regulate the embodiment of pattern formation in a given area of cerebral cortex. This operation serves to instantiate different kinds of action (or thought) mediated by different areas of cerebral cortex. We then use our findings to formulate a model of the aetiology of schizophrenia.

Neurons in sensory cortices are often assumed to be "feature detectors", computing simple and then successively more complex features out of the incoming sensory stream. These features are somehow integrated into percepts. Despite many years of research, a convincing candidate for such a feature in primary auditory cortex has not been found. We argue that feature detection is actually a secondary issue in understanding the role of primary auditory cortex. Instead, the major contribution of primary auditory cortex to auditory perception is in processing previously derived features on a number of different timescales. We hypothesize that, as a result, neurons in primary auditory cortex represent sounds in terms of auditory objects rather than in terms of feature maps. According to this hypothesis, primary auditory cortex has a pivotal role in the auditory system in that it generates the representation of auditory objects to which higher auditory centers assign properties such as spatial location, source identity, and meaning.

Primary segmentation of visual scenes is based on spatiotemporal edges that are presumably detected by neurons throughout the visual system. In contrast, the way in which the auditory system decomposes complex auditory scenes is substantially less clear. There is diverse physiological and psychophysical evidence for the sensitivity of the auditory system to amplitude transients, which can be considered as a partial analogue to visual spatiotemporal edges. However, there is currently no theoretical framework in which these phenomena can be associated or related to the perceptual task of auditory source segregation. We propose a neural model for an auditory temporal edge detector, whose underlying principles are similar to classical visual edge detector models. Our main result is that this model reproduces published physiological responses to amplitude transients collected at multiple levels of the auditory pathways using a variety of experimental procedures. Moreover, the model successfully predicts physiological responses to a new set of amplitude transients, collected in cat primary auditory cortex and medial geniculate body. Additionally, the model reproduces several published psychoacoustical responses to amplitude transients as well as the psychoacoustical data for amplitude edge detection reported here for the first time. These results support the hypothesis that the response of auditory neurons to amplitude transients is the correlate of psychoacoustical edge detection.

Survivors of spinal cord injury need to reorganize their residual body movements for interacting with assistive devices and performing activities that used to be easy and natural. To investigate movement reorganization, we asked subjects with high-level spinal cord injury (SCI) and unimpaired subjects to control a cursor on a screen by performing upper-body motions. While this task would be normally accomplished by operating a computer mouse, here shoulder motions were mapped into the cursor position. Both the control and the SCI subjects were rapidly able to reorganize their movements and to successfully control the cursor. The majority of the subjects in both groups were successful in reducing the movements that were not effective at producing cursor motions. This is inconsistent with the hypothesis that the control system is merely concerned with the accurate acquisition of the targets and is unconcerned with motions that are not relevant to this goal. In contrast, our findings suggest that subjects can learn to reorganize coordination so as to increase the correspondence between the subspace of their upper-body motions with the plane in which the controlled cursor moves. This is effectively equivalent to constructing an inverse internal model of the map from body motions to cursor motions, established by the experiment. These results are relevant to the development of interfaces for assistive devices that optimize the use of residual voluntary control and enhance the learning process in disabled users, searching for an easily learnable map between their body motor space and control space of the device.